From: rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net  Tue Oct  1 10:38:20 2002
Return-Path: <rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C4316F17
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue,  1 Oct 2002 10:38:19 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 01 Oct 2002 10:38:19 +0100 (IST)
Received: from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g918akK17092 for
    <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:36:46 +0100
Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by egwn.net
    (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g918S1f18842; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:28:01
    +0200
Received: from urgent.rug.ac.be (urgent.rug.ac.be [157.193.88.1]) by
    egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with SMTP id g918Rff18785 for
    <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:27:41 +0200
Received: (qmail 32408 invoked by uid 505); 1 Oct 2002 08:27:47 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP;
    1 Oct 2002 08:27:47 -0000
From: Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas@urgent.rug.ac.be>
To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
Subject: Re: use new apt to do null to RH8 upgrade?
In-Reply-To: <20021001.t5w.10103800@www.dudex.net>
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210011026020.19273-100000@urgent.rug.ac.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
List-Help: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist-request@freshrpms.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list <rpm-zzzlist.freshrpms.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/rpm-zzzlist/>
X-Original-Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:27:47 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:27:47 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

> Is it possible to use new apt to do (null) to RH8 upgrade?

It might be, don't think anyone tried it yet.

> Even if it's possible, are there good reasons why maybe I should not do it and
> just use the RH iso's (I don't think RH8 will upgrade from (null), maybe up2date
> will)?

Yes ;)

first off, redhat does not support upgrading from beta's to the released 
version.  That doesn't mean it can't work, it means nobody tried it, they 
sure didn't test it or fix anything to make it work, and you're on your 
own.

second, historically a new .0 numbers mostly means "so much has been 
changed that you might have problems upgrading from any previous release 
anyway".  So, historically, most users installing a .0 release do this 
from scratch anyway, doing upgrades throughout x.0->x.y.

If you want to avoid problems, bite the bullet and reinstall ;)

Thomas

 -- 

The Dave/Dina Project : future TV today ! - http://davedina.apestaart.org/
<-*-                      -*->
And every time she sneezes
I think it's love and oh lord
I'm not ready for this sort of thing
<-*- thomas@apestaart.org -*->
URGent, the best radio on the Internet - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.rug.ac.be/


_______________________________________________
RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list


