From: fork-admin@xent.com  Thu Aug 29 11:27:33 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074EC43F99
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 06:27:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:27:33 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7TASnZ08263 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:28:49 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 7A1BF2940C4; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from mandark.labs.netnoteinc.com (unknown [212.2.188.179]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B5C294099 for <fork@xent.com>;
    Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com
    [192.168.2.14]) by mandark.labs.netnoteinc.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP
    id g7TARC502451; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:27:12 +0100
Received: by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id
    93A1F43F99; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 06:24:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA5933D8D;
    Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:24:44 +0100 (IST)
To: Gary Lawrence Murphy <garym@canada.com>
Cc: harley@argote.ch (Robert Harley), fork@example.com
Subject: Re: Java is for kiddies
In-Reply-To: Message from Gary Lawrence Murphy <garym@canada.com> of
    "28 Aug 2002 15:06:39 EDT."
    <m2vg5u3irk.fsf@maya.dyndns.org>
From: yyyy@example.com (Justin Mason)
X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: 0A48 2D8B 0B52 A87D 0E8A  6ADD 4137 1B50 6E58 EF0A
X-Habeas-Swe-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-Swe-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-Swe-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-Swe-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-Swe-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-Swe-8: Message (HCM) and not spam.  Please report use of this
X-Habeas-Swe-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
Message-Id: <20020829102444.93A1F43F99@phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com>
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:24:39 +0100
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-28.3 required=7.0
	tests=HABEAS_SWE,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
	version=2.40-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 


Gary Lawrence Murphy said:

> I envy some of those posting to this list.  I've been in business for
> 24 years and I haven't yet had the luxury of writing every line of
> code for any project. We are always coerced by budgets and time to
> maximize the amount of work done elsewhere.  

For consultancy, integration or open source work, sure, perl, python or
java with free use of external libs makes a lot of sense IMO.

I should note that normally when I've used C or C++ in the past, it's
dictated by the fact that I would be working on a commercial product,
written from the ground up, where the code you're generating is important
IP for the company; in this case, using a third-party lib often is not an
option, or would be a PITA licensing-wise.

Also, cutting out third-party dependencies can reduce the risk of "oops,
there goes the company that makes that library I depend on, now to shop
around for something vaguely similar, figure out what bugs it's got,
rewrite my code to use the new API, and hope for the best".

This can be a *very* big deal, for obvious reasons ;)    Open source
knockers should note that this is not a problem when using LGPL'd libs ;)

--j.

