From: tony@svanstrom.com  Wed Aug 28 10:56:41 2002
Return-Path: <tony@svanstrom.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5927743F9B
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 05:56:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:56:37 +0100 (IST)
Received: from moon.campus.luth.se (root@moon.campus.luth.se
    [130.240.202.158]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7RJIqZ22179 for <jm@jmason.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:18:52 +0100
Received: from moon.campus.luth.se (tony@moon.campus.luth.se
    [130.240.202.158]) by moon.campus.luth.se (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id
    g7RJJ2Mg007856; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:19:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from
    tony@svanstrom.com)
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:19:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Tony L. Svanstrom" <tony@svanstrom.com>
X-X-Sender: tony@moon.campus.luth.se
To: "Jason R. Mastaler" <jason-exp-1031164464.7f11b3@mastaler.com>
Cc: Justin Mason <yyyy@example.com>,
	<spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>, <tmda-users@tmda.net>
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: patent on TMDA-like system
In-Reply-To: <hhvg5wkv68.fsf@hrothgar.la.mastaler.com>
Message-Id: <20020827211008.Y6871-100000@moon.campus.luth.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=7.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.40-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 the voices made Jason R. Mastaler write:

> jm@jmason.org (Justin Mason) writes:
>
> > Sounds a lot like TMDA to me. :( Filing date is July 26, 2001,
> > granted May 16, 2002.
> >
> > TMDAers, have you seen this before?
>
> No, but thanks for pointing it out.
>
> > I'd presume TMDA is prior art, but still, it could be troublesome...
>
> Yup.  TMDA's core functionality was fully established before even the
> filing date.
>
> Anyone with experience in this area have a recommendation on whether
> this should be pursued or not?

 If you think you can survive it, please fight... When I found that patent I
found others that were just common sense, things that any geek could implement
with his script/shell-language of choice; and it's time for someone to get the
medias attention on what's going on.
 Basically this is the new wave of "namenappers"; it used to be domainnames,
not it's all the basic general ideas they can think off/find on the web that
they're patenting.


	/Tony
-- 
# Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! #
# Genom kunskap mot frihet! =*= (c) 1999-2002 tony@svanstrom.com =*= #

     perl -e'print$_{$_} for sort%_=`lynx -dump svanstrom.com/t`'


