From: exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com  Wed Oct  2 11:43:19 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-workers-admin@example.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643F816F16
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed,  2 Oct 2002 11:43:19 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 02 Oct 2002 11:43:19 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g924NYK25468 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 05:23:34 +0100
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795853F0FE; Wed,  2 Oct 2002
    00:24:10 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.example.com
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D0B3FD84
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Wed,  2 Oct 2002 00:22:21 -0400
    (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g924MLv11335 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 2 Oct 2002
    00:22:21 -0400
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g924MLf11331 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 00:22:21 -0400
Received: from dimebox.bmc.com (adsl-66-140-152-233.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net
    [66.140.152.233]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id
    g9243Xi19307 for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 00:03:34 -0400
Received: by dimebox.bmc.com (Postfix, from userid 1205) id E13E437EA9;
    Tue,  1 Oct 2002 23:22:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dimebox.bmc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dimebox.bmc.com
    (Postfix) with ESMTP id C189837EA6 for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>;
    Tue,  1 Oct 2002 23:22:19 -0500 (CDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 cvs 10/01/2002 with nmh-1.0.4
To: exmh-workers@example.com
Subject: Bindings problem with current CVS code
From: Hal DeVore <haldevore@acm.org>
X-Image-Url: http://www.geocities.com/hal_devore_ii/haleye48.gif
Message-Id: <30957.1033532534@dimebox.bmc.com>
X-Loop: exmh-workers@example.com
Sender: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-workers-request@example.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-workers@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers <exmh-workers.example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-workers/>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 23:22:14 -0500
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.8 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,X_LOOP
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

I've had this binding in my ~/.exmh/exmhbindings for years:

set {bindings(key,Flist_FindUnseen 1 ; Inc_PresortFinish)} <Key-f>

After updating to the current code in CVS I get "bad key f" when 
I hit the "f" key.  I can open the Bindings... Commands window 
and define the binding.  It then works until I restart exmh.

I suspect a parsing problem/change.  I'll try to look into this 
tomorrow unless someone knows where the problem might be.

--Hal






_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
Exmh-workers@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers


