From: fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Sep  9 10:46:24 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6466316F1E
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  9 Sep 2002 10:45:56 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 10:45:56 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g893aMC30158 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Mon, 9 Sep 2002 04:36:22 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 59F822942C0; Sun,  8 Sep 2002 20:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (mta7.pltn13.pbi.net [64.164.98.8]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7ADB2942BF for <fork@xent.com>;
    Sun,  8 Sep 2002 20:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.123.100] ([64.173.24.253]) by mta7.pltn13.pbi.net
    (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May  7 2001)) with ESMTP id
    <0H25005UQJA6KW@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> for fork@xent.com; Sun,
    08 Sep 2002 20:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Rogers <jamesr@best.com>
Subject: Re: earthviewer (was Re: whoa}
In-Reply-To: <m2bs77uaea.fsf@maya.dyndns.org>
To: fork@example.com
Message-Id: <B9A164ED.D809%jamesr@best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.1.3108
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 20:34:54 -0700
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.1 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,INVALID_MSGID,IN_REP_TO,
	      KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_ENTOURAGE
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

On 9/8/02 8:09 PM, "Gary Lawrence Murphy" <garym@canada.com> wrote:
> My car is only just over 1.5 meters across and maybe 3 meters long, so
> that means roughly six pixels total surface area.  You might find a
> 16-wheeler this way, but how often do people misplace a 16-wheeler
> such that it is _that_ important to get old images of the terrain?
> Since they can't send up aircraft to update images in realtime every
> time, how is this different from just releasing the map on DVDs?  Why
> wireless?


It seems that several people are missing the point that this is NOT an image
database.  It is high-resolution topological data rendered in three
dimensions.  Images are overlayed on the topological data to help people
navigate familiar terrain visually.  In other words, it is not intended as a
wannabe spy satellite.  Rather it is a very accurate three dimensional model
of the earth's surface.  When a particular region in question is covered in
a city, the buildings in the city are mapped as though they are part of the
earth's surface.  The part that makes the app killer is that you can map all
sorts of data layers on top of their core topological data.

Got it?

-James Rogers
 jamesr@best.com


