From: rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net  Mon Sep  9 18:03:05 2002
Return-Path: <rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1BF16EFC
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  9 Sep 2002 18:03:04 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 18:03:04 +0100 (IST)
Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (auth02.nl.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g16FHb805692 for
    <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 15:17:37 GMT
Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    auth02.nl.egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g16FFAt14887;
    Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:15:10 +0100
Received: from python (gw01.es3.egwn.net [212.9.66.13]) (authenticated) by
    auth02.nl.egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g16FEvt14871 for
    <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:14:57 +0100
From: Matthias Saou <matthias@egwn.net>
To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
Subject: Re: Apt problems
Message-Id: <20020206161427.494ecf0b.matthias@egwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20020206163018.C17717@cs.helsinki.fi>
References: <20020206162953.C10950@pihlaja.kotilo>
    <20020206163018.C17717@cs.helsinki.fi>
Organization: Electronic Group Interactive
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.0claws5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux)
Reply-BY: Tue, 24 Jul 2000 19:02:00 +1000
X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux power!
X-Message-Flag: Try using a real operating system : GNU/Linux power!
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
List-Help: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist-request@freshrpms.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list <rpm-zzzlist.freshrpms.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/rpm-zzzlist/>
X-Original-Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:14:27 +0100
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:14:27 +0100
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.2 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

Once upon a time, Harri wrote :

> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 04:29:53PM +0200, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> > Two issues:
> > 
> > --<snip>--
> > Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >   openssh: Depends: openssl (= 0.9.5a) but 0.9.6b-8 is installed
> >   php-pgsql: Depends: postgresql but it is not installed
> >              Depends: libpq.so.2
> > E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f.
> > --</snip>--
> > 
> > 1. I have the following openssl packages installed:
> > 
> > --<snip>--
> > openssl-perl-0.9.6b-8
> > openssl-0.9.6b-8
> > openssl095a-0.9.5a-11
> > openssl-devel-0.9.6b-8
> > --</snip>--
> > 
> > The openssl095a package should provide the openssl-0.9.5a compatibility
> > but apt doesn't think so? 
> 
> I believe that's just a matter of string parsing. If someone were to fix
> the openssh package, removing the explicit Requires:, I believe the
> automagic binary handler would figure the right libraries to use and
> install. I haven't met an openssh like that and in worst case I've had 3
> different openssl libraries (WTF can't they just bump a major version if
> it's incompatible?!?).

Strange... all my openssh packages don't explicitly requires a version of
openssl. What version of openssh do you have? Is it an official Red Hat
package? I suppose it isn't, and using Red Hat's rpms will solve your
problem.

What you need to know for openssl is :
0.9.5b is libcrypto.so.0 and libssl.so.0
0.9.6  is libcrypto.so.1 and libssl.so.1
0.9.6b is libcrypto.so.2 and libssl.so.2

Now in all Red Hat packages I've seen so far, the only dependency is on
those files and not on "openssl = version".

Matthias

-- 
Matthias Saou                                World Trade Center
-------------                                Edificio Norte 4 Planta
System and Network Engineer                  08039 Barcelona, Spain
Electronic Group Interactive                 Phone : +34 936 00 23 23

_______________________________________________
RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

