From: razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 26 15:21:49 2002
Return-Path: <razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BDB4416B
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:18:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:18:07 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7P3uQZ00566 for <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 04:56:26 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17ioKp-0006T0-00; Sat,
    24 Aug 2002 20:45:07 -0700
Received: from dsl-65-187-98-81.telocity.com ([65.187.98.81]
    helo=home.topshot.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim
    3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17ioKL-0003RJ-00 for
    <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 20:44:38 -0700
Received: from jberry12375l1 (berry12375l.topshot.com [10.0.0.50]) by
    home.topshot.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7P3iATu031394 for
    <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 23:44:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Joe Berry <joe@topshot.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) Personal
Reply-To: Joe Berry <joe@topshot.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-Id: <969536713.20020824234409@topshot.com>
To: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Razor-users] Reducing impact from tons of email
Sender: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:razor-users-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:razor-users@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users>,
    <mailto:razor-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <razor-users.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users>,
    <mailto:razor-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=razor-users>
X-Original-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 23:44:09 -0400
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 23:44:09 -0400
Lines: 47
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=7.0
	tests=FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL,FOR_FREE,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,USER_AGENT_THEBAT
	version=2.40-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

I'm not sure if this is really a razor problem/issue or a sendmail
problem. Here's the scenario... My mail server is a 150mhz PC funning
FreeBSD 4.4. Ordinarily, the machine is quite idle; it supports my
wife's web site with Apache server running on it and a few other
services (jabber, etc). Between the various members of our family, we
get a fair amount of email coming in (mailing lists, etc). On
occasion, our DSL-based ISP dies for a number of hours. When we get a
reconnection to the Internet, I get a huge flow of emails coming in
which are then filtered via razor. As a result, I will sometimes see
over 20+ sendmail processes running at the same time after such an
occasion. The machine is then REALLY slow.

I noticed that my /etc/procmailrc file had had no arguments associated
with the call to razor-check. There was something in the log, though,
to make me suspicious that it was possibly not seeing all my razor
files. So I have just added "-home /etc/razor" as an argument. I
haven't had any down time since then so I cannot comment on whether
this change has sped up my razor processing a noticable amount. (This
paragraph may be an aside to my real problem, the first paragraph
above; but I thought I should be complete in my description.)

At any rate, has anyone else suffered from a backlog of email
processing creating lots and lots of sendmail processes?  Is there,
perhaps, a way to limit the number of sendmail processes?

Any ideas would be welcome.

Thanks,
Joe
---
Joe Berry
joe@topshot.com
AIM "joe topshot"
Yahoo Msgr "joetopshot"
jabber "joetopshot@topshot.com"
Baltimore, MD



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users

