From: exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com  Wed Oct  2 15:58:49 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-workers-admin@example.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C8716F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed,  2 Oct 2002 15:58:48 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 02 Oct 2002 15:58:48 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g92DwjK11512 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:58:46 +0100
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A613EFFA; Wed,  2 Oct 2002
    09:59:19 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.example.com
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FFC3F792
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Wed,  2 Oct 2002 09:54:12 -0400
    (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g92DsCq16707 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 2 Oct 2002
    09:54:12 -0400
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g92DsCf16703 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:54:12 -0400
Received: from kcmso2.proxy.att.com (kcmso2.att.com [192.128.134.71]) by
    mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g92DZMi25039 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:35:22 -0400
Received: from ulysses.homer.att.com ([135.205.193.8]) by
    kcmso2.proxy.att.com (AT&T IPNS/MSO-4.0) with ESMTP id g92Ds6Od028475 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:54:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from hera.homer.att.com (hera.homer.att.com [135.205.193.102])
    by ulysses.homer.att.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA05531 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:54:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hera.homer.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    hera.homer.att.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA13534 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:54:04 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200210021354.JAA13534@hera.homer.att.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5-CVS 08/22/2002 with nmh-1.0.4
To: exmh-workers@example.com
Subject: A couple of nits...
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: "J. W. Ballantine" <jwb@homer.att.com>
X-Loop: exmh-workers@example.com
Sender: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-workers-request@example.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-workers@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers <exmh-workers.example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-workers/>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 09:54:04 -0400
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0
	tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,X_LOOP
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 


I have a couple of small issues, and I'm not sure if their exmh issues
or my setup issues.

First, when I try and run exmh with wish from tk8.4.0 it seems to take
forever to start, but with wish from tk8.a.4 it starts in a snap.

Using the latest CVS, when I open exmh and the folder I'm in has unseen
messages and I hit next, exmh changes to the next folder with unseen messages
rather than to the first unseen in the current folder.

Finally, when I reach the end of the messages in a folder and go on to
the next unseen, exmh always goes back to inbox (which has no unseen
messages) rather than the next folder with unseen messages.  (When I 
goto next from inbox it does go where I would think it should go).

Just wanted to let you know what I'm seeing and find out if I'm expecting
some different than I should be.

Thanks for all the effort

Jim




_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
Exmh-workers@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers


