From: fork-admin@xent.com  Tue Aug 27 17:34:36 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D392343F99
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 12:34:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 27 Aug 2002 17:34:35 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7RGUhZ16819 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Tue, 27 Aug 2002 17:30:43 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 5B27D294204; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from panacea.canonical.org (ns1.canonical.org [209.115.72.29])
    by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625DA2940CE for <fork@xent.com>;
    Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by panacea.canonical.org (Postfix, from userid 1004) id
    3C5C23F4F3; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 12:27:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Kragen Sitaker <kragen@pobox.com>
To: fork@example.com
Subject: Re: The MIME information you requested (last changed 3154 Feb 14)
Message-Id: <20020827162740.GA24107@canonical.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 12:27:40 -0400
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=7.0
	tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,
	      SUBJECT_MONTH,SUBJECT_MONTH_2,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.40-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

Justin Mason writes:
> Has anyone figured out what's up with this?  Does someone out there
> think that FoRK needs some MIME tutoring?

I was puzzled at first, but I think I understand what happened.

First, I approved the post because it didn't appear to be spam, even
though it wasn't from a member.  I thought it was odd that someone
wanted to send the MIME blurb to the list, but it was not really that
different from causing the New York Times web site to send a story to
the list.  (Except that the bits here are antediluvian, but old bits are
a problem to be solved by social opporobrium, not technical constraints.)

But I think what actually happened is that some idiot got infected by
Klez and had both FoRK and the pine-robot autoresponder address in their
mailbox or addressbook, so Klez forged mail from fork@xent.com to the
autoresponder, which responded.  To FoRK.

