(************************************************************************)
(*         *   The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team       *)
(*  v      *         Copyright INRIA, CNRS and contributors             *)
(* <O___,, * (see version control and CREDITS file for authors & dates) *)
(*   \VV/  **************************************************************)
(*    //   *    This file is distributed under the terms of the         *)
(*         *     GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1          *)
(*         *     (see LICENSE file for the text of the license)         *)
(************************************************************************)

Require Import Rbase.
Require Import Rfunctions.
Require Import Ranalysis_reg.
Require Import Classical_Prop.
Require Import List.
Require Import RList.
Require Import Lia Lra.
Local Open Scope R_scope.

Set Implicit Arguments.

(*****************************************************)
(** * Each bounded subset of N has a maximal element *)
(*****************************************************)

Definition Nbound (I:nat -> Prop) : Prop :=
  exists n : nat, (forall i:nat, I i -> (i <= n)%nat).

Lemma IZN_var : forall z:Z, (0 <= z)%Z -> {n : nat | z = Z.of_nat n}.
Proof.
  intros; apply Z_of_nat_complete_inf; assumption.
Qed.

Lemma Nzorn :
  forall I:nat -> Prop,
    (exists n : nat, I n) ->
    Nbound I -> { n:nat | I n /\ (forall i:nat, I i -> (i <= n)%nat) }.
Proof.
  intros I H H0; set (E := fun x:R =>  exists i : nat, I i /\ INR i = x);
    assert (H1 : bound E).
  { unfold Nbound in H0; elim H0; intros N H1; unfold bound;
    exists (INR N); unfold is_upper_bound; intros;
      unfold E in H2; elim H2; intros; elim H3; intros;
        rewrite <- H5; apply le_INR; apply H1; assumption. }
  assert (H2 :  exists x : R, E x).
  { elim H; intros; exists (INR x); unfold E; exists x; split;
    [ assumption | reflexivity ]. }
  destruct (completeness E H1 H2) as (x,(H4,H5)); unfold is_upper_bound in H4, H5;
    assert (H6 : 0 <= x).
  { destruct H2 as (x0,H6). remember H6 as H7. destruct H7 as (x1,(H8,H9)).
    apply Rle_trans with x0;
      [ rewrite <- H9; change (INR 0 <= INR x1); apply le_INR;
        apply Nat.le_0_l
        | apply H4; assumption ]. }
  assert (H7 := archimed x); elim H7; clear H7; intros;
    assert (H9 : x <= IZR (up x) - 1).
  { apply H5; intros x0 H9. assert (H10 := H4 _ H9); unfold E in H9; elim H9; intros x1 (H12,<-).
    apply Rplus_le_reg_l with 1;
      replace (1 + (IZR (up x) - 1)) with (IZR (up x));
      [ idtac | ring ]; replace (1 + INR x1) with (INR (S x1));
      [ idtac | rewrite S_INR; ring ].
    assert (H14 : (0 <= up x)%Z).
    { apply le_IZR; apply Rle_trans with x; [ apply H6 | left; assumption ]. }
    destruct (IZN _ H14) as (x2,H15).
    rewrite H15, <- INR_IZR_INZ; apply le_INR; apply Nat.le_succ_l.
    apply INR_lt; apply Rle_lt_trans with x;
      [ assumption | rewrite INR_IZR_INZ; rewrite <- H15; assumption ]. }
  assert (H10 : x = IZR (up x) - 1).
  { apply Rle_antisym;
    [ assumption
      | apply Rplus_le_reg_l with (- x + 1);
        replace (- x + 1 + (IZR (up x) - 1)) with (IZR (up x) - x);
        [ idtac | ring ]; replace (- x + 1 + x) with 1;
        [ assumption | ring ] ]. }
  assert (H11 : (0 <= up x)%Z).
  { apply le_IZR; apply Rle_trans with x; [ apply H6 | left; assumption ]. }
  assert (H12 := IZN_var H11); elim H12; clear H12; intros x0 H8; assert (H13 : E x).
  2:{ split with (pred x0); unfold E in H13; elim H13; intros; elim H12; intros;
      rewrite H10 in H15; rewrite H8 in H15; rewrite <- INR_IZR_INZ in H15;
      assert (H16 : INR x0 = INR x1 + 1).
      { rewrite H15; ring. }
      rewrite <- S_INR in H16; assert (H17 := INR_eq _ _ H16); rewrite H17;
        simpl; split.
      { assumption. }
      intros; apply INR_le; rewrite H15; rewrite <- H15; elim H12; intros;
        rewrite H20; apply H4; unfold E; exists i;
        split; [ assumption | reflexivity ]. }
  elim (classic (E x)); intro; try assumption.
  cut (forall y:R, E y -> y <= x - 1).
  { intro H13; assert (H14 := H5 _ H13); lra. }
  intros y H13; assert (H14 := H4 _ H13); elim H14; intro H15; unfold E in H13; elim H13;
    intros x1 H16; elim H16; intros H17 H18; apply Rplus_le_reg_l with 1.
  2:{ rewrite H15 in H13; elim H12; assumption. }
  replace (1 + (x - 1)) with x; [ idtac | ring ]; rewrite <- H18;
    replace (1 + INR x1) with (INR (S x1)); [ idtac | rewrite S_INR; ring ].
  cut (x = INR (pred x0)).
  { intro H19; rewrite H19; apply le_INR; apply Nat.le_succ_l; apply INR_lt; rewrite H18;
      rewrite <- H19; assumption. }
  rewrite H10; rewrite H8; rewrite <- INR_IZR_INZ;
    rewrite <- (minus_INR _ 1).
  { apply f_equal;
      case x0; [ reflexivity | intro; apply Nat.sub_0_r ]. }
  induction x0 as [|x0 Hrecx0].
  { rewrite H8 in H3. rewrite <- INR_IZR_INZ in H3; simpl in H3.
    elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rle_lt_trans _ _ _ H6 H3)). }
  apply le_n_S; apply Nat.le_0_l.
Qed.

(*******************************************)
(** *          Step functions              *)
(*******************************************)

Definition open_interval (a b x:R) : Prop := a < x < b.
Definition co_interval (a b x:R) : Prop := a <= x < b.

Definition adapted_couple (f:R -> R) (a b:R) (l lf:list R) : Prop :=
  ordered_Rlist l /\
  pos_Rl l 0 = Rmin a b /\
  pos_Rl l (pred (length l)) = Rmax a b /\
  length l = S (length lf) /\
  (forall i:nat,
    (i < pred (length l))%nat ->
    constant_D_eq f (open_interval (pos_Rl l i) (pos_Rl l (S i)))
    (pos_Rl lf i)).

Definition adapted_couple_opt (f:R -> R) (a b:R) (l lf:list R) :=
  adapted_couple f a b l lf /\
  (forall i:nat,
    (i < pred (length lf))%nat ->
    pos_Rl lf i <> pos_Rl lf (S i) \/ f (pos_Rl l (S i)) <> pos_Rl lf i) /\
  (forall i:nat, (i < pred (length l))%nat -> pos_Rl l i <> pos_Rl l (S i)).

Definition is_subdivision (f:R -> R) (a b:R) (l:list R) : Type :=
  { l0:list R & adapted_couple f a b l l0 }.

Definition IsStepFun (f:R -> R) (a b:R) : Type :=
  { l:list R & is_subdivision f a b l }.

(** ** Class of step functions *)
Record StepFun (a b:R) : Type := mkStepFun
  {fe :> R -> R; pre : IsStepFun fe a b}.

Definition subdivision (a b:R) (f:StepFun a b) : list R := projT1 (pre f).

Definition subdivision_val (a b:R) (f:StepFun a b) : list R :=
  match projT2 (pre f) with
    | existT _ a b => a
  end.

Fixpoint Int_SF (l k:list R) : R :=
  match l with
    | nil => 0
    | cons a l' =>
      match k with
        | nil => 0
        | cons x nil => 0
        | cons x (cons y k') => a * (y - x) + Int_SF l' (cons y k')
      end
  end.

(** ** Integral of step functions *)
Definition RiemannInt_SF (a b:R) (f:StepFun a b) : R :=
  match Rle_dec a b with
    | left _ => Int_SF (subdivision_val f) (subdivision f)
    | right _ => - Int_SF (subdivision_val f) (subdivision f)
  end.

(************************************)
(** ** Properties of step functions *)
(************************************)

Lemma StepFun_P1 :
  forall (a b:R) (f:StepFun a b),
    adapted_couple f a b (subdivision f) (subdivision_val f).
Proof.
  intros a b f; unfold subdivision_val; case (projT2 (pre f)) as (x,H);
    apply H.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P2 :
  forall (a b:R) (f:R -> R) (l lf:list R),
    adapted_couple f a b l lf -> adapted_couple f b a l lf.
Proof.
  unfold adapted_couple; intros; decompose [and] H; clear H;
    repeat split; try assumption.
  - rewrite H2; unfold Rmin; case (Rle_dec a b); intro;
      case (Rle_dec b a); intro; try reflexivity.
    + apply Rle_antisym; assumption.
    + apply Rle_antisym; auto with real.
  - rewrite H1; unfold Rmax; case (Rle_dec a b); intro;
      case (Rle_dec b a); intro; try reflexivity.
    + apply Rle_antisym; assumption.
    + apply Rle_antisym; auto with real.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P3 :
  forall a b c:R,
    a <= b ->
    adapted_couple (fct_cte c) a b (cons a (cons b nil)) (cons c nil).
Proof.
  intros; unfold adapted_couple; repeat split.
  - unfold ordered_Rlist; intros; simpl in H0; inversion H0;
      [ simpl; assumption | elim (Nat.nle_succ_0 _ H2) ].
  - simpl; unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H; reflexivity.
  - simpl; unfold Rmax; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H; reflexivity.
  - unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros; simpl in H0;
      inversion H0; [ reflexivity | elim (Nat.nle_succ_0 _ H3) ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P4 : forall a b c:R, IsStepFun (fct_cte c) a b.
Proof.
  intros; unfold IsStepFun; destruct (Rle_dec a b) as [Hle|Hnle].
  - apply existT with (cons a (cons b nil)); unfold is_subdivision;
      apply existT with (cons c nil); apply (StepFun_P3 c Hle).
  - apply existT with (cons b (cons a nil)); unfold is_subdivision;
      apply existT with (cons c nil); apply StepFun_P2;
      apply StepFun_P3; auto with real.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P5 :
  forall (a b:R) (f:R -> R) (l:list R),
    is_subdivision f a b l -> is_subdivision f b a l.
Proof.
  destruct 1 as (x,(H0,(H1,(H2,(H3,H4))))); exists x;
    repeat split; try assumption.
  - rewrite H1; apply Rmin_comm.
  - rewrite H2; apply Rmax_comm.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P6 :
  forall (f:R -> R) (a b:R), IsStepFun f a b -> IsStepFun f b a.
Proof.
  unfold IsStepFun; intros; elim X; intros; apply existT with x;
    apply StepFun_P5; assumption.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P7 :
  forall (a b r1 r2 r3:R) (f:R -> R) (l lf:list R),
    a <= b ->
    adapted_couple f a b (cons r1 (cons r2 l)) (cons r3 lf) ->
    adapted_couple f r2 b (cons r2 l) lf.
Proof.
  unfold adapted_couple; intros; decompose [and] H0; clear H0;
    assert (H5 : Rmax a b = b).
  { unfold Rmax; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H; reflexivity. }
  assert (H7 : r2 <= b).
  { rewrite H5 in H2; rewrite <- H2; apply RList_P7;
    [ assumption | simpl; right; left; reflexivity ]. }
  repeat split.
  - apply RList_P4 with r1; assumption.
  - rewrite H5 in H2; unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec r2 b) with H7; reflexivity.
  - unfold Rmax; decide (Rle_dec r2 b) with H7.
    rewrite H5 in H2; rewrite <- H2; reflexivity.
  - simpl in H4; simpl; apply INR_eq; apply Rplus_eq_reg_l with 1;
      do 2 rewrite (Rplus_comm 1); do 2 rewrite <- S_INR;
      rewrite H4; reflexivity.
  - intros; unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros;
      unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval in H6;
      assert (H9 : (S i < pred (length (cons r1 (cons r2 l))))%nat).
    + simpl; simpl in H0; apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption.
    + assert (H10 := H6 _ H9); apply H10; assumption.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P8 :
  forall (f:R -> R) (l1 lf1:list R) (a b:R),
    adapted_couple f a b l1 lf1 -> a = b -> Int_SF lf1 l1 = 0.
Proof.
  simple induction l1.
  { intros; induction  lf1 as [| r lf1 Hreclf1]; reflexivity. }
  intros r r0.
  induction r0 as [ | r1 r2 H0].
  - intros; induction  lf1 as [| r1 lf1 Hreclf1].
    + reflexivity.
    + unfold adapted_couple in H0; decompose [and] H0; clear H0; simpl in H5;
        discriminate.
  - intros H.
    induction  lf1 as [| r3 lf1 Hreclf1]; intros a b H1 H2.
    + reflexivity.
    + simpl; cut (r = r1).
      * intros H3.
        rewrite H3; rewrite (H lf1 r b).
        -- ring.
        -- rewrite H3; apply StepFun_P7 with a r r3; [ right; assumption | assumption ].
        -- clear H H0 Hreclf1; unfold adapted_couple in H1.
           decompose [and] H1.
           intros; simpl in H4; rewrite H4; unfold Rmin;
             case (Rle_dec a b); intro; [ assumption | reflexivity ].

