From: exmh-users-admin@redhat.com  Tue Sep 10 11:23:35 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-users-admin@example.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA41D16F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:23:34 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:23:34 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8A6BdC19749 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 07:11:39 +0100
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDD23EC9C; Tue, 10 Sep 2002
    02:12:03 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-users@listman.example.com
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056013EA24
    for <exmh-users@listman.redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:11:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g8A6Bom02865 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Tue, 10 Sep 2002
    02:11:50 -0400
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8A6Bnm02860 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:11:49 -0400
Received: from blackcomb.panasas.com (gw2.panasas.com [65.194.124.178]) by
    mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8A5tTv26732 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 01:55:29 -0400
Received: from medlicott.panasas.com (IDENT:welch@medlicott.panasas.com
    [172.17.132.188]) by blackcomb.panasas.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
    CAA13807 for <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:11:43 -0400
Message-Id: <200209100611.CAA13807@blackcomb.panasas.com>
To: exmh-users@example.com
Subject: Re: Patch to complete a change...
In-Reply-To: <5305.1031637136@munnari.OZ.AU>
References: <5305.1031637136@munnari.OZ.AU>
Comments: In-reply-to Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> message dated "Tue,
    10 Sep 2002 12:52:16 +0700."
From: Brent Welch <welch@panasas.com>
X-Url: http://www.panasas.com/
X-Face: "HxE|?EnC9fVMV8f70H83&{fgLE.|FZ^$>@Q(yb#N,Eh~N]e&]=>r5~UnRml1:4EglY{9B+
    :'wJq$@c_C!l8@<$t,{YUr4K,QJGHSvS~U]H`<+L*x?eGzSk>XH\W:AK\j?@?c1o<k;j'Ei/UL)!*0
    ILwSR)J\bc)gjz!rrGQ2#i*f:M:ydhK}jp4dWQW?;0{,#iWrCV$4~%e/3)$1/D
X-Loop: exmh-users@example.com
Sender: exmh-users-admin@example.com
Errors-To: exmh-users-admin@example.com
X-Beenthere: exmh-users@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: exmh-users@example.com
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-users-request@example.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-users@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
    <mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users <exmh-users.example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
    <mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-users/>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 23:11:42 -0700
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.5 required=7.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	      X_LOOP
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

Done

>>>Robert Elz said:
 > I suspect that as part of Chris' set of changes, he cleaned up the
 > use of the variable that was named "L" in FtocCommit (in ftoc.tcl).
 > Its name got changed from L to lineno
 > 
 > But there's one reference of $L left.   That causes tracebacks if
 > you attempt to use "link" with the current CVS version of exmh.
 > 
 > I guess that most of us don't use "link" very often ... I noticed it
 > last week, but only got time to look and see why today.
 > 
 > If someone with the ability to commit to the CVS repository would
 > apply the following patch (to lib/ftoc.tcl) that would be nice.
 > (It works... and is trivial, and you could perhaps just apply it by
 > making the change with an editor faster than saving this patch and
 > applying it - there's only one instance of $L in the file, that
 > should be changed to $lineno)
 > 
 > kre
 > 
 > 
 > --- ftoc.tcl.PREV	Wed Aug 21 15:01:48 2002
 > +++ ftoc.tcl	Tue Sep 10 12:47:06 2002
 > @@ -1131,9 +1131,9 @@
 >  		}
 >  	    }
 >  	    incr ftoc(numMsgs) -1
 >  	} else {
 > -	    FtocUnmarkInner $L
 > +	    FtocUnmarkInner $lineno
 >  	}
 >  	incr ftoc(changed) -1
 >      }
 >      if {$delmsgs != {}} {
 > 
 > --==_Exmh_16073047980--

--
Brent Welch
Software Architect, Panasas Inc
Pioneering the World's Most Scalable and Agile Storage Network
www.panasas.com
welch@panasas.com



_______________________________________________
Exmh-users mailing list
Exmh-users@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users


