From: exmh-users-admin@redhat.com  Wed Sep 11 13:42:15 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-users-admin@example.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1996C16F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:42:15 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:42:15 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8AKN8C15441 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:23:12 +0100
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FE7410FC; Tue, 10 Sep 2002
    16:22:25 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-users@listman.example.com
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990B440CC2
    for <exmh-users@listman.redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:16:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g8AJGKj31072 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Tue, 10 Sep 2002
    15:16:20 -0400
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8AJGKk31068 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:16:20 -0400
Received: from shelob.ce.ttu.edu (IDENT:root@shelob.ce.ttu.edu
    [129.118.20.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id
    g8AIxww24664 for <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 14:59:58 -0400
Received: from shelob.ce.ttu.edu (IDENT:thompson@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    shelob.ce.ttu.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8AJGJd17943 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 14:16:19 -0500
Message-Id: <200209101916.g8AJGJd17943@shelob.ce.ttu.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: exmh-users@example.com
Subject: Re: Sorting
In-Reply-To: Your message of
    "Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:27:12 PDT."
    <1528.1031675232@kanga.nu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: "David B. Thompson" <thompson@shelob.ce.ttu.edu>
X-Loop: exmh-users@example.com
Sender: exmh-users-admin@example.com
Errors-To: exmh-users-admin@example.com
X-Beenthere: exmh-users@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: exmh-users@example.com
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-users-request@example.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-users@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
    <mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users <exmh-users.example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
    <mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-users/>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 14:16:19 -0500
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.8 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,X_LOOP
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

> > You're probably running exmh on a local machine.  I'm running it on a
> > very remote machine.  In this scenario, the mime handling is weak.
> 
> Nope.  I run exmh on my desktops at home and at work with the resulting
> exmh windows being displayed on both my work and home desktops (gratis
> SSH X11 forwarding).

I run exmh routinely from home (broadband) using an XWindows Client tunneled through ssh under <ahem> WinXP.  It works very well in this fashion.

FWIW, I use Eudora under Winder$ because it's less of a virus magnet.  :)

There's more to the story why I run Winder$, but that's really off-topic and I'm already guilty!

-=d



_______________________________________________
Exmh-users mailing list
Exmh-users@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users