      * unfold adapted_couple in H1; decompose [and] H1; intros; apply Rle_antisym.
        -- apply (H3 0%nat); simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ.
        -- simpl in H5; rewrite H2 in H5; rewrite H5; replace (Rmin b b) with (Rmax a b);
             [ rewrite <- H4; apply RList_P7;
               [ assumption | simpl; right; left; reflexivity ]
             | unfold Rmin, Rmax; case (Rle_dec b b); case (Rle_dec a b); intros;
               try assumption || reflexivity ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P9 :
  forall (a b:R) (f:R -> R) (l lf:list R),
    adapted_couple f a b l lf -> a <> b -> (2 <= length l)%nat.
Proof.
  intros; unfold adapted_couple in H; decompose [and] H; clear H;
    induction  l as [| r l Hrecl].
  - simpl in H4; discriminate.
  - induction  l as [| r0 l Hrecl0];
      [ simpl in H3; simpl in H2; generalize H3; generalize H2;
        unfold Rmin, Rmax; case (Rle_dec a b);
        intros; elim H0; rewrite <- H5; rewrite <- H7;
        reflexivity
      | simpl; do 2 apply le_n_S; apply Nat.le_0_l ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P10 :
  forall (f:R -> R) (l lf:list R) (a b:R),
    a <= b ->
    adapted_couple f a b l lf ->
    exists l' : list R,
      (exists lf' : list R, adapted_couple_opt f a b l' lf').
Proof.
  induction l as [ | r r0 H].
  { intros; unfold adapted_couple in H0; decompose [and] H0; simpl in H4;
    discriminate. }
  intros; case (Req_dec a b); intro.
  { exists (cons a nil); exists nil; unfold adapted_couple_opt;
      unfold adapted_couple; unfold ordered_Rlist;
      repeat split; try (intros; simpl in H3; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H3)).
    1,2:simpl; rewrite <- H2; unfold Rmin,Rmax; case (Rle_dec a a); intro;
      reflexivity. }
  elim (RList_P20 _ (StepFun_P9 H1 H2)); intros t1 [t2 [t3 H3]];
    induction  lf as [| r1 lf Hreclf].
  { unfold adapted_couple in H1; decompose [and] H1; rewrite H3 in H7;
    simpl in H7; discriminate. }
  clear Hreclf; assert (H4 : adapted_couple f t2 b r0 lf).
  { rewrite H3 in H1; assert (H4 := RList_P21 _ _ H3); simpl in H4; rewrite H4;
    eapply StepFun_P7; [ apply H0 | apply H1 ]. }
  assert (t2 <= b). {
    rewrite H3 in H1; clear H4; unfold adapted_couple in H1; decompose [and] H1;
      clear H1; clear H H7 H9; cut (Rmax a b = b);
      [ intro; rewrite H in H5; rewrite <- H5; apply RList_P7;
        [ assumption | simpl; right; left; reflexivity ]
      | unfold Rmax; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H0; reflexivity ].
  }
  assert (H6 := H _ _ _ H5 H4); case (Req_dec t1 t2); intro Hyp_eq.
  { replace a with t2.
    { apply H6. }
    rewrite <- Hyp_eq; rewrite H3 in H1; unfold adapted_couple in H1;
      decompose [and] H1; clear H1; simpl in H9; rewrite H9;
      unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H0; reflexivity. }
  elim H6; clear H6; intros l' [lf' H6]; case (Req_dec t2 b); intro.
  { exists (cons a (cons b nil)); exists (cons r1 nil);
      unfold adapted_couple_opt; unfold adapted_couple;
      repeat split.
    - unfold ordered_Rlist; intros; simpl in H8; inversion H8;
        [ simpl; assumption | elim (Nat.nle_succ_0 _ H10) ].
    - simpl; unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H0; reflexivity.
    - simpl; unfold Rmax; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H0; reflexivity.
    - intros; simpl in H8; inversion H8.
      + unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros; simpl;
          simpl in H9; rewrite H3 in H1; unfold adapted_couple in H1;
          decompose [and] H1; apply (H16 0%nat).
        * simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ.
        * unfold open_interval; simpl; rewrite H7; simpl in H13;
            rewrite H13; unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H0; assumption.
      + elim (Nat.nle_succ_0 _ H10).
    - intros; simpl in H8; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H8).
    - intros; simpl in H8; inversion H8;
        [ simpl; assumption | elim (Nat.nle_succ_0 _ H10) ]. }
  assert (Hyp_min : Rmin t2 b = t2) by apply Rmin_left,H5.
  unfold adapted_couple in H6; elim H6; clear H6; intros;
    elim (RList_P20 _ (StepFun_P9 H6 H7)); intros s1 [s2 [s3 H9]];
      induction  lf' as [| r2 lf' Hreclf'].
  { unfold adapted_couple in H6; decompose [and] H6; rewrite H9 in H13;
    simpl in H13; discriminate. }
  clear Hreclf'; case (Req_dec r1 r2); intro.
  1:case (Req_dec (f t2) r1); intro.
  - exists (cons t1 (cons s2 s3)); exists (cons r1 lf'); rewrite H3 in H1;
      rewrite H9 in H6; unfold adapted_couple in H6, H1;
      decompose [and] H1; decompose [and] H6; clear H1 H6;
      unfold adapted_couple_opt; unfold adapted_couple;
      repeat split.
    + unfold ordered_Rlist; intros; simpl in H1;
      induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; apply Rle_trans with s1.
        { replace s1 with t2.
          { apply (H12 0%nat).
            simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
          simpl in H19; rewrite H19; symmetry ; apply Hyp_min. }
        apply (H16 0%nat); simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
      change (pos_Rl (cons s2 s3) i <= pos_Rl (cons s2 s3) (S i));
        apply (H16 (S i)); simpl; assumption.
    + simpl; simpl in H14; rewrite H14; reflexivity.
    + simpl; simpl in H18; rewrite H18; unfold Rmax;
        decide (Rle_dec a b) with H0; decide (Rle_dec t2 b) with H5; reflexivity.
    + simpl; simpl in H20; apply H20.
    + intros; simpl in H1; unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros;
        induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; simpl in H6; destruct (total_order_T x t2) as [[Hlt|Heq]|Hgt].
        - apply (H17 0%nat);
            [ simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ
            | unfold open_interval; simpl; elim H6; intros; split;
              assumption ].
        - rewrite Heq; assumption.
        - rewrite H10; apply (H22 0%nat);
            [ simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ
            | unfold open_interval; simpl; replace s1 with t2;
              [ elim H6; intros; split; assumption
              | simpl in H19; rewrite H19; rewrite Hyp_min; reflexivity ] ]. }
      simpl; simpl in H6; apply (H22 (S i));
        [ simpl; assumption
        | unfold open_interval; simpl; apply H6 ].
    + intros; simpl in H1; rewrite H10;
        change
          (pos_Rl (cons r2 lf') i <> pos_Rl (cons r2 lf') (S i) \/
             f (pos_Rl (cons s1 (cons s2 s3)) (S i)) <> pos_Rl (cons r2 lf') i)
      ; rewrite <- H9; elim H8; intros; apply H6;
        simpl; apply H1.
    + intros; induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; red; intro; elim Hyp_eq; apply Rle_antisym.
        - apply (H12 0%nat); simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ.
        - rewrite <- Hyp_min; rewrite H6; simpl in H19; rewrite <- H19;
            apply (H16 0%nat); simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
      elim H8; intros; rewrite H9 in H21; apply (H21 (S i)); simpl;
        simpl in H1; apply H1.
  - exists (cons t1 l'); exists (cons r1 (cons r2 lf')); rewrite H9 in H6;
      rewrite H3 in H1; unfold adapted_couple in H1, H6;
      decompose [and] H6; decompose [and] H1; clear H6 H1;
      unfold adapted_couple_opt; unfold adapted_couple;
      repeat split.
    + rewrite H9; unfold ordered_Rlist; intros; simpl in H1;
        induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; replace s1 with t2.
        { apply (H16 0%nat); simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
        simpl in H14; rewrite H14; rewrite Hyp_min; reflexivity. }
      change
        (pos_Rl (cons s1 (cons s2 s3)) i <= pos_Rl (cons s1 (cons s2 s3)) (S i))
      ; apply (H12 i); simpl; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono;
        assumption.
    + simpl; simpl in H19; apply H19.
    + rewrite H9; simpl; simpl in H13; rewrite H13; unfold Rmax;
        decide (Rle_dec t2 b) with H5; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H0; reflexivity.
    + rewrite H9; simpl; simpl in H15; rewrite H15; reflexivity.
    + intros; simpl in H1; unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros;
        induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; rewrite H9 in H6; simpl in H6; apply (H22 0%nat).
        { simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
        unfold open_interval; simpl.
        replace t2 with s1.
        { assumption. }
        simpl in H14; rewrite H14; rewrite Hyp_min; reflexivity. }
      change (f x = pos_Rl (cons r2 lf') i); clear Hreci; apply (H17 i).
      { simpl; rewrite H9 in H1; simpl in H1; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; apply H1. }
      rewrite H9 in H6; unfold open_interval; apply H6.
    + intros; simpl in H1; induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; rewrite H9; right; simpl; replace s1 with t2.
        { assumption. }
        simpl in H14; rewrite H14; rewrite Hyp_min; reflexivity. }
      elim H8; intros; apply (H6 i).
      simpl; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; apply H1.
    + intros; rewrite H9; induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; red; intro; elim Hyp_eq; apply Rle_antisym.
        { apply (H16 0%nat); simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
        rewrite <- Hyp_min; rewrite H6; simpl in H14; rewrite <- H14; right;
          reflexivity. }
      elim H8; intros; rewrite <- H9; apply (H21 i); rewrite H9; rewrite H9 in H1;
        simpl; simpl in H1; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; apply H1.
  - exists (cons t1 l'); exists (cons r1 (cons r2 lf')); rewrite H9 in H6;
      rewrite H3 in H1; unfold adapted_couple in H1, H6;
      decompose [and] H6; decompose [and] H1; clear H6 H1;
      unfold adapted_couple_opt; unfold adapted_couple;
      repeat split.
    + rewrite H9; unfold ordered_Rlist; intros; simpl in H1;
        induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; replace s1 with t2.
        { apply (H15 0%nat); simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
        simpl in H13; rewrite H13; rewrite Hyp_min; reflexivity. }
      change
        (pos_Rl (cons s1 (cons s2 s3)) i <= pos_Rl (cons s1 (cons s2 s3)) (S i))
      ; apply (H11 i); simpl; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono;
        assumption.
    + simpl; simpl in H18; apply H18.
    + rewrite H9; simpl; simpl in H12; rewrite H12; unfold Rmax;
        decide (Rle_dec t2 b) with H5; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H0; reflexivity.
    + rewrite H9; simpl; simpl in H14; rewrite H14; reflexivity.
    + intros; simpl in H1; unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros;
        induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; rewrite H9 in H6; simpl in H6; apply (H21 0%nat).
        { simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
        unfold open_interval; simpl; replace t2 with s1.
        { assumption. }
        simpl in H13; rewrite H13; rewrite Hyp_min; reflexivity. }
      change (f x = pos_Rl (cons r2 lf') i); clear Hreci; apply (H16 i).
      { simpl; rewrite H9 in H1; simpl in H1; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; apply H1. }
      rewrite H9 in H6; unfold open_interval; apply H6.
    + intros; simpl in H1; induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; left; assumption. }
      elim H8; intros; apply (H6 i).
      simpl; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; apply H1.
    + intros; rewrite H9; induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; red; intro; elim Hyp_eq; apply Rle_antisym.
        { apply (H15 0%nat); simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
        rewrite <- Hyp_min; rewrite H6; simpl in H13; rewrite <- H13; right;
          reflexivity. }
      elim H8; intros; rewrite <- H9; apply (H20 i); rewrite H9; rewrite H9 in H1;
        simpl; simpl in H1; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; apply H1.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P11 :
  forall (a b r r1 r3 s1 s2 r4:R) (r2 lf1 s3 lf2:list R)
    (f:R -> R),
    a < b ->
    adapted_couple f a b (cons r (cons r1 r2)) (cons r3 lf1) ->
    adapted_couple_opt f a b (cons s1 (cons s2 s3)) (cons r4 lf2) -> r1 <= s2.
Proof.
  intros; unfold adapted_couple_opt in H1; elim H1; clear H1; intros;
    unfold adapted_couple in H0, H1; decompose [and] H0;
    decompose [and] H1; clear H0 H1; assert (H12 : r = s1).
  { simpl in H10; simpl in H5; congruence. }
  assert (H14 := H3 0%nat (Nat.lt_0_succ _)); simpl in H14; elim H14; intro.
  2:{ rewrite <- H0; rewrite H12; apply (H7 0%nat); simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
  assert (H15 := H7 0%nat (Nat.lt_0_succ _)); simpl in H15; elim H15; intro.
  2:{ elim H2; clear H2; intros; assert (H17 := H16 0%nat); simpl in H17;
      elim (H17 (Nat.lt_0_succ _)); assumption. }
  rewrite <- H12 in H1; destruct (Rle_dec r1 s2) as [Hle|Hnle]; try assumption.
  assert (H16 : s2 < r1) by auto with real.
  induction  s3 as [| r0 s3 Hrecs3].
  { simpl in H9; rewrite H9 in H16; cut (r1 <= Rmax a b).
    { intro; elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rle_lt_trans _ _ _ H17 H16)). }
    rewrite <- H4; apply RList_P7;
      [ assumption | simpl; right; left; reflexivity ]. }
  clear Hrecs3; induction  lf2 as [| r5 lf2 Hreclf2].
  { simpl in H11; discriminate. }
  clear Hreclf2; assert (H17 : r3 = r4).
  { set (x := (r + s2) / 2); assert (H17 := H8 0%nat (Nat.lt_0_succ _));
      assert (H18 := H13 0%nat (Nat.lt_0_succ _));
      unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval in H17, H18; simpl in H17;
      simpl in H18; rewrite <- (H17 x).
    1: apply H18;rewrite <- H12.
    1,2: unfold x; lra. }
  assert (H18 : f s2 = r3).
  { apply (H8 0%nat);
      [ simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ
      | unfold open_interval; simpl; split; assumption ]. }
  assert (H19 : r3 = r5).
  2:{ elim H2; intros; assert (H22 := H20 0%nat); simpl in H22;
      assert (H23 := H22 (Nat.lt_0_succ _)); elim H23; intro;
      [ elim H24; rewrite <- H17; rewrite <- H19; reflexivity
      | elim H24; rewrite <- H17; assumption ]. }
  assert (H19 := H7 1%nat); simpl in H19;
    assert (H20 := H19 (proj1 (Nat.succ_lt_mono _ _) (Nat.lt_0_succ _))); elim H20;
    intro.
  2:{ elim H2; clear H2; intros; assert (H23 := H22 1%nat); simpl in H23;
      assert (H24 := H23 (proj1 (Nat.succ_lt_mono _ _) (Nat.lt_0_succ _))); elim H24;
      assumption. }
  set (x := (s2 + Rmin r1 r0) / 2); assert (H22 := H8 0%nat);
    assert (H23 := H13 1%nat); simpl in H22; simpl in H23;
    rewrite <- (H22 (Nat.lt_0_succ _) x).
  1:apply (H23 (proj1 (Nat.succ_lt_mono _ _) (Nat.lt_0_succ _)) x).
  1,2:unfold open_interval; simpl; unfold x;
    unfold Rmin;destruct (Rle_dec r1 r0);lra.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P12 :
  forall (a b:R) (f:R -> R) (l lf:list R),
    adapted_couple_opt f a b l lf -> adapted_couple_opt f b a l lf.
Proof.
  unfold adapted_couple_opt; unfold adapted_couple; intros;
    decompose [and] H; clear H; repeat split; try assumption.
  - rewrite H0; unfold Rmin; case (Rle_dec a b); intro;
      case (Rle_dec b a); intro; try reflexivity.
    + apply Rle_antisym; assumption.
    + apply Rle_antisym; auto with real.
  - rewrite H3; unfold Rmax; case (Rle_dec a b); intro;
      case (Rle_dec b a); intro; try reflexivity.
    + apply Rle_antisym; assumption.
    + apply Rle_antisym; auto with real.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P13 :
  forall (a b r r1 r3 s1 s2 r4:R) (r2 lf1 s3 lf2:list R)
    (f:R -> R),
    a <> b ->
    adapted_couple f a b (cons r (cons r1 r2)) (cons r3 lf1) ->
    adapted_couple_opt f a b (cons s1 (cons s2 s3)) (cons r4 lf2) -> r1 <= s2.
Proof.
  intros; destruct (total_order_T a b) as [[Hlt|Heq]|Hgt].
  - eapply StepFun_P11; [ apply Hlt | apply H0 | apply H1 ].
  - elim H; assumption.
  - eapply StepFun_P11;
      [ apply Hgt | apply StepFun_P2; apply H0 | apply StepFun_P12; apply H1 ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P14 :
  forall (f:R -> R) (l1 l2 lf1 lf2:list R) (a b:R),
    a <= b ->
    adapted_couple f a b l1 lf1 ->
    adapted_couple_opt f a b l2 lf2 -> Int_SF lf1 l1 = Int_SF lf2 l2.
Proof.
  induction l1 as [ | r r0 H0].
  { intros l2 lf1 lf2 a b Hyp H H0; unfold adapted_couple in H; decompose [and] H;
    clear H H0 H2 H3 H1 H6; simpl in H4; discriminate. }
  induction r0 as [|r1 r2 H].
  { intros; case (Req_dec a b); intro.
    - unfold adapted_couple_opt in H2; elim H2; intros; rewrite (StepFun_P8 H4 H3);
      rewrite (StepFun_P8 H1 H3); reflexivity.
    - assert (H4 := StepFun_P9 H1 H3); simpl in H4;
      elim (Nat.nle_succ_0 _ (le_S_n _ _ H4)). }
  intros; clear H; unfold adapted_couple_opt in H3; elim H3; clear H3; intros;
    case (Req_dec a b); intro.
  { rewrite (StepFun_P8 H2 H4); rewrite (StepFun_P8 H H4); reflexivity. }
  assert (Hyp_min : Rmin a b = a).
  { unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H1; reflexivity. }
  assert (Hyp_max : Rmax a b = b).
  { unfold Rmax; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H1; reflexivity. }
  elim (RList_P20 _ (StepFun_P9 H H4)); intros s1 [s2 [s3 H5]]; rewrite H5 in H;
    rewrite H5; induction  lf1 as [| r3 lf1 Hreclf1].
  { unfold adapted_couple in H2; decompose [and] H2;
    clear H H2 H4 H5 H3 H6 H8 H7 H11; simpl in H9; discriminate. }
  clear Hreclf1; induction  lf2 as [| r4 lf2 Hreclf2].
  { unfold adapted_couple in H; decompose [and] H;
    clear H H2 H4 H5 H3 H6 H8 H7 H11; simpl in H9; discriminate. }
  clear Hreclf2; assert (H6 : r = s1).
  { unfold adapted_couple in H, H2; decompose [and] H; decompose [and] H2;
    clear H H2; simpl in H13; simpl in H8; rewrite H13;
      rewrite H8; reflexivity. }
  assert (H7 : r3 = r4 \/ r = r1). {
    case (Req_dec r r1); intro.
    { right; assumption. }
    left; assert (r1 <= s2). {
      eapply StepFun_P13.
      - apply H4.
      - apply H2.
      - unfold adapted_couple_opt; split.
        + apply H.
        + rewrite H5 in H3; apply H3.
    }
    unfold adapted_couple in H2, H; decompose [and] H; decompose [and] H2;
      clear H H2; set (x := (r + r1) / 2); assert (H18 := H14 0%nat);
      assert (H20 := H19 0%nat); unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval in H18, H20;
      simpl in H18; simpl in H20; rewrite <- (H18 (Nat.lt_0_succ _) x).
    { rewrite <- (H20 (Nat.lt_0_succ _) x).
      { reflexivity. }
      assert (H21 := H13 0%nat (Nat.lt_0_succ _)); simpl in H21; elim H21; intro;
        [ idtac | elim H7; assumption ]; unfold x;
        lra. }
    rewrite <- H6; assert (H21 := H13 0%nat (Nat.lt_0_succ _)); simpl in H21; elim H21;
      intro; [ idtac | elim H7; assumption ]; unfold x;
      lra. }
  assert (H8 : r1 <= s2). {
    eapply StepFun_P13.
    - apply H4.
    - apply H2.
    - unfold adapted_couple_opt; split.
      + apply H.
      + rewrite H5 in H3; apply H3.
  }
  elim H7; intro.
  2:{ simpl; rewrite H9; unfold Rminus; rewrite Rplus_opp_r;
      rewrite Rmult_0_r; rewrite Rplus_0_l;
      change
        (Int_SF lf1 (cons r1 r2) = Int_SF (cons r4 lf2) (cons s1 (cons s2 s3)))
      ; eapply H0.
      - apply H1.
      - assert (H10 : r = a).
        + unfold adapted_couple in H2; decompose [and] H2; clear H2; simpl in H12;
            rewrite H12; apply Hyp_min.
        + rewrite <- H9; rewrite H10; apply StepFun_P7 with a r r3;
            [ apply H1
            | pattern a at 2; rewrite <- H10; pattern r at 2; rewrite H9;
              apply H2 ].
      - rewrite H5 in H3; unfold adapted_couple_opt; split; assumption. }
  simpl; elim H8; intro.
  { replace (r4 * (s2 - s1)) with (r3 * (r1 - r) + r3 * (s2 - r1));
      [ idtac | rewrite H9; rewrite H6; ring ].
    rewrite Rplus_assoc; apply Rplus_eq_compat_l;
      change
        (Int_SF lf1 (cons r1 r2) = Int_SF (cons r3 lf2) (cons r1 (cons s2 s3)))
    ; apply H0 with r1 b.
    { unfold adapted_couple in H2; decompose [and] H2; clear H2;
        replace b with (Rmax a b);
      rewrite <- H12; apply RList_P7;
        [ assumption | simpl; right; left; reflexivity ]. }
    { eapply StepFun_P7.
      - apply H1.
      - apply H2. }
    unfold adapted_couple_opt; split.
    { apply StepFun_P7 with a a r3.
      { apply H1. }
      unfold adapted_couple in H2, H; decompose [and] H2; decompose [and] H;
        clear H H2; assert (H20 : r = a).
      { simpl in H13; rewrite H13; apply Hyp_min. }
      unfold adapted_couple; repeat split.
      - unfold ordered_Rlist; intros; simpl in H; induction  i as [| i Hreci].
        { simpl; rewrite <- H20; apply (H11 0%nat).
          simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
        induction  i as [| i Hreci0].
        { simpl; assumption. }
        change (pos_Rl (cons s2 s3) i <= pos_Rl (cons s2 s3) (S i));
          apply (H15 (S i)); simpl; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption.
      - simpl; symmetry ; apply Hyp_min.
      - rewrite <- H17; reflexivity.
      - simpl in H19; simpl; rewrite H19; reflexivity.
      - intros; simpl in H; unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros;
          induction  i as [| i Hreci].
        { simpl; apply (H16 0%nat).
          { simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
          simpl in H2; rewrite <- H20 in H2; unfold open_interval;
            simpl; apply H2. }
        clear Hreci; induction  i as [| i Hreci].
        { simpl; simpl in H2; rewrite H9; apply (H21 0%nat).
          { simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
          unfold open_interval; simpl; elim H2; intros; split.
          { apply Rle_lt_trans with r1; try assumption; rewrite <- H6; apply (H11 0%nat);
              simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
          assumption. }
        clear Hreci; simpl; apply (H21 (S i)).
        { simpl; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption. }
        unfold open_interval; apply H2. }
    elim H3; clear H3; intros; split.
    { rewrite H9;
      change
        (forall i:nat,
            (i < pred (length (cons r4 lf2)))%nat ->
            pos_Rl (cons r4 lf2) i <> pos_Rl (cons r4 lf2) (S i) \/
              f (pos_Rl (cons s1 (cons s2 s3)) (S i)) <> pos_Rl (cons r4 lf2) i)
      ; rewrite <- H5; apply H3. }
    rewrite H5 in H11; intros; simpl in H12; induction  i as [| i Hreci].
    { simpl; red; intro; rewrite H13 in H10;
      elim (Rlt_irrefl _ H10). }
    clear Hreci; apply (H11 (S i)); simpl; apply H12. }
  rewrite H9; rewrite H10; rewrite H6; apply Rplus_eq_compat_l; rewrite <- H10;
    apply H0 with r1 b.
  { unfold adapted_couple in H2; decompose [and] H2; clear H2;
    replace b with (Rmax a b).
    rewrite <- H12; apply RList_P7;
    [ assumption | simpl; right; left; reflexivity ]. }
  { eapply StepFun_P7.
    - apply H1.
    - apply H2. }
  unfold adapted_couple_opt; split.
  { apply StepFun_P7 with a a r3.
    { apply H1. }
    unfold adapted_couple in H2, H; decompose [and] H2; decompose [and] H;
      clear H H2; assert (H20 : r = a).
    { simpl in H13; rewrite H13; apply Hyp_min. }
    unfold adapted_couple; repeat split.
    -  unfold ordered_Rlist; intros; simpl in H; induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; rewrite <- H20; apply (H11 0%nat); simpl;
          apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
      rewrite H10; apply (H15 (S i)); simpl; assumption.
    - simpl; symmetry ; apply Hyp_min.
    - rewrite <- H17; rewrite H10; reflexivity.
    - simpl in H19; simpl; apply H19.
    - intros; simpl in H; unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros;
        induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; apply (H16 0%nat).
        { simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
        simpl in H2; rewrite <- H20 in H2; unfold open_interval;
          simpl; apply H2. }
      clear Hreci; simpl; apply (H21 (S i)).
      { simpl; assumption. }
      rewrite <- H10; unfold open_interval; apply H2. }
  elim H3; clear H3; intros; split.
  - rewrite H5 in H3; intros; apply (H3 (S i)).
    simpl; replace (length lf2) with (S (pred (length lf2))).
    { apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; apply H12. }
    apply Nat.lt_succ_pred with 0%nat; apply Nat.neq_0_lt_0; red;
    intro; rewrite H13 in H12; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H12).
  - intros; simpl in H12; rewrite H10; rewrite H5 in H11; apply (H11 (S i));
    simpl; apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; apply H12.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P15 :
  forall (f:R -> R) (l1 l2 lf1 lf2:list R) (a b:R),
    adapted_couple f a b l1 lf1 ->
    adapted_couple_opt f a b l2 lf2 -> Int_SF lf1 l1 = Int_SF lf2 l2.
Proof.
  intros; destruct (Rle_dec a b) as [Hle|Hnle];
    [ apply (StepFun_P14 Hle H H0)
      | assert (H1 : b <= a);
        [ auto with real
          | eapply StepFun_P14;
            [ apply H1 | apply StepFun_P2; apply H | apply StepFun_P12; apply H0 ] ] ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P16 :
  forall (f:R -> R) (l lf:list R) (a b:R),
    adapted_couple f a b l lf ->
    exists l' : list R,
      (exists lf' : list R, adapted_couple_opt f a b l' lf').
Proof.
  intros; destruct (Rle_dec a b) as [Hle|Hnle];
    [ apply (StepFun_P10 Hle H)
      | assert (H1 : b <= a);
        [ auto with real
          | assert (H2 := StepFun_P10 H1 (StepFun_P2 H)); elim H2;
            intros l' [lf' H3]; exists l'; exists lf'; apply StepFun_P12;
              assumption ] ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P17 :
  forall (f:R -> R) (l1 l2 lf1 lf2:list R) (a b:R),
    adapted_couple f a b l1 lf1 ->
    adapted_couple f a b l2 lf2 -> Int_SF lf1 l1 = Int_SF lf2 l2.
Proof.
  intros; elim (StepFun_P16 H); intros l' [lf' H1]; rewrite (StepFun_P15 H H1);
    rewrite (StepFun_P15 H0 H1); reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P18 :
  forall a b c:R, RiemannInt_SF (mkStepFun (StepFun_P4 a b c)) = c * (b - a).
Proof.
  intros; unfold RiemannInt_SF; case (Rle_dec a b); intro.
  - replace
      (Int_SF (subdivision_val (mkStepFun (StepFun_P4 a b c)))
              (subdivision (mkStepFun (StepFun_P4 a b c)))) with
      (Int_SF (cons c nil) (cons a (cons b nil)));
      [ simpl; ring
      | apply StepFun_P17 with (fct_cte c) a b;
        [ apply StepFun_P3; assumption
        | apply (StepFun_P1 (mkStepFun (StepFun_P4 a b c))) ] ].
  - replace
      (Int_SF (subdivision_val (mkStepFun (StepFun_P4 a b c)))
              (subdivision (mkStepFun (StepFun_P4 a b c)))) with
      (Int_SF (cons c nil) (cons b (cons a nil)));
      [ simpl; ring
      | apply StepFun_P17 with (fct_cte c) a b;
        [ apply StepFun_P2; apply StepFun_P3; auto with real
        | apply (StepFun_P1 (mkStepFun (StepFun_P4 a b c))) ] ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P19 :
  forall (l1:list R) (f g:R -> R) (l:R),
    Int_SF (FF l1 (fun x:R => f x + l * g x)) l1 =
    Int_SF (FF l1 f) l1 + l * Int_SF (FF l1 g) l1.
Proof.
  intros; induction  l1 as [| r l1 Hrecl1];
    [ simpl; ring
      | induction  l1 as [| r0 l1 Hrecl0]; simpl;
        [ ring | simpl in Hrecl1; rewrite Hrecl1; ring ] ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P20 :
  forall (l:list R) (f:R -> R),
    (0 < length l)%nat -> length l = S (length (FF l f)).
Proof.
  intros l f H; induction l;
    [ elim (Nat.lt_irrefl _ H)
      | simpl; rewrite RList_P18; rewrite RList_P14; reflexivity ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P21 :
  forall (a b:R) (f:R -> R) (l:list R),
    is_subdivision f a b l -> adapted_couple f a b l (FF l f).
Proof.
  intros * (x & H & H1 & H0 & H2 & H4).
  repeat split; try assumption.
  - apply StepFun_P20; rewrite H2; apply Nat.lt_0_succ.
  - intros; assert (H5 := H4 _ H3); unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval in H5;
      unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros;
