From: craig@deersoft.com  Fri Aug 23 11:03:54 2002
Return-Path: <craig@deersoft.com>
Delivered-To: zzzz@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BBB44156
	for <zzzz@localhost>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:03:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:03:29 +0100 (IST)
Received: from hall.mail.mindspring.net (hall.mail.mindspring.net
    [207.69.200.60]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7MISAZ19627 for <zzzz@example.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:28:10 +0100
Received: from user-105nd99.dialup.mindspring.com ([64.91.181.41]
    helo=belphegore.hughes-family.org) by hall.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp
    (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17hwgo-00049c-00; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:28:14 -0400
Received: from balam.hughes-family.org
    (adsl-67-118-234-50.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.118.234.50]) by
    belphegore.hughes-family.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05665A3FD9;
    Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:28:13 -0700
Subject: Re: [SAdev] 2.40 RELEASE PROCESS: mass-check status, folks?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482)
Cc: "Malte S. Stretz" <msquadrat.nospamplease@gmx.net>,
	SpamAssassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	SpamAssassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
To: zzzz@example.com (Justin Mason)
From: "Craig R.Hughes" <craig@deersoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020822172428.4FCCD43F99@phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com>
Message-Id: <EB0AF9F0-B5FC-11D6-A91E-00039396ECF2@deersoft.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482)


On Thursday, August 22, 2002, at 10:24  AM, Justin Mason wrote:

> I plan to
>
> 1. figure out the freqs tonight, suggest what tests to drop
> 2. wait for comments
> 3. drop tests that nobody cares about tomorrow
> 4. sed out the dropped tests from the mass-check logs

This step is unneccesary -- unless you've changed the scripts 
much, any test in the logs which aren't in the rules files will 
just be ignored I think.  You do seem to have changed the 
logs-to-c script and removed the bit where you could specify 
immutable tests at the top -- I took a brief glance through the 
code and couldn't fully make out how it had changed.  I think we 
want to be able to specify immutable test scores though in there 
somewhere -- or is that now handled by the tflags stuff?  For 
the last couple releases, any test which occurred infrequently 
(by thumb-in-the-wind subjective criteria) I set to have 
immutable scores, as well as a handful of other rules.

> 5. kick off the GA
>
> BTW I'll be away this weekend at Linuxbierwanderung, so Craig, 
> you might
> have to run the GA. ;)

Shouldn't be a problem.  Assuming I can get the darned thing to 
compile :)

C


