From: quinlan@pathname.com  Mon Sep  2 12:32:26 2002
Return-Path: <quinlan@pathname.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9001A43F99
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 07:32:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 02 Sep 2002 12:32:24 +0100 (IST)
Received: from proton.pathname.com
    (adsl-216-103-211-240.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.103.211.240]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7V0KkZ16711 for
    <jm@jmason.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 01:20:47 +0100
Received: from quinlan by proton.pathname.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1
    (Debian)) id 17kw0Z-0001k9-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 17:20:59 -0700
To: yyyy@example.com (Justin Mason)
Cc: SpamAssassin-devel@sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [SAdev] GA-assigned SPAM_PHRASE_55_XX score
References: <20020830103221.9148E43F99@phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com>
From: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@pathname.com>
Date: 30 Aug 2002 17:20:59 -0700
In-Reply-To: yyyy@example.com's message of "Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:32:16 +0100"
Message-Id: <yf2n0r3ho9g.fsf@proton.pathname.com>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=7.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_GNUS_XM
	version=2.40-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

jm@jmason.org (Justin Mason) writes:

> BTW I tried tweaking some of the scores that lint-rules complained about
> being negative when they shouldn't be, and it *ruined* the results.  it's
> worth hand-tweaking a bit, but in some cases, there's counter-intuitive
> combinatorial effects like the above, so be careful when tweaking; run
> a "./logs-to-c && ./evolve -C" to check the new hitrates afterwards.

My tendency is to say that we shouldn't tweak at all.

- Dan

