From: rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net  Thu Oct  3 19:28:33 2002
Return-Path: <rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC13016F16
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu,  3 Oct 2002 19:28:32 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 03 Oct 2002 19:28:32 +0100 (IST)
Received: from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g93H4gK06207 for
    <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:04:43 +0100
Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by egwn.net
    (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g93H04f17315; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:00:04
    +0200
Received: from swampfox.owlriver.com (swampfox.owlriver.com
    [206.21.107.147]) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id
    g93GxHf13656 for <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:59:17 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by swampfox.owlriver.com
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g93GxFB24532 for <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>;
    Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:59:15 -0400
From: R P Herrold <herrold@owlriver.com>
To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
Subject: Re: f-rpm] Python 2.2 site libs?
In-Reply-To: <1810000.1033647373@spawn.se7en.org>
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210031255050.20571-100000@swampfox.owlriver.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
List-Help: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist-request@freshrpms.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list <rpm-zzzlist.freshrpms.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/rpm-zzzlist/>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:59:15 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:59:15 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,T_NONSENSE_FROM_10_20,
	      USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Mark Derricutt wrote:

> Anyone know why Red Hat insist on sticking with python 1.5.2?

ehhh?  IANAHNBARHE -- RHL 8.0 is fully python-2, with a back
compatability v 1 shim set.  This has been working and freely
available in their Raw Hide for 5 months for early adopters
and back-porters.

Red Hat maintains binary compatability across major releases.  
Its server management tools are heavily Python, and becoming 
more so.

To have added mid-stream the python-2 series in the RHL 7.x
series would have been quite disruptive to an existing 
installed base.

-- Russ Herrold



_______________________________________________
RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list


