From: rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net  Sat Oct  5 17:21:50 2002
Return-Path: <rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8425216F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Sat,  5 Oct 2002 17:21:49 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 05 Oct 2002 17:21:49 +0100 (IST)
Received: from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g95DOfK10926 for
    <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:24:42 +0100
Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by egwn.net
    (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g95DE2f01952; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:14:02
    +0200
Received: from bennew01.localdomain (pD900DDC6.dip.t-dialin.net
    [217.0.221.198]) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id
    g95DD2f29025 for <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:13:02 +0200
Received: from bennew01.localdomain (bennew01.localdomain [192.168.3.1])
    by bennew01.localdomain (8.12.5/linuxconf) with SMTP id g95DCmUv028047 for
    <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:12:49 +0200
From: Matthias Haase <matthias_haase@bennewitz.com>
To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
Subject: Re: RedHat 8.0 and his own freetype
Message-Id: <20021005151248.2184c904.matthias_haase@bennewitz.com>
In-Reply-To: <3D9E1F20.3050300@eecs.berkeley.edu>
References: <20021004155451.52f9ecd5.matthias_haase@bennewitz.com>
    <3D9E1F20.3050300@eecs.berkeley.edu>
X-Operating-System: customized linux smp kernel 2.4* on i686
X-Mailer: Sylpheed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
List-Help: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist-request@freshrpms.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list <rpm-zzzlist.freshrpms.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/rpm-zzzlist/>
X-Original-Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:12:48 +0200
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:12:48 +0200
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_40_50
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

On Fri, 04 Oct 2002 16:07:12 -0700
Ben Liblit <liblit@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:

> So if your fonts look ugly, lack of bytecode hinting is *not* the cause.

Well you are right, sorry, I didn't have any better idea yesterday late in
the evening.
The fonts are ugly only inside of gnome2 and clean for gnome1 apps, if
antialiasing is disabled. 
This is difficult to understand for me.

--
regards from Germany
                   Matthias
      

_______________________________________________
RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list