      induction  l as [| r l Hrecl].
    + discriminate.
    + unfold FF; rewrite RList_P12.
      * simpl;
          change (f x0 = f (pos_Rl (mid_Rlist (cons r l) r) (S i)));
          rewrite RList_P13; try assumption; rewrite (H5 x0 H6);
          rewrite H5.
        -- reflexivity.
        -- lra.
      * rewrite RList_P14; simpl in H3; apply H3.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P22 :
  forall (a b:R) (f g:R -> R) (lf lg:list R),
    a <= b ->
    is_subdivision f a b lf ->
    is_subdivision g a b lg -> is_subdivision f a b (cons_ORlist lf lg).
Proof.
  unfold is_subdivision; intros a b f g lf lg Hyp X X0; elim X; elim X0;
    clear X X0; intros lg0 p lf0 p0; assert (Hyp_min : Rmin a b = a).
  { unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec a b) with Hyp; reflexivity. }
  assert (Hyp_max : Rmax a b = b).
  { unfold Rmax; decide (Rle_dec a b) with Hyp; reflexivity. }
  apply existT with (FF (cons_ORlist lf lg) f); unfold adapted_couple in p, p0;
    decompose [and] p; decompose [and] p0; clear p p0;
      rewrite Hyp_min in H6; rewrite Hyp_min in H1; rewrite Hyp_max in H0;
        rewrite Hyp_max in H5; unfold adapted_couple;
    repeat split.
  - apply RList_P2; assumption.
  - rewrite Hyp_min; symmetry ; apply Rle_antisym.
    2:{ induction  lf as [| r lf Hreclf].
        { simpl; right; assumption. }
        assert (H8 : In a (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)).
        { elim (RList_P9 (cons r lf) lg a); intros; apply H10; left;
          elim (RList_P3 (cons r lf) a); intros; apply H12;
          exists 0%nat; split;
          [ symmetry ; assumption | simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ ]. }
        apply RList_P5; [ apply RList_P2; assumption | assumption ]. }
    induction  lf as [| r lf Hreclf].
    { simpl; right; symmetry ; assumption. }
    assert
      (H10 :
        In (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg) 0) (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)).
    { elim
      (RList_P3 (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)
                (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg) 0)); intros _ H10;
      apply H10; exists 0%nat; split;
      [ reflexivity | rewrite RList_P11; simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ ]. }
    elim (RList_P9 (cons r lf) lg (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg) 0));
      intros H12 _; assert (H13 := H12 H10); elim H13; intro.
    { elim (RList_P3 (cons r lf) (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg) 0));
      intros H11 _; assert (H14 := H11 H8); elim H14; intros;
      elim H15; clear H15; intros; rewrite H15; rewrite <- H6;
      elim (RList_P6 (cons r lf)); intros; apply H17;
      [ assumption | apply Nat.le_0_l | assumption ]. }
    elim (RList_P3 lg (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg) 0)); intros H11 _;
      assert (H14 := H11 H8); elim H14; intros; elim H15;
      clear H15; intros; rewrite H15; rewrite <- H1; elim (RList_P6 lg);
      intros; apply H17; [ assumption | apply Nat.le_0_l | assumption ].
  - rewrite Hyp_max; apply Rle_antisym.
    2:{ induction  lf as [| r lf Hreclf].
        { simpl; right; symmetry ; assumption. }
        assert (H8 : In b (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)).
        { elim (RList_P9 (cons r lf) lg b); intros; apply H10; left;
          elim (RList_P3 (cons r lf) b); intros; apply H12;
          exists (pred (length (cons r lf))); split;
          [ symmetry ; assumption | simpl; apply Nat.lt_succ_diag_r ]. }
        apply RList_P7; [ apply RList_P2; assumption | assumption ]. }
    induction  lf as [| r lf Hreclf].
    { simpl; right; assumption. }
    assert
      (H8 :
        In
          (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)
                  (pred (length (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg))))
          (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)).
    { elim
      (RList_P3 (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)
                (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)
                        (pred (length (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)))));
      intros _ H10; apply H10;
      exists (pred (length (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)));
      split; [ reflexivity | rewrite RList_P11; simpl; apply Nat.lt_succ_diag_r ]. }
    elim
      (RList_P9 (cons r lf) lg
                (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)
                        (pred (length (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)))));
      intros H10 _.
    assert (H11 := H10 H8); elim H11; intro.
    { elim
      (RList_P3 (cons r lf)
                (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)
                        (pred (length (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)))));
      intros H13 _; assert (H14 := H13 H12); elim H14; intros;
      elim H15; clear H15; intros; rewrite H15; rewrite <- H5;
      elim (RList_P6 (cons r lf)); intros; apply H17;
      [ assumption
      | simpl; simpl in H14; apply Nat.lt_succ_r; assumption
      | simpl; apply Nat.lt_succ_diag_r ]. }
    elim
      (RList_P3 lg
                (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)
                        (pred (length (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)))));
      intros H13 _; assert (H14 := H13 H12); elim H14; intros;
      elim H15; clear H15; intros.
    rewrite H15; assert (H17 : length lg = S (pred (length lg))).
    { symmetry; apply Nat.lt_succ_pred with 0%nat.
      apply Nat.neq_0_lt_0; red; intro;
      rewrite H17 in H16; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H16). }
    rewrite <- H0; elim (RList_P6 lg); intros; apply H18;
      [ assumption
      | rewrite H17 in H16; apply Nat.lt_succ_r; assumption
      | apply Nat.lt_pred_l; rewrite H17; intros Heq; discriminate ].
  - apply StepFun_P20; rewrite RList_P11; rewrite H2; rewrite H7; simpl;
      apply Nat.lt_0_succ.
  - intros; unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros;
      cut
        (exists l : R,
            constant_D_eq f
                          (open_interval (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i)
                                         (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) (S i))) l).
    + intros; elim H11; clear H11; intros; assert (H12 := H11);
        assert
          (Hyp_cons :
            exists r : R, (exists r0 : list R, cons_ORlist lf lg = cons r r0)).
      { apply RList_P19; red; intro; rewrite H13 in H8; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H8). }
      elim Hyp_cons; clear Hyp_cons; intros r [r0 Hyp_cons]; rewrite Hyp_cons;
        unfold FF; rewrite RList_P12.
      2:{ rewrite RList_P14; rewrite Hyp_cons in H8; simpl in H8; apply H8. }
      change (f x = f (pos_Rl (mid_Rlist (cons r r0) r) (S i)));
        rewrite <- Hyp_cons; rewrite RList_P13.
      2:{ apply H8. }
      assert (H13 := RList_P2 _ _ H _ H8); elim H13; intro.
      2:{ elim H10; intros; rewrite H14 in H15;
          elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rlt_trans _ _ _ H16 H15)). }
      unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval in H11, H12; rewrite (H11 x H10);
        assert
          (H15 :
            pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i <
              (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i + pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) (S i)) / 2 <
              pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) (S i)) by lra.
      rewrite (H11 _ H15); reflexivity.
    + assert (H11 : a < b). {
        apply Rle_lt_trans with (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i).
        2:apply Rlt_le_trans with (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) (S i)).
        - rewrite <- H6; rewrite <- (RList_P15 lf lg).
          + elim (RList_P6 (cons_ORlist lf lg)); intros; apply H11.
            * apply RList_P2; assumption.
            * apply Nat.le_0_l.
            * apply Nat.lt_trans with (pred (length (cons_ORlist lf lg)));
                [ assumption
                | apply Nat.lt_pred_l; apply Nat.neq_0_lt_0; apply Nat.neq_0_lt_0; red; intro;
                  rewrite H13 in H8; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H8) ].
          + assumption.
          + assumption.
          + rewrite H1; assumption.
        - elim H10; intros; apply Rlt_trans with x; assumption.
        - rewrite <- H5; rewrite <- (RList_P16 lf lg); try assumption.
          { elim (RList_P6 (cons_ORlist lf lg)); intros; apply H11.
            - apply RList_P2; assumption.
            - apply Nat.lt_succ_r; apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption.
            - apply Nat.lt_pred_l; red; intro; rewrite H13 in H8;
                elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H8). }
          rewrite H0; assumption.
      }
      set
        (I :=
           fun j:nat =>
             pos_Rl lf j <= pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i /\ (j < length lf)%nat);
      assert (H12 : Nbound I).
      { unfold Nbound; exists (length lf); intros; unfold I in H12; elim H12;
        intros; apply Nat.lt_le_incl; assumption. }
      assert (H13 :  exists n : nat, I n). {
        exists 0%nat; unfold I; split.
        2:{ apply Nat.neq_0_lt_0; red; intro; rewrite H13 in H5;
            rewrite <- H6 in H11; rewrite <- H5 in H11; elim (Rlt_irrefl _ H11). }
        apply Rle_trans with (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) 0).
        { right; symmetry .
          apply RList_P15; try assumption; rewrite H1; assumption. }
        elim (RList_P6 (cons_ORlist lf lg)); intros; apply H13.
        - apply RList_P2; assumption.
        - apply Nat.le_0_l.
        - lia.
      }
      assert (H14 := Nzorn H13 H12); elim H14; clear H14; intros x0 H14;
        exists (pos_Rl lf0 x0); unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval;
        intros; assert (H16 := H9 x0); assert (H17 : (x0 < pred (length lf))%nat).
      { elim H14; clear H14; intros; unfold I in H14; elim H14; clear H14; intros;
        apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; replace (S (pred (length lf))) with (length lf).
        { inversion H18.
          2: apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption.
          assert (x0 = pred (length lf)). {
            rewrite <- H20; reflexivity.
          }
          rewrite H19 in H14; rewrite H5 in H14;
            cut (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i < b).
          - intro; elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rle_lt_trans _ _ _ H14 H21)).
          - apply Rlt_le_trans with (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) (S i)).
            { elim H10; intros; apply Rlt_trans with x; assumption. }
            rewrite <- H5;
              apply Rle_trans with
              (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) (pred (length (cons_ORlist lf lg)))).
            + elim (RList_P6 (cons_ORlist lf lg)); intros; apply H21.
              * apply RList_P2; assumption.
              * apply Nat.lt_succ_r; apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption.
              * apply Nat.lt_pred_l; red; intro; rewrite H23 in H8;
                  elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H8).
            + right; apply RList_P16; try assumption; rewrite H0; assumption. }
        symmetry; apply Nat.lt_succ_pred with 0%nat; apply Nat.neq_0_lt_0; red; intro;
          rewrite H19 in H18; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H18). }
      assert (H18 := H16 H17); unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval in H18;
        rewrite (H18 x1).
      { reflexivity. }
      elim H15; clear H15; intros; elim H14; clear H14; intros; unfold I in H14;
        elim H14; clear H14; intros; split.
      { apply Rle_lt_trans with (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i); assumption. }
      apply Rlt_le_trans with (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) (S i)).
      { assumption. }
      assert (H22 : (S x0 < length lf)%nat) by lia.
      elim (Rle_dec (pos_Rl lf (S x0)) (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i)); intro a0.
      * assert (H23 : (S x0 <= x0)%nat).
        { apply H20; unfold I; split; assumption. }
        elim (Nat.nle_succ_diag_l _ H23).
      * assert (H23 : pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i < pos_Rl lf (S x0)) by auto with real.
        clear a0; apply RList_P17; try assumption.
        { apply RList_P2; assumption. }
        elim (RList_P9 lf lg (pos_Rl lf (S x0))); intros; apply H25; left;
          elim (RList_P3 lf (pos_Rl lf (S x0))); intros; apply H27;
          exists (S x0); split; [ reflexivity | apply H22 ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P23 :
  forall (a b:R) (f g:R -> R) (lf lg:list R),
    is_subdivision f a b lf ->
    is_subdivision g a b lg -> is_subdivision f a b (cons_ORlist lf lg).
Proof.
  intros; case (Rle_dec a b); intro;
    [ apply StepFun_P22 with g; assumption
      | apply StepFun_P5; apply StepFun_P22 with g;
        [ auto with real
          | apply StepFun_P5; assumption
          | apply StepFun_P5; assumption ] ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P24 :
  forall (a b:R) (f g:R -> R) (lf lg:list R),
    a <= b ->
    is_subdivision f a b lf ->
    is_subdivision g a b lg -> is_subdivision g a b (cons_ORlist lf lg).
Proof.
  unfold is_subdivision; intros a b f g lf lg Hyp X X0; elim X; elim X0;
    clear X X0; intros lg0 p lf0 p0; assert (Hyp_min : Rmin a b = a).
  { unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec a b) with Hyp; reflexivity. }
  assert (Hyp_max : Rmax a b = b).
  { unfold Rmax; decide (Rle_dec a b) with Hyp; reflexivity. }
  apply existT with (FF (cons_ORlist lf lg) g); unfold adapted_couple in p, p0;
    decompose [and] p; decompose [and] p0; clear p p0;
    rewrite Hyp_min in H1; rewrite Hyp_min in H6; rewrite Hyp_max in H0;
    rewrite Hyp_max in H5; unfold adapted_couple;
    repeat split.
  - apply RList_P2; assumption.
  - rewrite Hyp_min; symmetry ; apply Rle_antisym.
    { induction  lf as [| r lf Hreclf].
      { simpl; right; symmetry ; assumption. }
      assert
        (H10 :
          In (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg) 0) (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)).
      { elim
          (RList_P3 (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)
                    (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg) 0)); intros _ H10;
          apply H10; exists 0%nat; split;
          [ reflexivity | rewrite RList_P11; simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ ]. }
      elim (RList_P9 (cons r lf) lg (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg) 0));
        intros H12 _; assert (H13 := H12 H10); elim H13; intro.
      { elim (RList_P3 (cons r lf) (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg) 0));
          intros H11 _; assert (H14 := H11 H8); elim H14; intros;
          elim H15; clear H15; intros; rewrite H15; rewrite <- H6;
          elim (RList_P6 (cons r lf)); intros; apply H17;
          [ assumption | apply Nat.le_0_l | assumption ]. }
      elim (RList_P3 lg (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg) 0)); intros H11 _;
        assert (H14 := H11 H8); elim H14; intros; elim H15;
        clear H15; intros; rewrite H15; rewrite <- H1; elim (RList_P6 lg);
        intros; apply H17; [ assumption | apply Nat.le_0_l | assumption ]. }
    induction  lf as [| r lf Hreclf].
    { simpl; right; assumption. }
    assert (H8 : In a (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)).
    { elim (RList_P9 (cons r lf) lg a); intros; apply H10; left;
        elim (RList_P3 (cons r lf) a); intros; apply H12;
        exists 0%nat; split;
        [ symmetry ; assumption | simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ ]. }
    apply RList_P5; [ apply RList_P2; assumption | assumption ].
  - rewrite Hyp_max; apply Rle_antisym.
    2:{ induction  lf as [| r lf Hreclf].
        { simpl; right; symmetry ; assumption. }
        assert (H8 : In b (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)).
        { elim (RList_P9 (cons r lf) lg b); intros; apply H10; left;
            elim (RList_P3 (cons r lf) b); intros; apply H12;
            exists (pred (length (cons r lf))); split;
            [ symmetry ; assumption | simpl; apply Nat.lt_succ_diag_r ]. }
        apply RList_P7; [ apply RList_P2; assumption | assumption ]. }
    induction  lf as [| r lf Hreclf].
    { simpl; right; assumption. }
    assert
      (H8 :
        In
          (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)
                  (pred (length (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg))))
          (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)).
    { elim
        (RList_P3 (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)
                  (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)
                          (pred (length (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)))));
        intros _ H10; apply H10;
        exists (pred (length (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)));
        split; [ reflexivity | rewrite RList_P11; simpl; apply Nat.lt_succ_diag_r ]. }
    elim
      (RList_P9 (cons r lf) lg
                (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)
                        (pred (length (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)))));
      intros H10 _; assert (H11 := H10 H8); elim H11; intro.
    { elim
        (RList_P3 (cons r lf)
                  (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)
                          (pred (length (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)))));
        intros H13 _; assert (H14 := H13 H12); elim H14; intros;
        elim H15; clear H15; intros; rewrite H15; rewrite <- H5;
        elim (RList_P6 (cons r lf)); intros; apply H17;
        [ assumption
        | simpl; simpl in H14; apply Nat.lt_succ_r; assumption
        | simpl; apply Nat.lt_succ_diag_r ]. }
    elim
      (RList_P3 lg
                (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)
                        (pred (length (cons_ORlist (cons r lf) lg)))));
      intros H13 _; assert (H14 := H13 H12); elim H14; intros;
      elim H15; clear H15; intros; rewrite H15;
      assert (H17 : length lg = S (pred (length lg))).
    { symmetry; apply Nat.lt_succ_pred with 0%nat; apply Nat.neq_0_lt_0; red; intro;
        rewrite H17 in H16; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H16). }
    rewrite <- H0; elim (RList_P6 lg); intros; apply H18;
      [ assumption
      | rewrite H17 in H16; apply Nat.lt_succ_r; assumption
      | apply Nat.lt_pred_l; rewrite H17; intros Heq; discriminate ].
  - apply StepFun_P20; rewrite RList_P11; rewrite H7; rewrite H2; simpl;
      apply Nat.lt_0_succ.
  - unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros;
      cut
        (exists l : R,
            constant_D_eq g
                          (open_interval (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i)
                                         (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) (S i))) l).
    { intros; elim H11; clear H11; intros; assert (H12 := H11);
        assert
          (Hyp_cons :
            exists r : R, (exists r0 : list R, cons_ORlist lf lg = cons r r0)).
      { apply RList_P19; red; intro; rewrite H13 in H8; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H8). }
      elim Hyp_cons; clear Hyp_cons; intros r [r0 Hyp_cons]; rewrite Hyp_cons;
        unfold FF; rewrite RList_P12.
      2:{ rewrite RList_P14; rewrite Hyp_cons in H8; simpl in H8; apply H8. }
      change (g x = g (pos_Rl (mid_Rlist (cons r r0) r) (S i)));
        rewrite <- Hyp_cons; rewrite RList_P13.
      2:{ apply H8. }
      assert (H13 := RList_P2 _ _ H _ H8); elim H13; intro.
      2:{ elim H10; intros; rewrite H14 in H15;
          elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rlt_trans _ _ _ H16 H15)). }
      unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval in H11, H12; rewrite (H11 x H10);
        rewrite H11.
      { reflexivity. }
      lra. }
    assert (H11 : a < b).
    { apply Rle_lt_trans with (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i).
      { rewrite <- H6; rewrite <- (RList_P15 lf lg); try assumption.
        { elim (RList_P6 (cons_ORlist lf lg)); intros; apply H11.
          { apply RList_P2; assumption. }
          { apply Nat.le_0_l. }
          apply Nat.lt_trans with (pred (length (cons_ORlist lf lg)));
            [ assumption
            | apply Nat.lt_pred_l; red; intro;
              rewrite H13 in H8; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H8) ]. }
        rewrite H1; assumption. }
      apply Rlt_le_trans with (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) (S i)).
      { elim H10; intros; apply Rlt_trans with x; assumption. }
      rewrite <- H5; rewrite <- (RList_P16 lf lg); try assumption.
      { elim (RList_P6 (cons_ORlist lf lg)); intros; apply H11.
        { apply RList_P2; assumption. }
        { apply Nat.lt_succ_r; apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption. }
        apply Nat.lt_pred_l; red; intro; rewrite H13 in H8;
          elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H8). }
      rewrite H0; assumption. }
    set
      (I :=
         fun j:nat =>
           pos_Rl lg j <= pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i /\ (j < length lg)%nat);
      assert (H12 : Nbound I).
    { unfold Nbound; exists (length lg); intros; unfold I in H12; elim H12;
        intros; apply Nat.lt_le_incl; assumption. }
    assert (H13 :  exists n : nat, I n).
    { exists 0%nat; unfold I; split.
      { apply Rle_trans with (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) 0).
        { right; symmetry ; rewrite H1; rewrite <- H6; apply RList_P15;
            try assumption; rewrite H1; assumption. }
        elim (RList_P6 (cons_ORlist lf lg)); intros; apply H13;
          [ apply RList_P2; assumption
          | apply Nat.le_0_l
          | apply Nat.lt_trans with (pred (length (cons_ORlist lf lg)));
            [ assumption
            | apply Nat.lt_pred_l; red; intro;
              rewrite H15 in H8; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H8) ] ]. }
      apply Nat.neq_0_lt_0; red; intro; rewrite H13 in H0;
        rewrite <- H1 in H11; rewrite <- H0 in H11; elim (Rlt_irrefl _ H11). }
    assert (H14 := Nzorn H13 H12); elim H14; clear H14; intros x0 H14;
      exists (pos_Rl lg0 x0); unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval;
      intros; assert (H16 := H4 x0); assert (H17 : (x0 < pred (length lg))%nat).
    { elim H14; clear H14; intros; unfold I in H14; elim H14; clear H14; intros;
        apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; replace (S (pred (length lg))) with (length lg).
      { inversion H18.
        2: apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption.
        cut (x0 = pred (length lg)).
        { intro; rewrite H19 in H14; rewrite H0 in H14;
            cut (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i < b).
          { intro; elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rle_lt_trans _ _ _ H14 H21)). }
          apply Rlt_le_trans with (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) (S i)).
          { elim H10; intros; apply Rlt_trans with x; assumption. }
          rewrite <- H0;
            apply Rle_trans with
            (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) (pred (length (cons_ORlist lf lg)))).
          { elim (RList_P6 (cons_ORlist lf lg)); intros; apply H21.
            { apply RList_P2; assumption. }
            { apply Nat.lt_succ_r; apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption. }
            apply Nat.lt_pred_l; red; intro; rewrite H23 in H8;
              elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H8). }
          right; rewrite H0; rewrite <- H5; apply RList_P16; try assumption.
          rewrite H0; assumption. }
        rewrite <- H20; reflexivity. }
      symmetry; apply Nat.lt_succ_pred with 0%nat; apply Nat.neq_0_lt_0; red; intro;
        rewrite H19 in H18; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H18). }
    assert (H18 := H16 H17); unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval in H18;
      rewrite (H18 x1).
    { reflexivity. }
    elim H15; clear H15; intros; elim H14; clear H14; intros; unfold I in H14;
      elim H14; clear H14; intros; split.
    { apply Rle_lt_trans with (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i); assumption. }
    apply Rlt_le_trans with (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) (S i)); try assumption.
    assert (H22 : (S x0 < length lg)%nat).
    { replace (length lg) with (S (pred (length lg))).
      { apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption. }
      apply Nat.lt_succ_pred with 0%nat; apply Nat.neq_0_lt_0; red;
        intro; rewrite H22 in H21; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H21). }
    elim (Rle_dec (pos_Rl lg (S x0)) (pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i)); intro a0.
    { assert (H23 : (S x0 <= x0)%nat);
        [ apply H20; unfold I; split; assumption | elim (Nat.nle_succ_diag_l _ H23) ]. }
    assert (H23 : pos_Rl (cons_ORlist lf lg) i < pos_Rl lg (S x0)) by auto with real.
    clear a0; apply RList_P17; try assumption;
      [ apply RList_P2; assumption
      | elim (RList_P9 lf lg (pos_Rl lg (S x0))); intros; apply H25; right;
        elim (RList_P3 lg (pos_Rl lg (S x0))); intros;
        apply H27; exists (S x0); split; [ reflexivity | apply H22 ] ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P25 :
  forall (a b:R) (f g:R -> R) (lf lg:list R),
    is_subdivision f a b lf ->
    is_subdivision g a b lg -> is_subdivision g a b (cons_ORlist lf lg).
Proof.
  intros a b f g lf lg H H0; case (Rle_dec a b); intro;
    [ apply StepFun_P24 with f; assumption
      | apply StepFun_P5; apply StepFun_P24 with f;
        [ auto with real
          | apply StepFun_P5; assumption
          | apply StepFun_P5; assumption ] ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P26 :
  forall (a b l:R) (f g:R -> R) (l1:list R),
    is_subdivision f a b l1 ->
    is_subdivision g a b l1 ->
    is_subdivision (fun x:R => f x + l * g x) a b l1.
Proof.
  intros a b l f g l1 (x0,(H0,(H1,(H2,(H3,H4)))))
         (x,(_,(_,(_,(_,H9))))).
  exists (FF l1 (fun x:R => f x + l * g x)); repeat split.
  1,2,3:assumption.
  - apply StepFun_P20; rewrite H3; auto with arith.
  - intros i H8 x1 H10; unfold open_interval in H10, H9, H4;
      rewrite (H9 _ H8 _ H10); rewrite (H4 _ H8 _ H10);
      assert (H11 : l1 <> nil).
    { red; intro H11; rewrite H11 in H8; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H8). }
    destruct (RList_P19 _ H11) as (r,(r0,H12));
      rewrite H12; unfold FF;
      change
        (pos_Rl x0 i + l * pos_Rl x i =
           pos_Rl
             (map (fun x2:R => f x2 + l * g x2) (mid_Rlist (cons r r0) r))
             (S i)); rewrite RList_P12.
    { rewrite RList_P13.
      { rewrite <- H12; rewrite (H9 _ H8); try rewrite (H4 _ H8); lra. }
      rewrite <- H12; assumption. }
    rewrite RList_P14; simpl; rewrite H12 in H8; simpl in H8;
      apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; apply H8.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P27 :
  forall (a b l:R) (f g:R -> R) (lf lg:list R),
    is_subdivision f a b lf ->
    is_subdivision g a b lg ->
    is_subdivision (fun x:R => f x + l * g x) a b (cons_ORlist lf lg).
Proof.
  intros a b l f g lf lg H H0; apply StepFun_P26;
    [ apply StepFun_P23 with g; assumption
      | apply StepFun_P25 with f; assumption ].
Qed.

(** The set of step functions on [a,b] is a vectorial space *)
Lemma StepFun_P28 :
  forall (a b l:R) (f g:StepFun a b), IsStepFun (fun x:R => f x + l * g x) a b.
Proof.
  intros a b l f g; unfold IsStepFun; assert (H := pre f);
    assert (H0 := pre g); unfold IsStepFun in H, H0; elim H;
      elim H0; intros; apply existT with (cons_ORlist x0 x);
        apply StepFun_P27; assumption.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P29 :
  forall (a b:R) (f:StepFun a b), is_subdivision f a b (subdivision f).
Proof.
  intros a b f; unfold is_subdivision;
    apply existT with (subdivision_val f); apply StepFun_P1.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P30 :
  forall (a b l:R) (f g:StepFun a b),
    RiemannInt_SF (mkStepFun (StepFun_P28 l f g)) =
    RiemannInt_SF f + l * RiemannInt_SF g.
Proof.
  intros a b l f g; unfold RiemannInt_SF; case (Rle_dec a b);
    (intro;
      replace
      (Int_SF (subdivision_val (mkStepFun (StepFun_P28 l f g)))
        (subdivision (mkStepFun (StepFun_P28 l f g)))) with
      (Int_SF
        (FF (cons_ORlist (subdivision f) (subdivision g))
          (fun x:R => f x + l * g x))
        (cons_ORlist (subdivision f) (subdivision g)));
      [ rewrite StepFun_P19;
        replace
        (Int_SF (FF (cons_ORlist (subdivision f) (subdivision g)) f)
          (cons_ORlist (subdivision f) (subdivision g))) with
        (Int_SF (subdivision_val f) (subdivision f));
        [ replace
          (Int_SF (FF (cons_ORlist (subdivision f) (subdivision g)) g)
            (cons_ORlist (subdivision f) (subdivision g))) with
          (Int_SF (subdivision_val g) (subdivision g));
          [ ring
            | apply StepFun_P17 with (fe g) a b;
              [ apply StepFun_P1
                | apply StepFun_P21; apply StepFun_P25 with (fe f);
                  apply StepFun_P29 ] ]
          | apply StepFun_P17 with (fe f) a b;
            [ apply StepFun_P1
              | apply StepFun_P21; apply StepFun_P23 with (fe g);
                apply StepFun_P29 ] ]
        | apply StepFun_P17 with (fun x:R => f x + l * g x) a b;
          [ apply StepFun_P21; apply StepFun_P27; apply StepFun_P29
            | apply (StepFun_P1 (mkStepFun (StepFun_P28 l f g))) ] ]).
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P31 :
  forall (a b:R) (f:R -> R) (l lf:list R),
    adapted_couple f a b l lf ->
    adapted_couple (fun x:R => Rabs (f x)) a b l (map Rabs lf).
Proof.
  unfold adapted_couple; intros; decompose [and] H; clear H;
    repeat split; try assumption.
  - symmetry ; rewrite H3; rewrite RList_P18; reflexivity.
  - intros; unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval;
    unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval in H5; intros;
      rewrite (H5 _ H _ H4); rewrite RList_P12;
        [ reflexivity | rewrite H3 in H; simpl in H; apply H ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P32 :
  forall (a b:R) (f:StepFun a b), IsStepFun (fun x:R => Rabs (f x)) a b.
Proof.
  intros a b f; unfold IsStepFun; apply existT with (subdivision f);
    unfold is_subdivision;
      apply existT with (map Rabs (subdivision_val f));
        apply StepFun_P31; apply StepFun_P1.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P33 :
  forall l2 l1:list R,
    ordered_Rlist l1 -> Rabs (Int_SF l2 l1) <= Int_SF (map Rabs l2) l1.
Proof.
  induction l2 as [ | r r0 H]; intros.
  - simpl; rewrite Rabs_R0; right; reflexivity.
  - simpl; induction  l1 as [| r1 l1 Hrecl1].
    + rewrite Rabs_R0; right; reflexivity.
    + induction  l1 as [| r2 l1 Hrecl0].
      * rewrite Rabs_R0; right; reflexivity.
      * apply Rle_trans with (Rabs (r * (r2 - r1)) + Rabs (Int_SF r0 (cons r2 l1))).
        -- apply Rabs_triang.
        -- rewrite Rabs_mult; rewrite (Rabs_right (r2 - r1));
             [ apply Rplus_le_compat_l; apply H; apply RList_P4 with r1; assumption
             | apply Rge_minus; apply Rle_ge; apply (H0 0%nat); simpl;
               apply Nat.lt_0_succ ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P34 :
  forall (a b:R) (f:StepFun a b),
    a <= b ->
    Rabs (RiemannInt_SF f) <= RiemannInt_SF (mkStepFun (StepFun_P32 f)).
Proof.
  intros; unfold RiemannInt_SF; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H.
  replace
  (Int_SF (subdivision_val (mkStepFun (StepFun_P32 f)))
    (subdivision (mkStepFun (StepFun_P32 f)))) with
  (Int_SF (map Rabs (subdivision_val f)) (subdivision f)).
  - apply StepFun_P33; assert (H0 := StepFun_P29 f); unfold is_subdivision in H0;
      elim H0; intros; unfold adapted_couple in p; decompose [and] p;
      assumption.
  - apply StepFun_P17 with (fun x:R => Rabs (f x)) a b;
      [ apply StepFun_P31; apply StepFun_P1
      | apply (StepFun_P1 (mkStepFun (StepFun_P32 f))) ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P35 :
  forall (l:list R) (a b:R) (f g:R -> R),
    ordered_Rlist l ->
    pos_Rl l 0 = a ->
    pos_Rl l (pred (length l)) = b ->
    (forall x:R, a < x < b -> f x <= g x) ->
    Int_SF (FF l f) l <= Int_SF (FF l g) l.
Proof.
  induction l as [ | r r0 H]; intros.
  { right; reflexivity. }
  simpl; induction  r0 as [| r0 r1 Hrecr0].
  { right; reflexivity. }
  simpl; apply Rplus_le_compat.
  2:{ simpl in H; apply H with r0 b.
      - apply RList_P4 with r; assumption.
      - reflexivity.
      - rewrite <- H2; reflexivity.
      - intros; apply H3; elim H4; intros; split; try assumption.
        apply Rle_lt_trans with r0; try assumption.
        rewrite <- H1.
        simpl; apply (H0 0%nat); simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
  case (Req_dec r r0); intro.
  { rewrite H4; right; ring. }
  do 2 rewrite <- (Rmult_comm (r0 - r)); apply Rmult_le_compat_l.
  { apply Rge_le; apply Rge_minus; apply Rle_ge; apply (H0 0%nat); simpl;
      apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
  apply H3; split.
  { apply Rmult_lt_reg_l with 2.
    { prove_sup0. }
    unfold Rdiv; rewrite <- (Rmult_comm (/ 2)); rewrite <- Rmult_assoc;
      rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym.
    2:discrR.
    simpl in H1.
    assert (H6 := H0 0%nat (Nat.lt_0_succ _)).
    simpl in H6.
    lra. }
  apply Rmult_lt_reg_l with 2.
  { prove_sup0. }
  unfold Rdiv; rewrite <- (Rmult_comm (/ 2)); rewrite <- Rmult_assoc;
    rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym.
  2:discrR.
  rewrite Rmult_1_l; rewrite double; assert (H5 : r0 <= b).
  { replace b with
      (pos_Rl (cons r (cons r0 r1)) (pred (length (cons r (cons r0 r1))))).
    replace r0 with (pos_Rl (cons r (cons r0 r1)) 1).
    { elim (RList_P6 (cons r (cons r0 r1))); intros; apply H5.
      { assumption. }
      { simpl; lia. }
      simpl; apply Nat.lt_succ_diag_r. }
    reflexivity. }
  apply Rle_lt_trans with (r + b).
  { apply Rplus_le_compat_l; assumption. }
  rewrite (Rplus_comm r); apply Rplus_lt_compat_l.
  apply Rlt_le_trans with r0.
  { assert (H6 := H0 0%nat (Nat.lt_0_succ _)).
    simpl in H6. lra. }
  assumption.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P36 :
  forall (a b:R) (f g:StepFun a b) (l:list R),
    a <= b ->
    is_subdivision f a b l ->
    is_subdivision g a b l ->
    (forall x:R, a < x < b -> f x <= g x) ->
    RiemannInt_SF f <= RiemannInt_SF g.
Proof.
  intros; unfold RiemannInt_SF; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H.
  replace (Int_SF (subdivision_val f) (subdivision f)) with (Int_SF (FF l f) l).
  - replace (Int_SF (subdivision_val g) (subdivision g)) with (Int_SF (FF l g) l).
    + unfold is_subdivision in X; elim X; clear X; intros;
        unfold adapted_couple in p; decompose [and] p; clear p;
        assert (H5 : Rmin a b = a);
        [ unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H; reflexivity
        | assert (H7 : Rmax a b = b);
          [ unfold Rmax; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H; reflexivity
          | rewrite H5 in H3; rewrite H7 in H2; eapply StepFun_P35 with a b;
            assumption ] ].
    + apply StepFun_P17 with (fe g) a b;
        [ apply StepFun_P21; assumption | apply StepFun_P1 ].
  - apply StepFun_P17 with (fe f) a b;
      [ apply StepFun_P21; assumption | apply StepFun_P1 ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P37 :
  forall (a b:R) (f g:StepFun a b),
    a <= b ->
    (forall x:R, a < x < b -> f x <= g x) ->
    RiemannInt_SF f <= RiemannInt_SF g.
Proof.
  intros; eapply StepFun_P36; try assumption.
  - eapply StepFun_P25; apply StepFun_P29.
  - eapply StepFun_P23; apply StepFun_P29.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P38 :
  forall (l:list R) (a b:R) (f:R -> R),
    ordered_Rlist l ->
    pos_Rl l 0 = a ->
    pos_Rl l (pred (length l)) = b ->
    { g:StepFun a b |
      g b = f b /\
        (forall i:nat,
            (i < pred (length l))%nat ->
            constant_D_eq g (co_interval (pos_Rl l i) (pos_Rl l (S i)))
                          (f (pos_Rl l i))) }.
Proof.
  intros l a b f; generalize a; clear a; induction l as [|r l IHl].
  { intros a H H0 H1; simpl in H0; simpl in H1;
      exists (mkStepFun (StepFun_P4 a b (f b))); split.
    { reflexivity. }
    intros; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H2). }
  intros; destruct l as [| r1 l].
  { simpl in H1; simpl in H0; exists (mkStepFun (StepFun_P4 a b (f b))); split.
    { reflexivity. }
    intros i H2; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H2). }
  intros; assert (H2 : ordered_Rlist (cons r1 l)).
  { apply RList_P4 with r; assumption. }
  assert (H3 : pos_Rl (cons r1 l) 0 = r1).
  { reflexivity. }
  assert (H4 : pos_Rl (cons r1 l) (pred (length (cons r1 l))) = b).
  { rewrite <- H1; reflexivity. }
  elim (IHl r1 H2 H3 H4); intros g [H5 H6].
  set
    (g' :=
       fun x:R => match Rle_dec r1 x with
               | left _ => g x
               | right _ => f a
               end).
  assert (H7 : r1 <= b).
  { rewrite <- H4; apply RList_P7; [ assumption | left; reflexivity ]. }
  assert (H8 : IsStepFun g' a b). {
    unfold IsStepFun; assert (H8 := pre g); unfold IsStepFun in H8;
      elim H8; intros lg H9; unfold is_subdivision in H9;
      elim H9; clear H9; intros lg2 H9; split with (cons a lg);
      unfold is_subdivision; split with (cons (f a) lg2);
      unfold adapted_couple in H9; decompose [and] H9; clear H9;
      unfold adapted_couple; repeat split.
    - unfold ordered_Rlist; intros; simpl in H9;
        induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; rewrite H12; replace (Rmin r1 b) with r1.
        { simpl in H0; rewrite <- H0; apply (H 0%nat); simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
        unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec r1 b) with H7; reflexivity. }
      apply (H10 i); apply Nat.succ_lt_mono.
      replace (S (pred (length lg))) with (length lg).
      { apply H9. }
      symmetry; apply Nat.lt_succ_pred with 0%nat; apply Nat.neq_0_lt_0; intro; rewrite H14 in H9;
        elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H9).
    - simpl; assert (H14 : a <= b).
      { rewrite <- H1; simpl in H0; rewrite <- H0; apply RList_P7;
          [ assumption | left; reflexivity ]. }
      unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H14; reflexivity.
    - assert (H14 : a <= b).
      { rewrite <- H1; simpl in H0; rewrite <- H0; apply RList_P7;
          [ assumption | left; reflexivity ]. }
      replace (Rmax a b) with (Rmax r1 b).
      { rewrite <- H11; induction  lg as [| r0 lg Hreclg].
        { simpl in H13; discriminate. }
        reflexivity. }
      unfold Rmax; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H14; decide (Rle_dec r1 b) with H7;
        reflexivity.
    - simpl; rewrite H13; reflexivity.
    - intros; simpl in H9; induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; simpl; intros;
          assert (H16 : Rmin r1 b = r1).
        { unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec r1 b) with H7; reflexivity. }
        rewrite H16 in H12; rewrite H12 in H14; elim H14; clear H14; intros _ H14;
          unfold g'; case (Rle_dec r1 x); intro r3.
        { elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rle_lt_trans _ _ _ r3 H14)). }
        reflexivity. }
      change
        (constant_D_eq g' (open_interval (pos_Rl lg i) (pos_Rl lg (S i)))
                       (pos_Rl lg2 i)); clear Hreci; assert (H16 := H15 i);
        assert (H17 : (i < pred (length lg))%nat).
      { apply Nat.succ_lt_mono.
        replace (S (pred (length lg))) with (length lg).
        { assumption. }
        symmetry; apply Nat.lt_succ_pred with 0%nat; apply Nat.neq_0_lt_0; red; intro;
          rewrite H14 in H9; elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H9). }
      assert (H18 := H16 H17); unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval in H18;
        unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros;
        assert (H19 := H18 _ H14); rewrite <- H19; unfold g';
        case (Rle_dec r1 x) as [|[]].
      { reflexivity. }
      replace r1 with (Rmin r1 b).
      { rewrite <- H12; elim H14; clear H14; intros H14 _; left;
          apply Rle_lt_trans with (pos_Rl lg i); try assumption.
        apply RList_P5.
        { assumption. }
        elim (RList_P3 lg (pos_Rl lg i)); intros; apply H21; exists i; split.
        { reflexivity. }
        apply Nat.lt_trans with (pred (length lg)); try assumption.
        apply Nat.lt_pred_l; red; intro; rewrite H22 in H17;
          elim (Nat.nlt_0_r _ H17). }
      unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec r1 b) with H7; reflexivity.
  }
  exists (mkStepFun H8); split.
  { simpl; unfold g'; decide (Rle_dec r1 b) with H7; assumption. }
  intros; simpl in H9; induction  i as [| i Hreci].
  { unfold constant_D_eq, co_interval; simpl; intros; simpl in H0;
      rewrite H0; elim H10; clear H10; intros; unfold g';
      case (Rle_dec r1 x); intro r3.
    { elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rle_lt_trans _ _ _ r3 H11)). }
    reflexivity. }
  clear Hreci;
    change
      (constant_D_eq (mkStepFun H8)
                     (co_interval (pos_Rl (cons r1 l) i) (pos_Rl (cons r1 l) (S i)))
                     (f (pos_Rl (cons r1 l) i))); assert (H10 := H6 i);
    assert (H11 : (i < pred (length (cons r1 l)))%nat).
  { simpl; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption. }
  assert (H12 := H10 H11); unfold constant_D_eq, co_interval in H12;
    unfold constant_D_eq, co_interval; intros;
    rewrite <- (H12 _ H13); simpl; unfold g';
    case (Rle_dec r1 x) as [|[]].
  { reflexivity. }
  elim H13; clear H13; intros;
    apply Rle_trans with (pos_Rl (cons r1 l) i); try assumption;
    change (pos_Rl (cons r1 l) 0 <= pos_Rl (cons r1 l) i);
    elim (RList_P6 (cons r1 l)); intros; apply H15;
    [ assumption
    | apply Nat.le_0_l
    | simpl; apply Nat.lt_trans with (length l);
      [ apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption | apply Nat.lt_succ_diag_r ] ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P39 :
  forall (a b:R) (f:StepFun a b),
    RiemannInt_SF f = - RiemannInt_SF (mkStepFun (StepFun_P6 (pre f))).
Proof.
  intros; unfold RiemannInt_SF; case (Rle_dec a b); case (Rle_dec b a);
    intros.
  - assert (H : adapted_couple f a b (subdivision f) (subdivision_val f));
      [ apply StepFun_P1
      | assert
          (H0 :
            adapted_couple (mkStepFun (StepFun_P6 (pre f))) b a
                           (subdivision (mkStepFun (StepFun_P6 (pre f))))
                           (subdivision_val (mkStepFun (StepFun_P6 (pre f)))));
        [ apply StepFun_P1
        | assert (H1 : a = b);
          [ apply Rle_antisym; assumption
          | rewrite (StepFun_P8 H H1); assert (H2 : b = a);
            [ symmetry ; apply H1 | rewrite (StepFun_P8 H0 H2); ring ] ] ] ].
  - rewrite Ropp_involutive; eapply StepFun_P17;
      [ apply StepFun_P1
      | apply StepFun_P2; set (H := StepFun_P6 (pre f)); unfold IsStepFun in H;
        elim H; intros; unfold is_subdivision;
        elim p; intros; apply p0 ].
  - apply Ropp_eq_compat; eapply StepFun_P17;
      [ apply StepFun_P1
      | apply StepFun_P2; set (H := StepFun_P6 (pre f)); unfold IsStepFun in H;
        elim H; intros; unfold is_subdivision;
        elim p; intros; apply p0 ].
  - assert (H : a < b);
      [ auto with real
      | assert (H0 : b < a);
