From: razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Wed Oct  9 18:17:52 2002
Return-Path: <razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC8E16F16
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed,  9 Oct 2002 18:17:52 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:17:52 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g99FUXK08812 for <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:30:33 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17zIlp-0002b9-00; Wed,
    09 Oct 2002 08:29:09 -0700
Received: from [207.106.111.252] (helo=digby.pffcu.org) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
    17zIlS-00088A-00 for <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Wed,
    09 Oct 2002 08:28:46 -0700
Received: from tasker.pffcu.org ([200.1.1.57]) by digby.pffcu.org with
    SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id
    4GL6DP4L; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:28:46 -0400
Received: from localhost (sc@localhost) by tasker.pffcu.org
    (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g99FRdI04483; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:27:39 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: tasker.pffcu.org: sc owned process doing -bs
From: Samuel Checker <sc@pffcu.org>
To: Brian Fahrlander <kilroy@kamakiriad.com>
Cc: <razor-users@example.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Razor and Pine
In-Reply-To: <20021009101127.7bc322fa.kilroy@kamakiriad.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210091125530.4480-100000@tasker.pffcu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:razor-users-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:razor-users@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users>,
    <mailto:razor-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <razor-users.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users>,
    <mailto:razor-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchives/forum.php?forum=razor-users>
X-Original-Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:27:39 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:27:39 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_00_10,T_NONSENSE_FROM_10_20,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_20_30,T_NONSENSE_FROM_30_40,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_40_50,T_NONSENSE_FROM_50_60,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_60_70,T_NONSENSE_FROM_70_80,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_80_90,T_NONSENSE_FROM_90_91,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_91_92,T_NONSENSE_FROM_92_93,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_93_94,T_NONSENSE_FROM_94_95,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_95_96,T_NONSENSE_FROM_96_97,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_97_98,T_NONSENSE_FROM_98_99,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_99_100,USER_AGENT_PINE,X_AUTH_WARNING
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Brian Fahrlander wrote:

> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:15:03 -0400 (EDT), Samuel Checker <sc@pffcu.org> wrote:
>
> > I've been testing Razor, invoked from sendmail/procmail and so far it
> > seems pretty copacetic. Last night's spam to the list provided a good test
> > - the spam itself as well as several of the responses were flagged, as
> > other list members reported.
> >
>
>     Are you using Spamassassin on the input side?  I've just changed my sendmail installation and am looking for the 'proper' way to pass it through there, systemwide, before accepting it and sending it to the users.  It's kinda problematic to set up procmail scripts for every user, when the user's home directories are NFS mounted....and the source is on my own machine, on which I try new things. (And it's the only machine with the drivespace...)
>

I've not used Spamassassin on the KISS principle. I just have procmail
adding an X-header and optionally modifying the Subject if razor-check
comes back positive.

-- 
sc



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users


