From 03045622bfb72798c4136047f9420671a2a6713d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:30:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 470/518] i2c: hix5hd2: Remove IRQF_ONESHOT

[ Upstream commit e88b481f3f86f11e3243e0808a830e5ca5782a9d ]

The drivers sets IRQF_ONESHOT and passes only a primary handler. The IRQ
is masked while the primary is handler is invoked independently of
IRQF_ONESHOT.
With IRQF_ONESHOT the core code will not force-thread the interrupt and
this is probably not intended. I *assume* that the original author copied
the IRQ registration from another driver which passed a primary and
secondary handler and removed the secondary handler but keeping the
ONESHOT flag.

Remove IRQF_ONESHOT.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-hix5hd2.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-hix5hd2.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-hix5hd2.c
index aa5c55bd8b112..72f159745aebc 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-hix5hd2.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-hix5hd2.c
@@ -464,8 +464,7 @@ static int hix5hd2_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	hix5hd2_i2c_init(priv);
 
 	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, hix5hd2_i2c_irq,
-			       IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
-			       dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
+			       IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
 	if (ret != 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot request HS-I2C IRQ %d\n", irq);
 		goto err_clk;
-- 
2.41.0

