From: fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Oct  7 22:40:45 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238AF16F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  7 Oct 2002 22:40:45 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 07 Oct 2002 22:40:45 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g97L3ZK16898 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Mon, 7 Oct 2002 22:03:36 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 3664D2940D8; Mon,  7 Oct 2002 14:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from mail.evergo.net (unknown [206.191.151.2]) by xent.com
    (Postfix) with SMTP id E8F6D2940A1 for <Fork@xent.com>; Mon,
    7 Oct 2002 14:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 10982 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2002 21:02:27 -0000
Received: from dsl.206.191.151.102.evergo.net (HELO JMHALL)
    (206.191.151.102) by mail.evergo.net with SMTP; 7 Oct 2002 21:02:27 -0000
Reply-To: <johnhall@evergo.net>
From: "John Hall" <johnhall@evergo.net>
To: <Fork@xent.com>
Subject: RE: The absurdities of life.
Message-Id: <000001c26e44$d8780150$0200a8c0@JMHALL>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <3283394680.20021007145936@magnesium.net>
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:02:28 -0700
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-17.0 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_00_10
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

They are legally required to do that.  I got a similar check because an
insurance company didn't pay a claim quickly enough.  It might have been
$.02.

Although they spent lots more than $.33 to mail you the check, the
alternative seems to be to keep the money.  Do you really want companies
to have a financial incentive to over-bill you 'just a bit' so they
could keep it?  For a company with millions of customers, $.33/customer
starts adding up.






> From: fork-admin@xent.com [mailto:fork-admin@xent.com] On Behalf Of
> bitbitch@magnesium.net

> So I get a check from Pac Bell today (SBC as they're called now).
> Turns out, they went to the trouble of printing out, signing, sealing
> and stamping a check just to refund me for a whole $0.33.
> 
> They easily spent more than this just getting the materials together.
> Why the hell do companies bother to do this crap?  I mean, isn't there
> a bottom line in terms of cost effectiveness?  I don't think I missed
> the .33, but I sure as hell would have appreciated lower rates in lieu
> of being returned pennies.
> 
> I'm truly stuck on this though.  I don't know whether to frame the
> check, burn it, or cash it in.  Maybe I should find a way to return to
> sender, so they have to spend -more- money on giving me my .33 dues.
> 
> 
> Does .33 even buy anything anymore?  Funny bit of it, is I couldn't
> even make a phone call these days.
> 
> *boggled*
> BB.
> 
> --
> Best regards,
>  bitbitch                          mailto:bitbitch@magnesium.net



