From: fork-admin@xent.com  Sat Sep  7 21:53:30 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE34616F16
	for <jm@localhost>; Sat,  7 Sep 2002 21:52:37 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 07 Sep 2002 21:52:37 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g87Du7C22075 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Sat, 7 Sep 2002 14:56:07 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id AD1A32940A0; Sat,  7 Sep 2002 06:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from argote.ch (argote.ch [80.65.224.17]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 4B03129409E for <fork@xent.com>; Sat,  7 Sep 2002 06:52:10
    -0700 (PDT)
Received: by argote.ch (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7E5CBC44D;
    Sat,  7 Sep 2002 15:52:57 +0200 (CEST)
To: fork@example.com
Subject: Re: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
Message-Id: <20020907135257.7E5CBC44D@argote.ch>
From: harley@argote.ch (Robert Harley)
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Sat,  7 Sep 2002 15:52:57 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=7.0
	tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

CDale URLed thusly:
>http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2000/10.19/01_monogamy.html

>The assumption that females of all species tend to be less promiscuous
>than males simply does not fit the facts, Hrdy contended.

Well, DUH!!!

It is perfectly obvious that (heterosexual) promiscuity is exactly,
precisely identical between males and females.

Of course the shapes of the distributions may differ.


R


