From: exmh-users-admin@redhat.com  Wed Oct  9 22:41:06 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-users-admin@example.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D59A16F1A
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed,  9 Oct 2002 22:40:01 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 22:40:01 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g99IXOK16457 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:33:24 +0100
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98E741C72; Wed,  9 Oct 2002
    14:32:34 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-users@listman.example.com
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7F742312
    for <exmh-users@listman.redhat.com>; Wed,  9 Oct 2002 14:18:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g99IIIe01687 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 9 Oct 2002
    14:18:18 -0400
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g99IIHf01680 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:18:17 -0400
Received: from sherman.stortek.com (sherman.stortek.com [129.80.22.146])
    by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g99HwUX03598 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:58:30 -0400
Received: from sherman.stortek.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    sherman.stortek.com (8.12.3/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g99II9OH006838 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:18:09 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from vinson-ether1.stortek.com (vinson-ether1.stortek.com
    [129.80.16.134]) by sherman.stortek.com (8.12.3/8.12.0) with ESMTP id
    g99II8s3006835 for <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:18:08 -0600
    (MDT)
Received: from tatanka.stortek.com (tatanka.stortek.com [129.80.90.4]) by
    vinson-ether1.stortek.com (8.12.3/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g99II8qv021686 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:18:08 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from tatanka (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tatanka.stortek.com
    (8.11.6+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g99IGd904228 for <exmh-users@redhat.com>;
    Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:16:43 -0600 (MDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: exmh-users@example.com
Subject: Re: From
In-Reply-To: Your message of
    "Wed, 09 Oct 2002 12:57:13 EDT."
    <200210091657.g99GvDmX025433@life.ai.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <4226.1034187399@tatanka>
From: "James C. McMaster (Jim)" <mcmasjc@tatanka.stortek.com>
X-Loop: exmh-users@example.com
Sender: exmh-users-admin@example.com
Errors-To: exmh-users-admin@example.com
X-Beenthere: exmh-users@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: exmh-users@example.com
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-users-request@example.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-users@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
    <mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users <exmh-users.example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
    <mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-users/>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 12:16:39 -0600
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_00_10,T_NONSENSE_FROM_10_20,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_20_30,T_NONSENSE_FROM_30_40,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_40_50,T_NONSENSE_FROM_50_60,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_60_70,T_NONSENSE_FROM_70_80,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_80_90,T_NONSENSE_FROM_90_91,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_91_92,T_NONSENSE_FROM_92_93,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_93_94,T_NONSENSE_FROM_94_95,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_95_96,T_NONSENSE_FROM_96_97,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_97_98,T_NONSENSE_FROM_98_99,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_99_100,X_LOOP
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

This is not an exmh problem, but an interaction between sendmail, Solaris and 
mh.

Your sysadmin is wrong.  It is the responsibility of the receiving mail 
server to escape lines beginning with "From " if they choose to turn on that 
facility.  It is not the responsibility for email clients to cater to the 
stupid design of the unix mail spool, and Sun's even more stupid decision to 
rely on "Content-length:" instead of dealing with this problem.  Since mh is 
unaware of "Content-length:", rcvstore gags trying to parse messages from the 
spool.

I had this same problem.  There are several ways to fix it:

1)  Get your mail administrator to add the "E" flag to your sendmail.  This 
means you will never see a line beginning with "From ".  Any such line will 
look like ">From ".

2)  There is a patch to mh to make it respect "Content-length:".  When I was 
having this problem, porting this patch to nmh was low on the priority list, 
then nmh development stalled for a long time.  I doubt it has been done, but 
you can check with the nmh list at nmh-workers@mhost.com to find out for sure.

3)  You can learn to use procmail, invoking rcvstore directly instead of 
letting sendmail put your incoming mail into the spool.  This avoids the 
whole issue.  rcvstore only deals with a single message at a time, and 
everything works.
-- 
Jim McMaster
mailto:mcmasjc@tatanka.stortek.com


In message <200210091657.g99GvDmX025433@life.ai.mit.edu>, Jason Rennie said:
> 
> When I receive a message that has a line starting with "From ", it's
> broken into two messages.  I get my mail from /var/spool/mail.  The
> program that incorporates mail thinks that the "From " line starts a new
> message.
> 
> My sysadmins have told me that the sending mail client is supposed to 
> escape lines begining with "From ".  EXMH (2.5) doesn't do this.  Should 
> it?  It appears that my MH is MH 6.8.  Does NMH fix this?
> 
> Jason D. M. Rennie
> MIT AI Lab
> jrennie@ai.mit.edu
> (617) 253-5339
> http://www.ai.mit.edu/~jrennie/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Exmh-users mailing list
> Exmh-users@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users
> 




_______________________________________________
Exmh-users mailing list
Exmh-users@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users


