From: spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 29 11:06:03 2002
Return-Path: <spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5804843F99
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 06:04:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:04:53 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7SKb5Z09484 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 21:37:06 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17k9Wq-0002UP-00; Wed,
    28 Aug 2002 13:35:04 -0700
Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com ([204.127.198.38]) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
    17k9WP-0006SE-00 for <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>;
    Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:34:37 -0700
Received: from localhost ([12.229.66.144]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com
    (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id
    <20020828203427.CHGD14185.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@localhost> for
    <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:34:27 +0000
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] O.T. Habeus -- Why?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482)
From: Brian McNett <bmcnett@radparker.com>
To: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <1030560510.17408.TMDA@omega.paradigm-omega.net>
Message-Id: <829DCAD0-BAC5-11D6-AD60-003065C182B0@radparker.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482)
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
    <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
    <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=spamassassin-talk>
X-Original-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:34:11 -0700
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:34:11 -0700
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.3 required=7.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FUDGE_MULTIHOP_RELAY,IN_REP_TO,
	      KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,RCVD_IN_MULTIHOP_DSBL,
	      RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,
	      USER_AGENT_APPLEMAIL
	version=2.40-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 


On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 11:48  AM, Robin Lynn Frank wrote:

> If I were a spammer, I'd simply set up a server, send out my 
> spam with the
> Habeus headers and continue till I was reasonably certain I'd 
> been reported.
> Then I'd simply reconfigure the server and reconnect to a 
> different IP.  As
> long as no one can establish my connection to the web sites my spam is
> directing people to, I'm home free.

Uh... the reason is simple. Habeas runs something called the 
"Habeas Infringers List", and if you use their trademark without 
their permission, you'll end up on it.  Then, when you send spam 
with the misappropriated header, users of SA (2.40 supports 
this) will tag your mail as spam, rather than let it through. 
This may be done independantly of your IP address, so be 
prepared to constantly change domain names, and move your 
servers as fast as you send spam.

Also, that little haiku is a copyrighted work, so not only CAN 
Habeas sue, they MUST sue to protect their copyright. And since 
it's a trademark as well, that's a double-whammy. Habeas has 
some pretty high-powered legal people, who will gladly go to 
town on violators.

The whole point here is to give them the legal leverage they 
need to put spammers out of business, and not only block mail 
from them, but allow through the things that really AREN'T spam.

--B



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing 
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! 
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

