From: fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Aug 26 21:57:50 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCAE43F99
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:57:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:57:49 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7QKsKZ09118 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:54:21 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 3DEFE2941C6; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from plato.einstein (unknown [65.170.226.173]) by xent.com
    (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CBF294099 for <fork@xent.com>; Tue,
    20 Aug 2002 23:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RSHAVELL ([63.101.39.6]) by plato.einstein with Microsoft
    SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.3779); Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:36:30 -0700
From: "Rob Shavell" <rob@mobiusvc.com>
To: "'Eugen Leitl'" <eugen@leitl.org>,
	"'Mike Masnick'" <mike@techdirt.com>,
	"'Joseph S. Barrera III'" <joe@barrera.org>,
	"'Ian Andrew Bell'" <fork@ianbell.com>
Cc: <fork@example.com>
Subject: RE: sprint delivers the next big thing??
Message-Id: <00dc01c248dd$0c740ea0$6765010a@einstein>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0208191032320.16603-100000@hydrogen.leitl.org>
X-Originalarrivaltime: 21 Aug 2002 06:36:30.0964 (UTC) FILETIME=[15BF8340:01C248DD]
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:36:13 -0700
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.6 required=7.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_OUTLOOK
	version=2.40-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

thx for the thoughts gentlemen (yes as someone said i use terms loosely) -

more than cool --->

quality: snobs only care about mpixels. this is about communications.  the
general public cares about speed not quality.  how is akamai doing these
days? not to mention any other QOS businesses that come to mind.

implementation: point about hooking to usb, wires, etc. AGREE 100%. these
implementations are super clunky, attachable camera needs to be integrated a
la nokia model.  basically useless until better handsets are released i
think.

adoption: ian brought up the 'fax' problem.  brilliant thing is, this is far
more personal than faxes so can be justified more easily and marketed in
family packs etc. but yes, the usual rules apply as MMS phones have network
efx.

content: who cares about content?  that no one can think of 'useful' content
is always the business persons mistake. the content is the users
communications.  its anything and everything.  avg person could easily send
half dozen pics to a dozen people a day.  mainly humorous i'd guess. who
cares if content is trivial in nature. picture speaks a thousand words.

display: why are dig camera displays better than cell phones?  does anyone
know who makes these small displays and what the trends are around them?

misc ramblings: i suppose you skeptical forkers would have said the same
thing about '1 hour photo' processing.  trivial, who needs it, i get better
resultion elswhere.  and yet, it had great decentralizing impact - the plant
had to be downsized and pushed to the retail operation - the digital camera,
and finally the integrated digital camera phone brings this cycle of
decentralization in photography to a logical conclusion (which will put the
photo giants to bed) and change the world in a meaningful way.  also, SMS
didn't take off because its easy, it took off because it costs less.  its
greatly ironic the carriers often trumpet the 'profitabilty' of their SMS
traffic over others because of its ratio of cost to bandwidth.  in reality,
SMS cannibilizes the voice rev's they bought their networks to handle.

ps:  it is relatively amusing that one 'low resolution' complaint dropped
just after Joe watched a CARTOON on his television..

You're right. Or at least, I don't. I saw an advert for it on TV last
night (can't miss Futurama :-) and I thought, "boy, that's dumb."
If I wanted to share pictures with someone, I'd email them to them,
where they could see them on a 1024x or 1600x display, instead of

rob


-----Original Message-----
From: Eugen Leitl [mailto:eugen@leitl.org]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 1:34 AM
To: Rob Shavell
Cc: fork@example.com
Subject: Re: sprint delivers the next big thing??


On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Rob Shavell wrote:

> down in the tech world than mobile visual communications.. and yet no one
> seems to give much of a damn that right now that 2 persons can take photos
> and share them instantly across space.  this is one of the biggest - and

The word "trivial" comes to mind.

> last - fundamental changes in human communications.  will be as big as the
> browser.

Remote realtime streaming video is neat, but sharing pictures? You invoke
big words rather readily.

http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork

