From: rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net  Mon Sep 23 22:46:13 2002
Return-Path: <rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8151516F17
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:46:12 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:46:12 +0100 (IST)
Received: from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8NHvrC28415 for
    <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:57:53 +0100
Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by egwn.net
    (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g8NHk2f18832; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 19:46:02
    +0200
Received: from interlize.com.br (interlize.com.br [200.244.92.2] (may be
    forged)) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g8NHibf12369 for
    <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 19:44:38 +0200
Received: from [10.0.0.3] [200.173.221.24] by interlize.com.br
    [200.244.92.2] with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v5.0.5.R) for
    <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:43:47 -0300
Subject: Re: Should mplayer be build with Win32 codecs?
From: Ricardo Mota <ricardo@mdbcomunicacao.com.br>
To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
In-Reply-To: <20020920181118.A17344@bonzo.nirvana>
References: <20020608213903.GA26452@krabat.physik.fu-berlin.de>
    <20020920181118.A17344@bonzo.nirvana>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8.99
Message-Id: <1032802765.9035.17.camel@Ricardo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Lookup-Warning: reverse lookup on original sender failed
X-Mdremoteip: 200.173.221.24
X-Return-Path: ricardo@mdbcomunicacao.com.br
X-Mdaemon-Deliver-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
X-Reply-To: ricardo@mdbcomunicacao.com.br
List-Help: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist-request@freshrpms.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list <rpm-zzzlist.freshrpms.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/rpm-zzzlist/>
X-Original-Date: 23 Sep 2002 14:38:44 -0300
Date: 23 Sep 2002 14:38:44 -0300
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 



Hi,

First you have to get the win32 files !!!
then , you configure using  --enable_win32 

On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 13:11, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> has anyone an answer for me? The mplayer documentation still suggests to use
> them for x86 architectures.
> 
> Thanks. :)
> 
> Regards, Axel.
> 
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 11:39:03PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > Are there perhaps licensing issues, which forbid such a practice? Or any other
> > reasons?
> > 
> > The reason I ask is that I have seen performance and also some feature
> > differences (fullscreen w/o keeping aspect ratio, visual artifacts on NVIDIA)
> > comparing with or without the Win32 codecs. The mplayer authors seem to
> > recommend using them for x86 architectures.
> > 
> > Beware, I am no mplayer/codecs/whatever expert, I may be totally lost ...
> 
> -- 
> Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
> http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
> 



_______________________________________________
RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list