        [ auto with real | elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rlt_trans _ _ _ H H0)) ] ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P40 :
  forall (f:R -> R) (a b c:R) (l1 l2 lf1 lf2:list R),
    a < b ->
    b < c ->
    adapted_couple f a b l1 lf1 ->
    adapted_couple f b c l2 lf2 ->
    adapted_couple f a c (app l1 l2) (FF (app l1 l2) f).
Proof.
  intros f a b c l1 l2 lf1 lf2 H H0 H1 H2; unfold adapted_couple in H1, H2;
    unfold adapted_couple; decompose [and] H1;
    decompose [and] H2; clear H1 H2; repeat split.
  - apply RList_P25; try assumption.
    rewrite H10; rewrite H4; unfold Rmin, Rmax; case (Rle_dec a b) as [|[]];
      case (Rle_dec b c) as [|[]];
      (right; reflexivity) || (left; assumption).
  - rewrite RList_P22.
    { rewrite H5; unfold Rmin, Rmax; case (Rle_dec a c) as [|[]]; case (Rle_dec a b) as [|[]];
        [ reflexivity
        | left; assumption
        | apply Rle_trans with b; left; assumption
        | left; assumption ]. }
    red; intro; rewrite H1 in H6; discriminate.
  - rewrite RList_P24.
    { rewrite H9; unfold Rmin, Rmax; case (Rle_dec a c) as [|[]]; case (Rle_dec b c) as [|[]];
        [ reflexivity
        | left; assumption
        | apply Rle_trans with b; left; assumption
        | left; assumption ]. }
    red; intro; rewrite H1 in H11; discriminate.
  - apply StepFun_P20.
    rewrite app_length; apply Nat.neq_0_lt_0; red; intro.
    assert (List.length l1 = 0)%nat as H12 by now destruct (List.length l1); inversion H1.
    rewrite H12 in H6; discriminate.
  - unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros;
      elim (Nat.le_gt_cases (S (S i)) (length l1)); intro.
    + assert (H14 : pos_Rl (app l1 l2) i = pos_Rl l1 i).
      { apply RList_P26; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; apply Nat.lt_succ_r; apply Nat.succ_le_mono;
          apply Nat.le_trans with (length l1); [ assumption | apply Nat.le_succ_diag_r ]. }
      assert (H15 : pos_Rl (app l1 l2) (S i) = pos_Rl l1 (S i)).
      { apply RList_P26; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; apply Nat.lt_succ_r; assumption. }
      rewrite H14 in H2; rewrite H15 in H2; assert (H16 : (2 <= length l1)%nat).
      { apply Nat.le_trans with (S (S i));
          [ repeat apply -> Nat.succ_le_mono; apply Nat.le_0_l | assumption ]. }
      elim (RList_P20 _ H16); intros r1 [r2 [r3 H17]]; rewrite H17;
        change
          (f x = pos_Rl (map f (mid_Rlist (app (cons r2 r3) l2) r1)) i)
      ; rewrite RList_P12.
      { induction  i as [| i Hreci].
        { simpl; assert (H18 := H8 0%nat);
            unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval in H18;
            assert (H19 : (0 < pred (length l1))%nat).
          { rewrite H17; simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
          assert (H20 := H18 H19); repeat rewrite H20.
          { reflexivity. }
          { assert (H21 : r1 <= r2).
            { rewrite H17 in H3; apply (H3 0%nat).
              simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
            elim H21; intro.
            { split.
              { rewrite H17; simpl; apply Rmult_lt_reg_l with 2;
                  [ prove_sup0
                  | unfold Rdiv; rewrite <- (Rmult_comm (/ 2)); rewrite <- Rmult_assoc;
                    rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym;
                    [ rewrite Rmult_1_l; rewrite double; apply Rplus_lt_compat_l; assumption
                    | discrR ] ]. }
              rewrite H17; simpl; apply Rmult_lt_reg_l with 2;
                [ prove_sup0
                | unfold Rdiv; rewrite <- (Rmult_comm (/ 2)); rewrite <- Rmult_assoc;
                  rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym;
                  [ rewrite Rmult_1_l; rewrite (Rplus_comm r1); rewrite double;
                    apply Rplus_lt_compat_l; assumption
                  | discrR ] ]. }
            elim H2; intros; rewrite H17 in H23; rewrite H17 in H24; simpl in H24;
              simpl in H23; rewrite H22 in H23;
              elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rlt_trans _ _ _ H23 H24)). }
          assumption. }
        clear Hreci; rewrite RList_P13.
        { rewrite H17 in H14; rewrite H17 in H15;
            change
              (pos_Rl (app (cons r2 r3) l2) i =
                 pos_Rl (cons r1 (cons r2 r3)) (S i)) in H14; rewrite H14;
            change
              (pos_Rl (app (cons r2 r3) l2) (S i) =
                 pos_Rl (cons r1 (cons r2 r3)) (S (S i))) in H15;
            rewrite H15; assert (H18 := H8 (S i));
            unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval in H18;
            assert (H19 : (S i < pred (length l1))%nat).
          { apply -> Nat.lt_succ_lt_pred; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; apply Nat.lt_succ_r; assumption. }
          assert (H20 := H18 H19); repeat rewrite H20.
          { reflexivity. }
          { rewrite <- H17; assert (H21 : pos_Rl l1 (S i) <= pos_Rl l1 (S (S i))).
            { apply (H3 (S i)); lia.  }
            elim H21; intro.
            { split.
              { apply Rmult_lt_reg_l with 2;
                  [ prove_sup0
                  | unfold Rdiv; rewrite <- (Rmult_comm (/ 2)); rewrite <- Rmult_assoc;
                    rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym;
                    [ rewrite Rmult_1_l; rewrite double; apply Rplus_lt_compat_l; assumption
                    | discrR ] ]. }
              apply Rmult_lt_reg_l with 2;
                [ prove_sup0
                | unfold Rdiv; rewrite <- (Rmult_comm (/ 2)); rewrite <- Rmult_assoc;
                  rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym;
                  [ rewrite Rmult_1_l; rewrite (Rplus_comm (pos_Rl l1 (S i)));
                    rewrite double; apply Rplus_lt_compat_l; assumption
                  | discrR ] ]. }
            elim H2; intros; rewrite H22 in H23;
              elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rlt_trans _ _ _ H23 H24)). }
          assumption. }
        simpl; rewrite H17 in H1; simpl in H1; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption. }
      rewrite RList_P14; rewrite H17 in H1; simpl in H1; apply H1.
    + inversion H12.
      { assert (H16 : pos_Rl (app l1 l2) (S i) = b).
        { rewrite RList_P29.
          { rewrite H15; rewrite Nat.sub_diag; rewrite H10; unfold Rmin;
              case (Rle_dec b c) as [|[]]; [ reflexivity | left; assumption ]. }
          { rewrite H15; apply le_n. }
          induction  l1 as [| r l1 Hrecl1].
          { simpl in H15; discriminate. }
          clear Hrecl1; simpl in H1; simpl; apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption. }
        assert (H17 : pos_Rl (app l1 l2) i = b).
        { rewrite RList_P26.
          { replace i with (pred (length l1));
              [ rewrite H4; unfold Rmax; case (Rle_dec a b) as [|[]];
                [ reflexivity | left; assumption ]
              | rewrite H15; reflexivity ]. }
          rewrite H15; apply Nat.lt_succ_diag_r. }
        rewrite H16 in H2; rewrite H17 in H2; elim H2; intros;
          elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rlt_trans _ _ _ H14 H18)). }
      assert (H16 : pos_Rl (app l1 l2) i = pos_Rl l2 (i - length l1)).
      { apply RList_P29.
        { apply Nat.succ_le_mono; assumption. }
        apply Nat.lt_le_trans with (pred (length (app l1 l2)));
          [ assumption | apply Nat.le_pred_l ]. }
      assert
        (H17 : pos_Rl (app l1 l2) (S i) = pos_Rl l2 (S (i - length l1))).
      { replace (S (i - length l1)) with (S i - length l1)%nat.
        { apply RList_P29.
          { apply le_S_n; apply Nat.le_trans with (S i); [ assumption | apply Nat.le_succ_diag_r ]. }
          induction  l1 as [| r l1 Hrecl1].
          { simpl in H6; discriminate. }
          clear Hrecl1; simpl in H1; simpl; apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption. }
        apply Nat.sub_succ_l, Nat.succ_le_mono; assumption. }
      assert (H18 : (2 <= length l1)%nat).
      { clear f c l2 lf2 H0 H3 H8 H7 H10 H9 H11 H13 i H1 x H2 H12 m H14 H15 H16 H17;
          induction  l1 as [| r l1 Hrecl1].
        { discriminate. }
        clear Hrecl1; induction  l1 as [| r0 l1 Hrecl1].
        { simpl in H5; simpl in H4; assert (H0 : Rmin a b < Rmax a b).
          { unfold Rmin, Rmax; case (Rle_dec a b) as [|[]];
              [ assumption | left; assumption ]. }
          rewrite <- H5 in H0; rewrite <- H4 in H0; elim (Rlt_irrefl _ H0). }
        clear Hrecl1; simpl; repeat apply -> Nat.succ_le_mono; apply Nat.le_0_l. }
      elim (RList_P20 _ H18); intros r1 [r2 [r3 H19]]; rewrite H19;
        change
          (f x = pos_Rl (map f (mid_Rlist (app (cons r2 r3) l2) r1)) i)
      ; rewrite RList_P12.
      2:{ rewrite RList_P14; rewrite H19 in H1; simpl in H1; simpl; apply H1. }
      induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { assert (H20 := le_S_n _ _ H15); assert (H21 := Nat.le_trans _ _ _ H18 H20);
          elim (Nat.nle_succ_0 _ H21). }
      clear Hreci; rewrite RList_P13.
      2:{ simpl; rewrite H19 in H1; simpl in H1; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption. }
      rewrite H19 in H16; rewrite H19 in H17;
        change
          (pos_Rl (app (cons r2 r3) l2) i =
             pos_Rl l2 (S i - length (cons r1 (cons r2 r3))))
        in H16; rewrite H16;
        change
          (pos_Rl (app (cons r2 r3) l2) (S i) =
             pos_Rl l2 (S (S i - length (cons r1 (cons r2 r3)))))
        in H17; rewrite H17; assert (H20 := H13 (S i - length l1)%nat);
        unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval in H20;
        assert (H21 : (S i - length l1 < pred (length l2))%nat).
      { apply Nat.lt_succ_lt_pred; rewrite <- Nat.sub_succ_l.
        { apply Nat.add_lt_mono_l with (length l1); rewrite Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add.
          { rewrite H19 in H1; simpl in H1; rewrite H19; simpl;
              rewrite app_length in H1; apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption. }
          apply Nat.le_trans with (S i); [ apply Nat.succ_le_mono; assumption | apply Nat.le_succ_diag_r ]. }
        apply Nat.succ_le_mono; assumption. }
      assert (H22 := H20 H21); repeat rewrite H22.
      { reflexivity. }
      { rewrite <- H19;
          assert
            (H23 : pos_Rl l2 (S i - length l1) <= pos_Rl l2 (S (S i - length l1))).
        { apply H7; apply Nat.lt_succ_lt_pred.
          rewrite <- Nat.sub_succ_l.
          { apply Nat.add_lt_mono_l with (length l1); rewrite Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add.
            { rewrite H19 in H1; simpl in H1; rewrite H19; simpl;
                rewrite app_length in H1; apply -> Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption. }
            apply Nat.le_trans with (S i); [ apply Nat.succ_le_mono; assumption | apply Nat.le_succ_diag_r ]. }
          apply Nat.succ_le_mono; assumption. }
        elim H23; intro.
        { split.
          { apply Rmult_lt_reg_l with 2;
              [ prove_sup0
              | unfold Rdiv; rewrite <- (Rmult_comm (/ 2)); rewrite <- Rmult_assoc;
                rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym;
                [ rewrite Rmult_1_l; rewrite double; apply Rplus_lt_compat_l; assumption
                | discrR ] ]. }
          apply Rmult_lt_reg_l with 2;
            [ prove_sup0
            | unfold Rdiv; rewrite <- (Rmult_comm (/ 2)); rewrite <- Rmult_assoc;
              rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym;
              [ rewrite Rmult_1_l; rewrite (Rplus_comm (pos_Rl l2 (S i - length l1)));
                rewrite double; apply Rplus_lt_compat_l; assumption
              | discrR ] ]. }
        rewrite <- H19 in H16; rewrite <- H19 in H17; elim H2; intros;
          rewrite H19 in H25; rewrite H19 in H26; simpl in H25;
          simpl in H16; rewrite H16 in H25; simpl in H26; simpl in H17;
          rewrite H17 in H26; simpl in H24; rewrite H24 in H25;
          elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rlt_trans _ _ _ H25 H26)). }
      assert (H23 : pos_Rl (app l1 l2) (S i) = pos_Rl l2 (S i - length l1)).
      { rewrite H19; simpl; simpl in H16; apply H16. }
      assert
        (H24 :
          pos_Rl (app l1 l2) (S (S i)) = pos_Rl l2 (S (S i - length l1))).
      { rewrite H19; simpl; simpl in H17; apply H17. }
      rewrite <- H23; rewrite <- H24; assumption.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P41 :
  forall (f:R -> R) (a b c:R),
    a <= b -> b <= c -> IsStepFun f a b -> IsStepFun f b c -> IsStepFun f a c.
Proof.
  intros f a b c H H0 (l1,(lf1,H1)) (l2,(lf2,H2));
    destruct (total_order_T a b) as [[Hltab|Hab]|Hgtab].
  - destruct (total_order_T b c) as [[Hltbc|Hbc]|Hgtbc].
    + exists (app l1 l2); exists (FF (app l1 l2) f);
        apply StepFun_P40 with b lf1 lf2; assumption.
    + exists l1; exists lf1; rewrite Hbc in H1; assumption.
    + elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rle_lt_trans _ _ _ H0 Hgtbc)).
  - exists l2; exists lf2; rewrite <- Hab in H2; assumption.
  - elim (Rlt_irrefl _ (Rle_lt_trans _ _ _ H Hgtab)).
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P42 :
  forall (l1 l2:list R) (f:R -> R),
    pos_Rl l1 (pred (length l1)) = pos_Rl l2 0 ->
    Int_SF (FF (app l1 l2) f) (app l1 l2) =
    Int_SF (FF l1 f) l1 + Int_SF (FF l2 f) l2.
Proof.
  intros l1 l2 f; induction l1 as [| r l1 IHl1]; intros H;
    [ simpl; ring
      | destruct l1 as [| r0 r1];
        [ simpl in H; simpl; destruct l2 as [| r0 r1];
          [ simpl; ring | simpl; simpl in H; rewrite H; ring ]
          | simpl; rewrite Rplus_assoc; apply Rplus_eq_compat_l; apply IHl1;
            rewrite <- H; reflexivity ] ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P43 :
  forall (f:R -> R) (a b c:R) (pr1:IsStepFun f a b)
    (pr2:IsStepFun f b c) (pr3:IsStepFun f a c),
    RiemannInt_SF (mkStepFun pr1) + RiemannInt_SF (mkStepFun pr2) =
      RiemannInt_SF (mkStepFun pr3).
Proof.
  intros f; intros.
  pose proof pr1 as (l1,(lf1,H1)).
  pose proof pr2 as (l2,(lf2,H2)).
  pose proof pr3 as (l3,(lf3,H3)).
  replace (RiemannInt_SF (mkStepFun pr1)) with
    match Rle_dec a b with
    | left _ => Int_SF lf1 l1
    | right _ => - Int_SF lf1 l1
    end.
  1:replace (RiemannInt_SF (mkStepFun pr2)) with
    match Rle_dec b c with
    | left _ => Int_SF lf2 l2
    | right _ => - Int_SF lf2 l2
    end.
  1:replace (RiemannInt_SF (mkStepFun pr3)) with
    match Rle_dec a c with
    | left _ => Int_SF lf3 l3
    | right _ => - Int_SF lf3 l3
    end.
  2,3,4:unfold RiemannInt_SF; case (Rle_dec _ _); intro;[|apply Ropp_eq_compat];
    (eapply StepFun_P17;[|apply StepFun_P1]);assumption.
  case (Rle_dec a b) as [Hle|Hnle]; case (Rle_dec b c) as [Hle'|Hnle']; case (Rle_dec a c) as [Hle''|Hnle''].
  - elim Hle; intro.
    1:elim Hle'; intro.
    + replace (Int_SF lf3 l3) with
        (Int_SF (FF (app l1 l2) f) (app l1 l2)).
      2:{ eapply StepFun_P17; [ apply (StepFun_P40 H H0 H1 H2) | apply H3 ]. }
      replace (Int_SF lf1 l1) with (Int_SF (FF l1 f) l1).
      { replace (Int_SF lf2 l2) with (Int_SF (FF l2 f) l2).
        { symmetry ; apply StepFun_P42.
          unfold adapted_couple in H1, H2; decompose [and] H1; decompose [and] H2;
            clear H1 H2; rewrite H11; rewrite H5; unfold Rmax, Rmin;
            decide (Rle_dec a b) with Hle; decide (Rle_dec b c) with Hle'; reflexivity. }
        eapply StepFun_P17;
          [ apply StepFun_P21; unfold is_subdivision; split with lf2; apply H2;
            assumption
          | assumption ]. }
      eapply StepFun_P17;
        [ apply StepFun_P21; unfold is_subdivision; split with lf1; apply H1
        | assumption ].
    + replace (Int_SF lf2 l2) with 0.
      { rewrite Rplus_0_r; eapply StepFun_P17;
          [ apply H1 | rewrite <- H0 in H3; apply H3 ]. }
      symmetry ; eapply StepFun_P8; [ apply H2 | assumption ].
    + replace (Int_SF lf1 l1) with 0.
      { rewrite Rplus_0_l; eapply StepFun_P17;
          [ apply H2 | rewrite H in H3; apply H3 ]. }
      symmetry ; eapply StepFun_P8; [ apply H1 | assumption ].
  - elim Hnle''; apply Rle_trans with b; assumption.
  - apply Rplus_eq_reg_l with (Int_SF lf2 l2);
      replace (Int_SF lf2 l2 + (Int_SF lf1 l1 + - Int_SF lf2 l2)) with
