From: fork-admin@xent.com  Thu Sep 19 16:25:57 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2750716F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 16:25:57 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 19 Sep 2002 16:25:57 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8JDdtC21726 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:39:56 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id EC3D9294109; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 06:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from imo-d07.mx.aol.com (imo-d07.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.39]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734B829409E for <fork@xent.com>;
    Thu, 19 Sep 2002 06:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ThosStew@aol.com by imo-d07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.10.)
    id 2.d3.11f46440 (4410) for <fork@xent.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:39:00
    -0400 (EDT)
From: ThosStew@aol.com
Message-Id: <d3.11f46440.2abb2d74@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Hanson's Sept 11 message in the National Review
Cc: fork@example.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Mac sub 45
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:39:00 EDT
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,MISSING_HEADERS,
	      NO_REAL_NAME
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 


In a message dated 9/19/2002 7:46:37 AM, chuck@topsail.org writes:

>That means *you* can't say anything may not be FoRKed or printed or 
>whatever. You have the choice to ignore it


That's not what the First Amendment says at all. It says that Congress cannot 
say what can't be FoRKed. FoRK can establish any rules it wants. Similarly, 
The New York Times gets to choose what news IT thinks is "fit to print." If 
the Times chose not to print anything about, say, Rosie O'Donnell, it would 
be exercising its First Amendment rights, just as much as it would be if it 
chose to print something Rosie O'Donnell doesn't like. The necessary 
corollary of the freedom to say/publish what one wants is the freedom to 
refuse to publish or say what one doesn't like. The alternative is a 
state-controlled press that reprints government press releases and calls them 
news.

The question of what is or is not FoRKed is (except for libel or other 
specific exceptions) not a matter of law, but a matter of what the 
"publisher" (if any) decides or the "community" (if any) negotiates or does 
as a matter of custom.

For my part, I'd rather people didn't use FoRK as a place in which to dump an 
expression of their political beliefs.

Tom


