From: fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Sep  9 19:27:33 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB1516EFC
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  9 Sep 2002 19:27:33 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:27:33 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g89EDJC18586 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:13:19 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 396C72942BB; Mon,  9 Sep 2002 07:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from venus.phpwebhosting.com (venus.phpwebhosting.com
    [64.29.16.27]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FCFA2940EC for
    <fork@xent.com>; Mon,  9 Sep 2002 07:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 19477 invoked by uid 508); 9 Sep 2002 14:12:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hydrogen.leitl.org) (217.80.40.112) by
    venus.phpwebhosting.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 14:12:38 -0000
Received: from localhost (eugen@localhost) by hydrogen.leitl.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g89ECa407063; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:12:36 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: hydrogen.leitl.org: eugen owned process doing -bs
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
To: <bitbitch@magnesium.net>
Cc: <fork@example.com>
Subject: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
In-Reply-To: <10770315074.20020909094137@magnesium.net>
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209091553450.32400-100000@hydrogen.leitl.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:12:36 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.2 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT_PINE,
	      X_AUTH_WARNING
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 bitbitch@magnesium.net wrote:

> So Eugen, how many of your homo friends have -had- 3k lovers?

Just one. Not everybody does that. Most of them are now dead, anyway.
 
> Do you know anyone, outside of meybee Wilt Chamberlin and a few of the
> gang-bang porn queens who -have- had even 1.5k lovers?

Yes. Notice that I've specifically excluded sex industry. That be 
cheating.
 
> Eegads, if you're hypothesizing numbers like -that- Eugen, you at
> least owe it to FoRK to back that shit up.

Ain't done no hypothesizing. Anecdotal evidence'R'Us. Couldn't you just
Google, or something?
 
> Otherwise we're liable to assume rampant unfounded homophobia and that
> would just be a lose.

Yeah, I'm a gay Jew Nazi Muslim who's also a lead character on Kaz's
underworld. Can we go on with the programme now?
 
> Just a quick assumption here.   I'm not a math geek or anything, but
> assuming 1 lover every day, that would be like at least one lover
> everyday for 8 years and some change.   I don't know about you, but
> very very few of us are -that- lucky (or even close to that lucky)

Which was my point. Gurls don't do hyperpromiscuity as a life style. It's
interesting that you're launching into a diatribe, and threaten using
instant argument (just add hominem) instead of assuming I might be not
just pulling this whole thing out my nether orifice.

> and after awhile, even the sexaholics get bored and have to mingle
> something new into their weekends.   You really are assumiing that the
> homosexual population is a) that large in a given area (The meccas

You ever been to San Francisco?

> might qualify, but try finding that kind of homosexual population in
> say, Tulsa, Oklahoma or Manchester, NH (Tho Manchester does have quite

Yeah, I think it could be also difficult finding a gay bathhouse in Thule,
Greenland. Or parts of central Africa. To think of it, both Oort and 
Kuiper belts are utterly devoid of gay people as well. Isn't this 
remarkable?

> a few nifty gaybars, but thats a different story)  b) that bored/sex
> obsessed/recreationally free to pursue sex that often, with that many
> partners or that they'd even WANT that many partners.

This doesn't happen because it couldn't happen. No one would want to. 
Because you feel that way. Correct?

> Qualify yourself, or at least lower your outrageous numbers.

I didn't expect so much reflexive knee-jerking on this list.