      (Int_SF lf1 l1); [ idtac | ring ].
    assert (H : c < b).
    { auto with real. }
    elim Hle''; intro.
    { rewrite Rplus_comm;
        replace (Int_SF lf1 l1) with
        (Int_SF (FF (app l3 l2) f) (app l3 l2)).
      { replace (Int_SF lf3 l3) with (Int_SF (FF l3 f) l3).
        { replace (Int_SF lf2 l2) with (Int_SF (FF l2 f) l2).
          { apply StepFun_P42.
            unfold adapted_couple in H2, H3; decompose [and] H2; decompose [and] H3;
              clear H3 H2; rewrite H10; rewrite H6; unfold Rmax, Rmin.
            decide (Rle_dec a c) with Hle''; decide (Rle_dec b c) with Hnle';
              reflexivity. }
          eapply StepFun_P17;
            [ apply StepFun_P21; unfold is_subdivision; split with lf2; apply H2
            | assumption ]. }
        eapply StepFun_P17;
          [ apply StepFun_P21; unfold is_subdivision; split with lf3; apply H3
          | assumption ]. }
      eapply StepFun_P17;
        [ apply (StepFun_P40 H0 H H3 (StepFun_P2 H2)) | apply H1 ]. }
    replace (Int_SF lf3 l3) with 0.
    { rewrite Rplus_0_r; eapply StepFun_P17;
        [ apply H1 | apply StepFun_P2; rewrite <- H0 in H2; apply H2 ]. }
    symmetry ; eapply StepFun_P8; [ apply H3 | assumption ].
  - replace (Int_SF lf2 l2) with (Int_SF lf3 l3 + Int_SF lf1 l1).
    { ring. }
    elim Hle; intro.
    { replace (Int_SF lf2 l2) with
        (Int_SF (FF (app l3 l1) f) (app l3 l1)).
      { replace (Int_SF lf3 l3) with (Int_SF (FF l3 f) l3).
        { replace (Int_SF lf1 l1) with (Int_SF (FF l1 f) l1).
          { symmetry ; apply StepFun_P42.
            unfold adapted_couple in H1, H3; decompose [and] H1; decompose [and] H3;
              clear H3 H1; rewrite H9; rewrite H5; unfold Rmax, Rmin;
              decide (Rle_dec a c) with Hnle''; decide (Rle_dec a b) with Hle; reflexivity. }
          eapply StepFun_P17;
            [ apply StepFun_P21; unfold is_subdivision; split with lf1; apply H1
            | assumption ]. }
        eapply StepFun_P17;
          [ apply StepFun_P21; unfold is_subdivision; split with lf3; apply H3
          | assumption ]. }
      eapply StepFun_P17.
      { assert (H0 : c < a).
        { auto with real. }
        apply (StepFun_P40 H0 H (StepFun_P2 H3) H1). }
      apply StepFun_P2; apply H2. }
    replace (Int_SF lf1 l1) with 0.
    { rewrite Rplus_0_r; eapply StepFun_P17;
        [ apply H3 | rewrite <- H in H2; apply H2 ]. }
    symmetry ; eapply StepFun_P8; [ apply H1 | assumption ].
  - assert (H : b < a).
    { auto with real. }
    replace (Int_SF lf2 l2) with (Int_SF lf3 l3 + Int_SF lf1 l1).
    { ring. }
    rewrite Rplus_comm; elim Hle''; intro.
    { replace (Int_SF lf2 l2) with
        (Int_SF (FF (app l1 l3) f) (app l1 l3)).
      { replace (Int_SF lf3 l3) with (Int_SF (FF l3 f) l3).
        { replace (Int_SF lf1 l1) with (Int_SF (FF l1 f) l1).
          { symmetry ; apply StepFun_P42.
            unfold adapted_couple in H1, H3; decompose [and] H1; decompose [and] H3;
              clear H3 H1; rewrite H11; rewrite H5; unfold Rmax, Rmin;
              decide (Rle_dec a c) with Hle''; decide (Rle_dec a b) with Hnle;
              reflexivity. }
          eapply StepFun_P17;
            [ apply StepFun_P21; unfold is_subdivision; split with lf1; apply H1
            | assumption ]. }
        eapply StepFun_P17;
          [ apply StepFun_P21; unfold is_subdivision; split with lf3; apply H3
          | assumption ]. }
      eapply StepFun_P17.
      { apply (StepFun_P40 H H0 (StepFun_P2 H1) H3). }
      apply H2. }
    replace (Int_SF lf3 l3) with 0.
    { rewrite Rplus_0_r; eapply StepFun_P17;
        [ apply H1 | rewrite <- H0 in H2; apply StepFun_P2; apply H2 ]. }
    symmetry ; eapply StepFun_P8; [ apply H3 | assumption ].
  - assert (H : c < a).
    { auto with real. }
    replace (Int_SF lf1 l1) with (Int_SF lf2 l2 + Int_SF lf3 l3).
    { ring. }
    elim Hle'; intro.
    { replace (Int_SF lf1 l1) with
        (Int_SF (FF (app l2 l3) f) (app l2 l3)).
      { replace (Int_SF lf3 l3) with (Int_SF (FF l3 f) l3).
        { replace (Int_SF lf2 l2) with (Int_SF (FF l2 f) l2).
          { symmetry ; apply StepFun_P42.
            unfold adapted_couple in H2, H3; decompose [and] H2; decompose [and] H3;
              clear H3 H2; rewrite H11; rewrite H5; unfold Rmax, Rmin;
              decide (Rle_dec a c) with Hnle''; decide (Rle_dec b c) with Hle';
              reflexivity. }
          eapply StepFun_P17;
            [ apply StepFun_P21; unfold is_subdivision; split with lf2; apply H2
            | assumption ]. }
        eapply StepFun_P17;
          [ apply StepFun_P21; unfold is_subdivision; split with lf3; apply H3
          | assumption ]. }
      eapply StepFun_P17.
      { apply (StepFun_P40 H0 H H2 (StepFun_P2 H3)). }
      apply StepFun_P2; apply H1. }
    replace (Int_SF lf2 l2) with 0.
    { rewrite Rplus_0_l; eapply StepFun_P17;
        [ apply H3 | rewrite H0 in H1; apply H1 ]. }
    symmetry; eapply StepFun_P8; [ apply H2 | assumption ].
  - elim Hnle'; apply Rle_trans with a; try assumption.
    auto with real.
  - assert (H : c < b).
    { auto with real. }
    assert (H0 : b < a).
    { auto with real. }
    replace (Int_SF lf3 l3) with (Int_SF lf2 l2 + Int_SF lf1 l1).
    { ring. }
    replace (Int_SF lf3 l3) with
      (Int_SF (FF (app l2 l1) f) (app l2 l1)).
    { replace (Int_SF lf1 l1) with (Int_SF (FF l1 f) l1).
      { replace (Int_SF lf2 l2) with (Int_SF (FF l2 f) l2).
        { symmetry ; apply StepFun_P42.
          unfold adapted_couple in H2, H1; decompose [and] H2; decompose [and] H1;
            clear H1 H2; rewrite H11; rewrite H5; unfold Rmax, Rmin;
            decide (Rle_dec a b) with Hnle; decide (Rle_dec b c) with Hnle';
            reflexivity. }
        eapply StepFun_P17;
          [ apply StepFun_P21; unfold is_subdivision; split with lf2; apply H2
          | assumption ]. }
      eapply StepFun_P17;
        [ apply StepFun_P21; unfold is_subdivision; split with lf1; apply H1
        | assumption ]. }
    eapply StepFun_P17.
    { apply (StepFun_P40 H H0 (StepFun_P2 H2) (StepFun_P2 H1)). }
    apply StepFun_P2; apply H3.
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P44 :
  forall (f:R -> R) (a b c:R),
    IsStepFun f a b -> a <= c <= b -> IsStepFun f a c.
Proof.
  intros f; intros; assert (H0 : a <= b).
  { elim H; intros; apply Rle_trans with c; assumption. }
  elim H; clear H; intros; unfold IsStepFun in X; unfold is_subdivision in X;
    elim X; clear X; intros l1 [lf1 H2];
    cut
      (forall (l1 lf1:list R) (a b c:R) (f:R -> R),
          adapted_couple f a b l1 lf1 ->
          a <= c <= b ->
          { l:list R & { l0:list R & adapted_couple f a c l l0 } }).
  { intro X; unfold IsStepFun; unfold is_subdivision; eapply X.
    { apply H2. }
    split; assumption. }
  clear f a b c H0 H H1 H2 l1 lf1; simple induction l1.
  { intros; unfold adapted_couple in H; decompose [and] H; clear H; simpl in H4;
      discriminate. }
  intros r r0; elim r0.
  { intros X lf1 a b c f H H0; assert (H1 : a = b).
    { unfold adapted_couple in H; decompose [and] H; clear H; simpl in H3;
        simpl in H2; assert (H7 : a <= b).
      { elim H0; intros; apply Rle_trans with c; assumption. }
      replace a with (Rmin a b).
      { pattern b at 2; replace b with (Rmax a b).
        { rewrite <- H2; rewrite H3; reflexivity. }
        unfold Rmax; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H7; reflexivity. }
      unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H7; reflexivity. }
    split with (cons r nil); split with lf1; assert (H2 : c = b).
    { rewrite H1 in H0; elim H0; intros; apply Rle_antisym; assumption. }
    rewrite H2; assumption. }
  intros r1 r2 _ X0 lf1 a b c f H H0; induction  lf1 as [| r3 lf1 Hreclf1].
  { unfold adapted_couple in H; decompose [and] H; clear H; simpl in H4;
      discriminate. }
  clear Hreclf1; assert (H1 : {c <= r1} + {r1 < c}).
  { case (Rle_dec c r1); intro; [ left; assumption | right; auto with real ]. }
  elim H1; intro a0.
  { split with (cons r (cons c nil)); split with (cons r3 nil);
      unfold adapted_couple in H; decompose [and] H; clear H;
      assert (H6 : r = a).
    { simpl in H4; rewrite H4; unfold Rmin; case (Rle_dec a b) as [|[]];
        [ reflexivity
        | elim H0; intros; apply Rle_trans with c; assumption ]. }
    elim H0; clear H0; intros; unfold adapted_couple; repeat split.
    { rewrite H6; unfold ordered_Rlist; intros; simpl in H8; inversion H8;
        [ simpl; assumption | elim (Nat.nle_succ_0 _ H10) ]. }
    { simpl; unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec a c) with H; assumption. }
    { simpl; unfold Rmax; decide (Rle_dec a c) with H; reflexivity. }
    unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros; simpl in H8;
      inversion H8.
    { simpl; assert (H10 := H7 0%nat);
        assert (H12 : (0 < pred (length (cons r (cons r1 r2))))%nat).
      { simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
      apply (H10 H12); unfold open_interval; simpl;
        rewrite H11 in H9; simpl in H9; elim H9; clear H9;
        intros; split; try assumption.
      apply Rlt_le_trans with c; assumption. }
    elim (Nat.nle_succ_0 _ H11). }
  cut (adapted_couple f r1 b (cons r1 r2) lf1).
  { cut (r1 <= c <= b).
    { intros.
      elim (X0 _ _ _ _ _ H3 H2); intros l1' [lf1' H4]; split with (cons r l1');
        split with (cons r3 lf1'); unfold adapted_couple in H, H4;
        decompose [and] H; decompose [and] H4; clear H H4 X0;
        assert (H14 : a <= b).
      { elim H0; intros; apply Rle_trans with c; assumption. }
      assert (H16 : r = a).
      { simpl in H7; rewrite H7; unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H14;
          reflexivity. }
      induction  l1' as [| r4 l1' Hrecl1'].
      { simpl in H13; discriminate. }
      clear Hrecl1'; unfold adapted_couple; repeat split.
      { unfold ordered_Rlist; intros; simpl in H; induction  i as [| i Hreci].
        { simpl; replace r4 with r1.
          { apply (H5 0%nat).
            simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
          simpl in H12; rewrite H12; unfold Rmin; case (Rle_dec r1 c) as [|[]];
            [ reflexivity | left; assumption ]. }
        apply (H9 i); simpl; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption. }
      { simpl; unfold Rmin; case (Rle_dec a c) as [|[]];
          [ assumption | elim H0; intros; assumption ]. }
      { replace (Rmax a c) with (Rmax r1 c).
        { rewrite <- H11; reflexivity. }
        unfold Rmax; case (Rle_dec a c) as [|[]]; case (Rle_dec r1 c) as [|[]];
          [ reflexivity
          | left; assumption
          | elim H0; intros; assumption
          | left; assumption ]. }
      { simpl; simpl in H13; rewrite H13; reflexivity. }
      intros; simpl in H; unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros;
        induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; assert (H17 := H10 0%nat);
          assert (H18 : (0 < pred (length (cons r (cons r1 r2))))%nat).
        { simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
        apply (H17 H18); unfold open_interval; simpl; simpl in H4;
          elim H4; clear H4; intros; split; try assumption;
          replace r1 with r4.
        { assumption. }
        simpl in H12; rewrite H12; unfold Rmin; case (Rle_dec r1 c) as [|[]];
          [ reflexivity | left; assumption ]. }
      clear Hreci; simpl; apply H15.
      { simpl; apply Nat.succ_lt_mono; assumption. }
      unfold open_interval; apply H4. }
    split.
    { left; assumption. }
    elim H0; intros; assumption. }
  eapply StepFun_P7;
    [ elim H0; intros; apply Rle_trans with c; [ apply H2 | apply H3 ]
    | apply H ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P45 :
  forall (f:R -> R) (a b c:R),
    IsStepFun f a b -> a <= c <= b -> IsStepFun f c b.
Proof.
  intros f; intros; assert (H0 : a <= b).
  { elim H; intros; apply Rle_trans with c; assumption. }
  elim H; clear H; intros; unfold IsStepFun in X; unfold is_subdivision in X;
    elim X; clear X; intros l1 [lf1 H2];
    cut
      (forall (l1 lf1:list R) (a b c:R) (f:R -> R),
          adapted_couple f a b l1 lf1 ->
          a <= c <= b ->
          { l:list R & { l0:list R & adapted_couple f c b l l0 } }).
  { intro X; unfold IsStepFun; unfold is_subdivision; eapply X;
      [ apply H2 | split; assumption ]. }
  clear f a b c H0 H H1 H2 l1 lf1; simple induction l1.
  { intros; unfold adapted_couple in H; decompose [and] H; clear H; simpl in H4;
      discriminate. }
  intros r r0; elim r0.
  { intros X lf1 a b c f H H0; assert (H1 : a = b).
    { unfold adapted_couple in H; decompose [and] H; clear H; simpl in H3;
        simpl in H2; assert (H7 : a <= b).
      { elim H0; intros; apply Rle_trans with c; assumption. }
      replace a with (Rmin a b).
      { pattern b at 2; replace b with (Rmax a b).
        { rewrite <- H2; rewrite H3; reflexivity. }
        unfold Rmax; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H7; reflexivity. }
      unfold Rmin; decide (Rle_dec a b) with H7; reflexivity. }
    split with (cons r nil); split with lf1; assert (H2 : c = b).
    { rewrite H1 in H0; elim H0; intros; apply Rle_antisym; assumption. }
    rewrite <- H2 in H1; rewrite <- H1; assumption. }
  intros r1 r2 _ X0 lf1 a b c f H H0; induction  lf1 as [| r3 lf1 Hreclf1].
  { unfold adapted_couple in H; decompose [and] H; clear H; simpl in H4;
      discriminate. }
  clear Hreclf1; assert (H1 : {c <= r1} + {r1 < c}).
  { case (Rle_dec c r1); intro; [ left; assumption | right; auto with real ]. }
  elim H1; intro a0.
  { split with (cons c (cons r1 r2)); split with (cons r3 lf1);
      unfold adapted_couple in H; decompose [and] H; clear H;
      unfold adapted_couple; repeat split.
    - unfold ordered_Rlist; intros; simpl in H; induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { simpl; assumption. }
      clear Hreci; apply (H2 (S i)); simpl; assumption.
    - simpl; unfold Rmin; case (Rle_dec c b) as [|[]];
        [ reflexivity | elim H0; intros; assumption ].
    - replace (Rmax c b) with (Rmax a b).
      { rewrite <- H3; reflexivity. }
      unfold Rmax; case (Rle_dec c b) as [|[]]; case (Rle_dec a b) as [|[]];
        [ reflexivity
        | elim H0; intros; apply Rle_trans with c; assumption
        | elim H0; intros; assumption
        | elim H0; intros; apply Rle_trans with c; assumption ].
    - simpl; simpl in H5; apply H5.
    - intros; simpl in H; induction  i as [| i Hreci].
      { unfold constant_D_eq, open_interval; intros; simpl;
          apply (H7 0%nat).
        { simpl; apply Nat.lt_0_succ. }
        unfold open_interval; simpl; simpl in H6; elim H6; clear H6;
          intros; split; try assumption; apply Rle_lt_trans with c;
          try assumption; replace r with a.
        { elim H0; intros; assumption. }
        simpl in H4; rewrite H4; unfold Rmin; case (Rle_dec a b) as [|[]];
          [ reflexivity
          | elim H0; intros; apply Rle_trans with c; assumption ]. }
      clear Hreci; apply (H7 (S i)); simpl; assumption. }
  cut (adapted_couple f r1 b (cons r1 r2) lf1).
  { cut (r1 <= c <= b).
    { intros; elim (X0 _ _ _ _ _ H3 H2); intros l1' [lf1' H4]; split with l1';
        split with lf1'; assumption. }
    split; [ left; assumption | elim H0; intros; assumption ]. }
  eapply StepFun_P7;
    [ elim H0; intros; apply Rle_trans with c; [ apply H2 | apply H3 ]
    | apply H ].
Qed.

Lemma StepFun_P46 :
  forall (f:R -> R) (a b c:R),
    IsStepFun f a b -> IsStepFun f b c -> IsStepFun f a c.
Proof.
  intros f; intros; case (Rle_dec a b); case (Rle_dec b c); intros.
  - apply StepFun_P41 with b; assumption.
  - case (Rle_dec a c); intro.
    + apply StepFun_P44 with b; try assumption.
      split; [ assumption | auto with real ].
    + apply StepFun_P6; apply StepFun_P44 with b.
      * apply StepFun_P6; assumption.
      * split; auto with real.
  - case (Rle_dec a c); intro.
    + apply StepFun_P45 with b; try assumption.
      split; auto with real.
    + apply StepFun_P6; apply StepFun_P45 with b.
      * apply StepFun_P6; assumption.
      * split; [ assumption | auto with real ].
  - apply StepFun_P6; apply StepFun_P41 with b;
      auto with real || apply StepFun_P6; assumption.
Qed.
