From: fork-admin@xent.com  Tue Sep  3 14:24:46 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E969316F3E
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue,  3 Sep 2002 14:23:04 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 03 Sep 2002 14:23:05 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g836KxZ07386 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Tue, 3 Sep 2002 07:20:59 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 7A8812941C2; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 23:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from venus.phpwebhosting.com (venus.phpwebhosting.com
    [64.29.16.27]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AECF294199 for
    <fork@xent.com>; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 23:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 5529 invoked by uid 508); 3 Sep 2002 06:20:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hydrogen.leitl.org) (217.80.40.48) by
    venus.phpwebhosting.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2002 06:20:00 -0000
Received: from localhost (eugen@localhost) by hydrogen.leitl.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g836JvX03835; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 08:19:57 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: hydrogen.leitl.org: eugen owned process doing -bs
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
To: "Adam L. Beberg" <beberg@mithral.com>
Cc: RossO <fork@ordersomewherechaos.com>, <fork@example.com>
Subject: Re: Electric car an Edsel...
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209022109001.8806-100000@watcher.mithral.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209030813420.3124-100000@hydrogen.leitl.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 08:19:57 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.7 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE,
	      X_AUTH_WARNING
	version=2.41-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Adam L. Beberg wrote:

> Battery pack, huh what???
> 
> You dont use batteries for a 1/4 mile run, you use capacitors. MANY times

Actually, you use both.

> the energy density, and you can get the energy out fast enough. Note that

No, even best supercapacitors are a long way to go from reasonably good 
electrochemical energy sources. But you can recharge and discharge them 
very quickly, and they take lots more of cycles than the best battery. 
Ideal for absorbing the braking energy and turn them into smoking tires 
few moments or minutes afterwards.

> the battery packs are fully swapped out for recharging after each run
> anyway, just like a gas dragster is refueled, so this wouldnt be cheating.
> 200 MPH should be no problem.

I don't see any reason why EVs shouldn't dominate dragster runs. The
traction is the limiting factor, not motor power. You can basically put
the motors into wheelhubs mounted on a composite frame, and dump juice
into them until they melt, which will be some 100 sec downstream. Plenty
of time to smoke anything.

Of course, it doesn't roar, and spew smokage, so it won't happen.


