From: razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Wed Oct  9 18:17:46 2002
Return-Path: <razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EF016F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed,  9 Oct 2002 18:17:45 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:17:45 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g99FH9K08285 for <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:17:09 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17zIVN-0008Dg-00; Wed,
    09 Oct 2002 08:12:09 -0700
Received: from cable-b-36.sigecom.net ([63.69.210.36]
    helo=evv.kamakiriad.local) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp
    (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17zIUi-0003FP-00 for
    <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:11:28 -0700
Received: from aquila.kamakiriad.local (aquila.kamakiriad.local
    [192.168.1.3]) by kamakiriad.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g99FBMP18668
    for <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:11:22 -0500
From: Brian Fahrlander <kilroy@kamakiriad.com>
To: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Razor and Pine
Message-Id: <20021009101127.7bc322fa.kilroy@kamakiriad.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210090900200.4389-100000@tasker.pffcu.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210090900200.4389-100000@tasker.pffcu.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux)
X-Message-Flag: : Shame on you!  You know Outlook is how viruses are spread!
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by kamakiriad.com id
    g99FBMP18668
Sender: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:razor-users-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:razor-users@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users>,
    <mailto:razor-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <razor-users.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users>,
    <mailto:razor-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchives/forum.php?forum=razor-users>
X-Original-Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:11:27 -0500
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:11:27 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by dogma.slashnull.org
    id g99FH9K08285
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL,IN_REP_TO,
	      KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,T_NONSENSE_FROM_00_10,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_10_20,T_NONSENSE_FROM_20_30,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_30_40,T_NONSENSE_FROM_40_50,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_50_60,T_NONSENSE_FROM_60_70,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_70_80,T_NONSENSE_FROM_80_90,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_90_91,T_NONSENSE_FROM_91_92,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_92_93,T_NONSENSE_FROM_93_94,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_94_95,T_NONSENSE_FROM_95_96,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_96_97,T_NONSENSE_FROM_97_98,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_98_99,T_NONSENSE_FROM_99_100
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:15:03 -0400 (EDT), Samuel Checker <sc@pffcu.org> wrote:

> I've been testing Razor, invoked from sendmail/procmail and so far it
> seems pretty copacetic. Last night's spam to the list provided a good test
> - the spam itself as well as several of the responses were flagged, as
> other list members reported.
> 
> This morning I piped the messages out from pine, being careful to use the
> RAW mode, to razor-check -d. None of the messages come back as spam, even
> the spam. Since folks revoked the false positives, I understand why they
> would not come up, but not the spam itself, unless that also was revoked.
> 
> Is this spam just a bad one to test against, or is there some setting in
> pine or razor that I am missing?

    Are you using Spamassassin on the input side?  I've just changed my sendmail installation and am looking for the 'proper' way to pass it through there, systemwide, before accepting it and sending it to the users.  It's kinda problematic to set up procmail scripts for every user, when the user's home directories are NFS mounted....and the source is on my own machine, on which I try new things. (And it's the only machine with the drivespace...)
  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Fahrl�nder              Linux Zealot, Conservative, and Technomad
Evansville, IN                    My Voyage: http://www.CounterMoon.com
ICQ  5119262
------------------------------------------------------------------------
angegangen, Schlange-H�ften, sein es ganz r�ber jetzt. B�gel innen fest,
weil es eine lange, s�sse Fahrt ist. 


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users


