From: rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net  Thu Oct  3 16:02:55 2002
Return-Path: <rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA94516F17
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu,  3 Oct 2002 16:02:53 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 03 Oct 2002 16:02:53 +0100 (IST)
Received: from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g93DOZK30584 for
    <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:24:40 +0100
Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by egwn.net
    (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g93DM6f02996; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:22:06
    +0200
Received: from mail.phy.duke.edu (mail.phy.duke.edu [152.3.182.2]) by
    egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g93DKbf24978 for
    <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:20:37 +0200
Received: from opus.phy.duke.edu (opus.phy.duke.edu [152.3.182.42]) by
    mail.phy.duke.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D477030199 for
    <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Thu,  3 Oct 2002 09:20:35 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Python 2.2 site libs?
From: seth vidal <skvidal@phy.duke.edu>
To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
In-Reply-To: <1810000.1033647373@spawn.se7en.org>
References: <1810000.1033647373@spawn.se7en.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature";
    boundary="=-ITC4wxYrfSWQCmQFalKh"
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6)
Message-Id: <1033651236.19916.1.camel@opus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
List-Help: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist-request@freshrpms.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list <rpm-zzzlist.freshrpms.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/rpm-zzzlist/>
X-Original-Date: 03 Oct 2002 09:20:33 -0400
Date: 03 Oct 2002 09:20:33 -0400
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,T_NONSENSE_FROM_30_40
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 


--=-ITC4wxYrfSWQCmQFalKh
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 08:16, Mark Derricutt wrote:
> Anyone know where one could get rpms for alot of the python libraries for=
=20
> 2.2?
>=20
> Its darn annoying the way RH ship python 1.5.2 and python 2.2 (as python2=
)=20
> and libs that only work with one or the other :(
>=20
> esp. the pgdb and xml modules.
>=20
> Anyone know why Red Hat insist on sticking with python 1.5.2?
>

they are on python 2.2 for 8.0 - but they don't like to break
compatibility during major releases.

therefore: 6.X was 1.5.2 b/c that was current
7.x was 1.5.2 b/c that was current when 7.0 was released.

-sv


--=-ITC4wxYrfSWQCmQFalKh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA9nEQh1Aj3x2mIbMcRAg/FAJ9MNwAv4hzpR4gjkMGGtGUjFKidQQCgk0ZE
DlQVAibjHkM4H9ZBYzs0xb4=
=8gIA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-ITC4wxYrfSWQCmQFalKh--


_______________________________________________
RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list


