From: exmh-users-admin@redhat.com  Tue Sep 10 15:47:05 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-users-admin@example.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D561F16F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:47:04 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:47:04 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8AETfC02512 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:29:45 +0100
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BBD3EBDE; Tue, 10 Sep 2002
    10:30:03 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-users@listman.example.com
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C643EAF8
    for <exmh-users@listman.redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:29:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g8AETUC14161 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Tue, 10 Sep 2002
    10:29:30 -0400
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8AETUm14157 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:29:30 -0400
Received: from whatexit.org (postfix@whatexit.org [64.7.3.122]) by
    mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8AED9v01013 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:13:09 -0400
Received: from joisey.whatexit.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whatexit.org
    (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DF2A7 for <exmh-users@redhat.com>;
    Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:29:26 -0400 (EDT)
To: exmh-users@example.com
Subject: Re: Sorting
From: Tom Reingold <noglider@pobox.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
X-Uri: http://whatexit.org/~tommy
X-Image-Url: http://whatexit.org/~tommy/zombie.gif
In-Reply-To: Message from J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu> of Tue,
    10 Sep 2002 01:20:56 PDT <20020909193637.590BBB1@whatexit.org>
    <29945.1031646056@kanga.nu>
Message-Id: <20020910142926.C5DF2A7@whatexit.org>
X-Loop: exmh-users@example.com
Sender: exmh-users-admin@example.com
Errors-To: exmh-users-admin@example.com
X-Beenthere: exmh-users@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: exmh-users@example.com
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-users-request@example.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-users@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
    <mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users <exmh-users.example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
    <mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-users/>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:29:26 -0400
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.4 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_LOOP
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 


On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 01:20:56 PDT,
	J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu> wrote:

> On Mon, 09 Sep 2002 15:36:37 -0400 
> Tom Reingold <noglider@pobox.com> wrote:
> 
> > At work, I have to use Outlook.  Ick.  I hate it.  
> 
> Ahh.  At work we fire people who use Outlook (Literally true: They get
> escorted to the door, their badge confiscated, and told to return the
> next day to collect their office contents).

Why?  What threat does Outlook pose to your organization?

> > But it does a few things right.  Like making indices for each folder,
> > and not just by date, but also by sender, message size, subject.  So I
> > can sort by any column instantly.
> 
> Have you looked into using a custom sequences file?

More detail please?  I do use sequences, so I'm familiar with their
use, but how can I make indices with them, and how can I keep them
up to date?

> > And mime handling is pretty bad compared with modern mailers.
> 
> The only thing I actually miss in that regard is support for S/MIME.

You're probably running exmh on a local machine.  I'm running it on
a very remote machine.  In this scenario, the mime handling is weak.



_______________________________________________
Exmh-users mailing list
Exmh-users@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users


