From: fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Sep  9 14:34:38 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86F816EFC
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  9 Sep 2002 14:34:37 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 14:34:37 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g89DS9C15806 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:28:10 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id A7D812942D6; Mon,  9 Sep 2002 06:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from venus.phpwebhosting.com (venus.phpwebhosting.com
    [64.29.16.27]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E3032940B8 for
    <fork@xent.com>; Mon,  9 Sep 2002 06:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 5996 invoked by uid 508); 9 Sep 2002 13:27:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hydrogen.leitl.org) (217.80.40.112) by
    venus.phpwebhosting.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 13:27:23 -0000
Received: from localhost (eugen@localhost) by hydrogen.leitl.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g89DRJu05727; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:27:20 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: hydrogen.leitl.org: eugen owned process doing -bs
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
To: Chris Haun <chris@noskillz.com>
Cc: CDale <cdale@techmonkeys.net>, Tom <tomwhore@slack.net>,
	Gordon Mohr <gojomo@usa.net>, <fork@xent.com>
Subject: Re: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209090750320.23413-100000@isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net>
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209091524050.32400-100000@hydrogen.leitl.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:27:19 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.4 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,USER_AGENT_PINE,
	      WEIRD_PORT,X_AUTH_WARNING
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Chris Haun wrote:

> ok i read back, thats not a typo, you mean three thousand lovers.
> where do you get your data? It seems very unlikely, but if you have 
> supporting evidence i'd like to see it.

I haven't seen any official data on the web (the high-ranking hits are 
overrun by religious bigots), but there's some anecdotal evidence to be 
found in

	http://sunsite.berkeley.edu:2020/dynaweb/teiproj/oh/science/aidsnur2/@Generic__BookTextView/5406

(search for promiscuity). They mention 300 to 500 partners a year. 
(Anecdotally. This is not a statistic). They also mention that this was 
specific to gay males. Lesbians don't dig promiscuity in that degree.


