From: fork-admin@xent.com  Fri Sep 13 13:37:25 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B297916F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:37:24 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:37:24 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8CKYhC14626 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Thu, 12 Sep 2002 21:34:46 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 0D3A82940E5; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from Boron.MeepZor.Com (i.meepzor.com [204.146.167.214]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38FF29409A for <fork@xent.com>;
    Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sashimi (dmz-firewall [206.199.198.4]) by Boron.MeepZor.Com
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8CKXVO32620 for <fork@xent.com>;
    Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:33:31 -0400
From: "Bill Stoddard" <bill@wstoddard.com>
To: "Fork@Xent.Com" <fork@example.com>
Subject: RE: dylsexics of the wrold, untie!
Message-Id: <JHEPKCEMGPKFFDHHDDKDAEIOFFAA.bill@wstoddard.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <1031860743.14237.42.camel@avalon>
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: Normal
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:32:52 -0400
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL,USER_AGENT_OUTLOOK
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

> If the text recognition algorithm/architecture humans use is anything
> like the algorithm/structure we've been working with, the reason the
> first letter (and to a lesser extent, the last letter) is important is
> that without it the text pattern recognition problem is exponentially
> more difficult (from a theoretical standpoint anyway) and has to be
> resolved using deeper abstraction analysis.  The middle letters are far
> less important and computationally much easier to resolve correctly.

I think keeping the number of middle letters consistent with the correct
spelling is important.  Would be interesting to see if this same effect is
applicable to written forms of other languages, maybe even Japanese romongi.

Bill


