From: fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Sep 23 22:47:31 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FD116F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:47:29 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:47:29 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8NICuC29160 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Mon, 23 Sep 2002 19:12:57 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 85A642940DD; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from localhost.localdomain (pm0-37.sba1.netlojix.net
    [207.71.218.37]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE45E29409A for
    <fork@xent.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from dave@localhost) by maltesecat (8.8.7/8.8.7a) id LAA25732;
    Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:18:16 -0700
Message-Id: <200209231818.LAA25732@maltesecat>
To: fork@example.com
Subject: Re: [VoID] a new low on the personals tip...
In-Reply-To: Message from fork-request@xent.com of
    "Tue, 17 Sep 2002 04:29:01 PDT."
    <20020917112901.10408.10485.Mailman@lair.xent.com>
From: Dave Long <dl@silcom.com>
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:18:16 -0700
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 



> *  Too much information?

The saying, as I recall, is along
the lines of "put your best foot
forward".

(In this case, you seem to have put
everything forward, in a Fosbury
Flop consisting of the best foot,
the worst foot, enough arms for a
diety and his consort, and even a
set of spare limbs from Hoffa or
the space aliens or whatever it is
you keep locked up in the trunk of
the Bonneville)

>           ... replied ... in one go, in a matter of minutes. I *do*
> really think this way, complete with footnotes. So if it's too much
> information, I still stand by my reply: I wouldn't be myself if I
> started off playing games.

Pascal could write short letters,
when he had the time.  Is editing
to provide an "executive summary"
really being untrue to yourself?

(We are all used to a full-bore
real-time Rohit streaming, but
that's because we are already
"Friends of", and know to set
our buffers accordingly.  For a
stranger's sake, it may be best
to provide the "elevator pitch
Rohit" -- and negotiate upwards
only after a session has been
established)

-Dave

:::::

Thomas Jefferson writes:
> I served with General Washington in the legislature of Virginia before
> the revolution and during it with Dr. Franklin in Congress. I never
> heard either of them speak [for as long as] ten minutes at a time ...


