From: fork-admin@xent.com  Wed Aug 28 18:17:25 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7157043F99
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:17:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:17:25 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7SHBYZ02287 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:11:34 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 95A6A294224; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from argote.ch (argote.ch [80.65.224.17]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id DEE3229421D for <fork@xent.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:06:49
    -0700 (PDT)
Received: by argote.ch (Postfix, from userid 500) id B53E9C44D;
    Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:59:37 +0200 (CEST)
To: fork@example.com
Subject: Re: Java is for kiddies
Message-Id: <20020828165937.B53E9C44D@argote.ch>
From: harley@argote.ch (Robert Harley)
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:59:37 +0200 (CEST)
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=7.0
	tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
	version=2.40-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

GLM wrote:
>And a Java program, due to the extensive class libraries, will weigh
>in at 10% the number of lines of the equivalent C program.  QED.

Quod erat not demonstrandum at all.

There are massive amounts of libraries for C, Fortran and so on.
To pick an obvious example., if you want to do linear algebra, then
Java isn't a serious candidate at all.

Furthermore, plenty of bugs occur in the libraries too, at a lower
rate due to more users having been bitten by them, but they are much
harder for you to fix than in your own code.

Why do so many people outside of Sun's marketing department consider
Java to be "Write Once, Debug Everywhere" ?

R

