From: exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com  Wed Sep 11 21:29:14 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-workers-admin@example.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EE616F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:29:13 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:29:13 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BJrYC29444 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:53:34 +0100
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E4C3F8E1; Wed, 11 Sep 2002
    15:53:46 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.example.com
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27CD3F1F9
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:49:29 -0400
    (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g8BJnOp25735 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 11 Sep 2002
    15:49:24 -0400
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8BJnOk25731 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:49:24 -0400
Received: from mail2.lsil.com (mail2.lsil.com [147.145.40.22]) by
    mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8BJWsw31928 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:32:54 -0400
Received: from mhbs.lsil.com (mhbs [147.145.31.100]) by mail2.lsil.com
    (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA12062 for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>;
    Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: kchrist@lsil.com
Received: from inca.co.lsil.com by mhbs.lsil.com with ESMTP;
    Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:48:53 -0700
Received: from flytrap.co.lsil.com (flytrap.co.lsil.com [172.20.3.234]) by
    inca.co.lsil.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA16659; Wed, 11 Sep 2002
    13:48:52 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from bhuta.co.lsil.com (bhuta [172.20.12.135]) by
    flytrap.co.lsil.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA20468;
    Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:48:50 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from bhuta (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bhuta.co.lsil.com
    (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id g8BJmed21224; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:48:40
    -0600 (MDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/09/2001 with nmh-1.0.4+dev
To: Hacksaw <hacksaw@hacksaw.org>
Cc: exmh-workers@example.com
Subject: Re: exmh bug?
Reply-To: Kevin.Christian@lsil.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of
    "Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:17:33 PDT."
    <200209111917.PAA02912@blackcomb.panasas.com>
References: <200209111917.PAA02912@blackcomb.panasas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <21222.1031773720@bhuta>
X-Loop: exmh-workers@example.com
Sender: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-workers-request@example.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-workers@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers <exmh-workers.example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-workers/>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:48:40 -0600
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.0 required=7.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      NO_REAL_NAME,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL,X_LOOP
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 


The way to debug something like this is to turn on the log (Preferences 
-> Hacking Support -> Debug log enabled) and track the gpg commands 
being issued and the responses.

FWIW, using exmh 2.5 and gpg 1.0.7 I do not have problems sending 
encrypted messages to myself. When I select the message, an xterm 
window pops up asking for the passphrase. I don't recall exmh ever 
asking me for the passphrase from the tty that started exmh nor from a 
dialog box. (But then again, I'm not a heavy gpg user).

Kevin

In message <200209111917.PAA02912@blackcomb.panasas.com>, Brent Welch writes:
> Hmm - I'm cc'ing the exmh-workers list, because I really don't know
> much about the various PGP interfaces.  I think there has been some
> talk about "issues" with the latest version of gpg.
> 
> >>>Hacksaw said:
>  > version 2.5 08/15/2002
>  > Linux habitrail.home.fools-errant.com 2.4.7-10smp #1 SMP Thu Sep 6 17:09:31
>  > EDT 2001 i686 unknown
>  > Tk 8.3 Tcl 8.3
>  > 
>  > It's not clear to me this is a bug with exmh per se, but it's something 
>  > that manifests through exmh, so I figured asking you might help me track
>  > it down.
>  > 
>  > When I receive a gpg encrypted message, and it asks me for a passphrase, 
>  > it first tries to ask me via the tty under which exmh is running. It 
>  > tells me my passphrase is incorrect every time, at which point exmh 
>  > offers me the line in the message about decrypting. I click the line 
>  > and it offers me the dialog box, and tells me the passphrase is correct,
>  > and shows me the decrypted message.
>  > 
>  > Any ideas on that?







_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
Exmh-workers@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers


