From: rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net  Wed Oct  9 22:42:55 2002
Return-Path: <rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3BD16F6E
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed,  9 Oct 2002 22:41:09 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 22:41:09 +0100 (IST)
Received: from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g99L3YK21522 for
    <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 22:03:34 +0100
Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by egwn.net
    (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g99Kn2f25952; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 22:49:02
    +0200
Received: from python (80-24-132-206.uc.nombres.ttd.es [80.24.132.206])
    (authenticated) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id
    g99Klvf22559 for <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 22:47:57 +0200
From: Matthias Saou <matthias@rpmforge.net>
To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
Subject: Re: Apt 0.3 and 0.5
Message-Id: <20021009224706.5996f983.matthias@rpmforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <1034194128.19400.49.camel@wintermute.sr.unh.edu>
References: <1034194128.19400.49.camel@wintermute.sr.unh.edu>
Organization: freshrpms.net / rpmforge.net
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux)
X-Operating-System: Red Hat GNU/Linux forever!
X-Subliminal-Message: Use Linux... use Linux... use Linux...
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
List-Help: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist-request@freshrpms.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list <rpm-zzzlist.freshrpms.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/rpm-zzzlist/>
X-Original-Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 22:47:06 +0200
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 22:47:06 +0200
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-17.8 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,RCVD_IN_RFCI,REFERENCES,
	      REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_00_10,T_NONSENSE_FROM_10_20,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_20_30,T_NONSENSE_FROM_30_40,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_40_50,T_NONSENSE_FROM_50_60,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_60_70,T_NONSENSE_FROM_70_80,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_80_90,T_NONSENSE_FROM_90_91,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_91_92,T_NONSENSE_FROM_92_93,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_93_94,T_NONSENSE_FROM_94_95,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_95_96,T_NONSENSE_FROM_96_97,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_97_98,T_NONSENSE_FROM_98_99,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_99_100
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

Once upon a time, Thomas wrote :

> Should I expect problems if my apt server is running RH 7.3/Apt 0.3 and
> some clients are coming on line and will be running RH 8.0/Apt 0.5? Do
> the two different version interoperate?

No problems whatsoever. Currently apt.freshrpms.net is running 7.3 with apt
0.3 and many 8.0 clients with 0.5 are using it.

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla) running Linux kernel 2.4.18-10
Load : 0.10 0.11 0.10, AC on-line, battery charging: 100% (1:47)

_______________________________________________
RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list


