From: exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com  Mon Sep 23 23:22:46 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-workers-admin@example.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9B716F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:22:44 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:22:45 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8NMKYC05203 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:20:34 +0100
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F653FAC3; Mon, 23 Sep 2002
    18:21:02 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.example.com
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D242C3ED67
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:20:05 -0400
    (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g8NMK5U15363 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 23 Sep 2002
    18:20:05 -0400
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8NMK5f15358 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:20:05 -0400
Received: from austin-jump.vircio.com
    (IDENT:PaqNj1KHMBW3ts29O6T1cxNJnauUbcAX@jump-austin.vircio.com
    [192.12.3.99]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8NM2Li02072
    for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:02:21 -0400
Received: (qmail 12567 invoked by uid 104); 23 Sep 2002 22:20:04 -0000
Received: from cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com by localhost.localdomain with
    qmail-scanner-0.90 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4224. . Clean. Processed in 0.349264
    secs); 23/09/2002 17:20:04
Received: from deepeddy.vircio.com (@[10.1.2.1]) (envelope-sender
    <cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com>) by austin-jump.vircio.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with
    SMTP for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; 23 Sep 2002 22:20:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 20959 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2002 22:20:01 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO deepeddy.vircio.com)
    (?79knF7PwThd2vqHi0RyIFdgpFNUhGU3S?@[127.0.0.1]) (envelope-sender
    <cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com>) by localhost (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; 23 Sep 2002 22:20:01 -0000
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Scott Lipcon <slipcon@mercea.net>
Cc: exmh-workers@example.com
Subject: Re: traceback in new exmh
In-Reply-To: <20020923214947.0F481B3F@mercea.net>
References: <20020923214947.0F481B3F@mercea.net>
X-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg
X-Image-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/chris.gif
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
    boundary="==_Exmh_-1590407866P";
    micalg=pgp-sha1;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1032819600.20949.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com>
From: Chris Garrigues <cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com>
X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.57
Reply-To: Chris Garrigues <cwg-dated-1033251601.98fee1@DeepEddy.Com>
X-Loop: exmh-workers@example.com
Sender: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-workers-request@example.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-workers@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers <exmh-workers.example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-workers/>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:19:59 -0500
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,X_LOOP
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

--==_Exmh_-1590407866P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

> From:  Scott Lipcon <slipcon@mercea.net>
> Date:  Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:49:47 -0400
>
> Chris, 
> 
> I'm home now, and this copy of exmh is pretty bad -  I'm running from
> CVS on Sunday night - the only change since then was the one you made
> this morning for "bulletproofing in MhReadSeqs".
> 
> I run exmh, and I can visably see it count up the number of unseen
> messages as it looks through the folders - I have about 3000 unseen
> messages in maybe 10 or 12 folders.    It takes a few seconds for all
> of the folders in the fcache to turn blue.  

This is true...it's now looking at more than just unseen, so it takes a little 
while (in the background) to build the sequences window.  There is probably 
some tuning possible in this area.

> In +inbox, I have 4 unread messages.  They aren't blue, they are
> white background with a normal colored font.

I changed the default display of unseen messages from a foreground of blue to 
a background of white to make it possible to see what other sequences unseen 
messages may be in.  I *did* ask Brent before I did it.  If you like the old 
behavior, the old lines are still in app-defaults-color, but commented out.

> If I click on a message, I get the following traceback:
> 
> invalid command name "Mh_MarkSeen"
>     while executing
> "Mh_MarkSeen $exmh(folder) $msgid"
>     (procedure "Hook_MsgShow_update_unseen" line 5)
>     invoked from within
> "$cmd $mhProfile(path)/$exmh(folder)/$msgid mimeHdr"
>     (procedure "MsgShow" line 23)
>     invoked from within
> "MsgShow $msgid"
>     (procedure "MsgChange" line 18)
>     invoked from within
> "MsgChange 66 show"
>     invoked from within
> "time [list MsgChange $msgid $show"
>     (procedure "Msg_Change" line 3)
>     invoked from within
> "Msg_Change $msgNum $show"
>     (procedure "Msg_Pick" line 8)
>     invoked from within
> "Msg_Pick $lineno show"
>     (procedure "FtocRangeEnd" line 12)
>     invoked from within
> "FtocRangeEnd [lindex [split [.ftoc.t index current] .] 0] 0"
>     (command bound to event)

This is because of your Hook_MsgShow_update_unseen which is calling a function 
which no longer exists.

I suspect you need
	Seq_Del $exmh(folder) unseen $msgid
now instead of 
	Mh_MarkSeen $exmh(folder) $msgid

> It appears that the message does get marked as seen though, as it
> loses the white background, and nmh reports the same.  
> 
> If I click the flist button, it zero's the unseen count, and then
> there is again a visible delay as it counts up all the unseen 
> messages - maybe 3-4 seconds.
> 
> I really think my installation is OK now, but if this behavior is just
> really strange I'll blow everything away and reinstall.  I'm happy to
> spend some time helping to track this down, I don't really need exmh.
> I'm comfortable enough using nmh.
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Exmh-workers mailing list
> Exmh-workers@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers

-- 
Chris Garrigues                 http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
virCIO                          http://www.virCIO.Com
716 Congress, Suite 200
Austin, TX  78701		+1 512 374 0500

  World War III:  The Wrong-Doers Vs. the Evil-Doers.




--==_Exmh_-1590407866P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.2_20000822 06/23/2000

iD8DBQE9j5OPK9b4h5R0IUIRAqAyAJ4t1/YU6tI+81tfv8PS65DO9DiXdACfYxBP
V0bKP6O4yRQjD38MQMxeWcM=
=85Yk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-1590407866P--



_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
Exmh-workers@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers


