From: fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Sep  2 16:22:33 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F7644157
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 11:22:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 02 Sep 2002 16:22:05 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g827KoZ23723 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Mon, 2 Sep 2002 08:20:51 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 1FA91294185; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 00:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38])
    by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B663294099 for <FoRK@xent.com>;
    Mon,  2 Sep 2002 00:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Intellistation ([66.31.2.27]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com
    (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id
    <20020902071920.PLEQ12451.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@Intellistation> for
    <FoRK@xent.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 07:19:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Eirikur Hallgrimsson <eh@mad.scientist.com>
Organization: Electric Brain
To: FoRK <FoRK@xent.com>
Subject: Re: Java is for kiddies
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1
References: <NCBBJMBPOKEEKDAILFNGGEBDFEAA.rbfar@ebuilt.com>
In-Reply-To: <NCBBJMBPOKEEKDAILFNGGEBDFEAA.rbfar@ebuilt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <200209020319.13260.eh@mad.scientist.com>
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 03:19:13 -0400
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=7.0
	tests=FUDGE_MULTIHOP_RELAY,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      NOSPAM_INC,RCVD_IN_MULTIHOP_DSBL,RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL,
	      REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL
	version=2.40-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sunday 01 September 2002 08:43 pm, Reza B'Far (eBuilt) wrote:
> 3.  Java is not just a programming language!

The astounding thing about java is that despite all of the many significant 
points in its favor, it still manages to suck, and break across JVMs.

I was really looking forward to being able to use a better language like 
java and get it compiled to real platform-specific binaries via the GNU 
compiler collection.   But this seems to have never really gotten anywhere 
because it would require porting or reimplementing libraries, which are 
probably not source-available or tolerably licenced.   When I looked at 
what I had to do to gcc and link "hello world," I lost interest.

Who the hell is writing the runtimes, anyway?   Why are Perl/Python/Ruby 
more reliable?   In a world where the Macs all ran emulated 68K code 
utterly reliably, it's just hard to accept that there can't be a single 
portable JVM that just works.

My opinion is biased because of the disgraceful state of non-Windoze 
browser java implementations.

Eirikur




