From: exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com  Wed Sep 11 21:29:16 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-workers-admin@example.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1999E16F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:29:16 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:29:16 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BJvaC29683 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:57:36 +0100
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E614140976; Wed, 11 Sep 2002
    15:54:46 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.example.com
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AF13F2EE
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:52:54 -0400
    (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g8BJqnR26738 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 11 Sep 2002
    15:52:49 -0400
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8BJqmk26734 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:52:48 -0400
Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu (turing-police.cc.vt.edu
    [128.173.14.107]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id
    g8BJaKw00436 for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:36:20
    -0400
Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    turing-police.cc.vt.edu (8.12.6.Beta1/8.12.6.Beta1) with ESMTP id
    g8BJqPrl020350; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:52:25 -0400
Message-Id: <200209111952.g8BJqPrl020350@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4+dev
To: Brent Welch <welch@panasas.com>
Cc: Hacksaw <hacksaw@hacksaw.org>, exmh-workers@example.com
Subject: Re: exmh bug?
In-Reply-To: Your message of
    "Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:17:33 PDT."
    <200209111917.PAA02912@blackcomb.panasas.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
X-Url: http://black-ice.cc.vt.edu/~valdis/
X-Face-Viewer: See ftp://cs.indiana.edu/pub/faces/index.html to decode picture
X-Face: 34C9$Ewd2zeX+\!i1BA\j{ex+$/V'JBG#;3_noWWYPa"|,I#`R"{n@w>#:{)FXyiAS7(8t(
    ^*w5O*!8O9YTe[r{e%7(yVRb|qxsRYw`7J!`AM}m_SHaj}f8eb@d^L>BrX7iO[<!v4-0bVIpaxF#-)
    %9#a9h6JXI|T|8o6t\V?kGl]Q!1V]GtNliUtz:3},0"hkPeBuu%E,j(:\iOX-P,t7lRR#
References: <200209111917.PAA02912@blackcomb.panasas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
    boundary="==_Exmh_9304186P";
    micalg=pgp-sha1;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Loop: exmh-workers@example.com
Sender: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-workers-request@example.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-workers@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers <exmh-workers.example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-workers/>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:52:25 -0400
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.5 required=7.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NO_REAL_NAME,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,X_LOOP
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

--==_Exmh_9304186P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:17:33 PDT, Brent Welch said:

> >>>Hacksaw said:

>  > When I receive a gpg encrypted message, and it asks me for a passphrase, 
> it
>  > first tries to ask me via the tty under which exmh is running. It tells 
>
Hmm.. I've seen the *opposite* issue - if I go to *SEND* a signed message,
sometimes Exmh will put up the dialog box, but fail to set keyboard focus
there, so no passphrase can be entered.  Of course, hitting 'return' doesnt
work so you need to click the 'OK' box, at which point it finds that the
passphrase that wasn't entered doesn't work, and asks again, this time with
proper focus set.

I suspect some variable/codepath is getting hosed for the focus, or possibly
some borkedness with --no-tty and/or --status-fd flags to gnupg.

/Valdis

--==_Exmh_9304186P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQE9f575cC3lWbTT17ARApK5AKD+PToDpgdcd0Ore2BwJ1qVakfMDgCcDRsa
HqcPiRZRSxFvAQBe+Ma1qmY=
=lXe4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_9304186P--



_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
Exmh-workers@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers


