From: fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Sep  9 10:46:03 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995E316F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  9 Sep 2002 10:45:45 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 10:45:45 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g88NRCC16739 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Mon, 9 Sep 2002 00:27:13 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id D97302941C7; Sun,  8 Sep 2002 16:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from panacea.canonical.org (ns1.canonical.org [209.115.72.29])
    by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EE52941C4 for <fork@xent.com>;
    Sun,  8 Sep 2002 16:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by panacea.canonical.org (Postfix, from userid 1004) id
    51F943F4E8; Sun,  8 Sep 2002 19:24:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: kragen@pobox.com (Kragen Sitaker)
To: fork@example.com
Subject: earthviewer (was Re: whoa}
Message-Id: <20020908232416.51F943F4E8@panacea.canonical.org>
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Sun,  8 Sep 2002 19:24:16 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

On 9/8/02 7:38 AM, "Gary Lawrence Murphy" <garym@canada.com> wrote:
>   J> ...  If you want a region of the globe mapped out to a very
>   J> high resolution (e.g. 1-meter), they can scan the area with
>   J> aircraft LIDAR and add it to the database, thereby making that
>   J> region zoomable to the resolution of the database for that
>   J> area.  
> 
> Can you give us an example of an application where 1-m resolution
> would be worth the considerable expense?

Planning battle tactics; for this reason, the intelligence press
reports, spy satellites have had 1-meter resolution for many years.

Finding an individual vehicle in a city might occasionally be possible
with 1-m images and might occasionally also be worth the money.

For small areas you have legitimate access to, it's probably cheaper
to go there with a digital camera and a GPS and take some snapshots
from ground level.  Aerial photos might be cheaper for large areas,
areas where you're not allowed --- or, perhaps, physically able --- to
go, and cases where you don't have time to send a ground guy around
the whole area.

-- 
<kragen@pobox.com>       Kragen Sitaker     <http://www.pobox.com/~kragen/>
Edsger Wybe Dijkstra died in August of 2002.  The world has lost a great
man.  See http://advogato.org/person/raph/diary.html?start=252 and
http://www.kode-fu.com/geek/2002_08_04_archive.shtml for details.


