From: fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Oct  7 21:56:36 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86A616F18
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  7 Oct 2002 21:56:13 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 07 Oct 2002 21:56:13 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g97JjsK14541 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:45:55 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 793592940D5; Mon,  7 Oct 2002 12:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from sunserver.permafrost.net (u172n16.hfx.eastlink.ca
    [24.222.172.16]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCB52940D4 for
    <fork@xent.com>; Mon,  7 Oct 2002 12:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.123.179] (helo=permafrost.net) by
    sunserver.permafrost.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id
    17ydfa-00074D-00; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 16:35:58 -0300
Message-Id: <3DA1E514.9080807@permafrost.net>
From: Owen Byrne <owen@permafrost.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Long <dl@silcom.com>
Cc: fork@example.com
Subject: Re: erratum [Re: no matter ...] & errors
References: <200210071841.LAA25074@maltesecat>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 16:48:36 -0300
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.7 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,T_NONSENSE_FROM_00_10,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

Dave Long wrote:

>><http://www.iht.com/articles/72079.htm>
>>    
>>
>>>"The United States is the only country in the world to tax its citizens
>>>on a worldwide basis, ...
>>>      
>>>
>
>I am told this is also true (at least)
>for Australia.  I suppose I shouldn't
>rely upon editorial fact-checking.
>
>::::::
>
>  
>
>>                              If they manage to emulate the process
>>that occurred in Northern Ireland, then maybe in 20 years or so
>>they'll be yelling at each other across the floor of some legislative
>>assembly instead.  Label me an optimist.
>>    
>>
>
>Since "let's you and him fight" worked
>so remarkably poorly in Ireland, there
>must've been plenty of places it worked
>well for the British to have tried it
>again in Israel.  What were they?
>
>-Dave
>  
>
I'm not sure what you mean by "let's you and him fight", but it is 
important to remember that England was in control of Ireland
for 300 years, and that it was only thanks to the distraction of WW I 
that the south managed to gain its independence. If you mean
splitting countries upon arbitrary lines and assigning different groups 
to opposite sides of the line, it also seems to have not worked in
India/Pakistan.
I suppose Canada, which is supposed to be a "loose confederation" of 2 
founding nations (French and English) can be cited as a success. The 
jury is still out, but so far only a few brief rebellions and 
referendums and such, still together after 130+ years.

Owen



