From: fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Sep 30 17:56:33 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD1516F1F
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:54:01 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:54:01 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8UErJK03292 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:53:20 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 6CDF32940C8; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 07:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (mta7.pltn13.pbi.net [64.164.98.8]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C6529409E for <Fork@xent.com>;
    Mon, 30 Sep 2002 07:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from endeavors.com ([66.126.120.174]) by mta7.pltn13.pbi.net
    (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May  7 2001)) with ESMTP id
    <0H3900BC9ANJDV@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> for Fork@xent.com; Mon,
    30 Sep 2002 07:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gregory Alan Bolcer <gbolcer@endeavors.com>
Subject: Re: A moment of silence for the First Amendment (fwd)
To: Fork@xent.com
Message-Id: <3D9862DE.1AE7525D@endeavors.com>
Organization: Endeavors Technology, Inc.
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; IRIX 6.5 IP32)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: en, pdf
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209291337100.4723-100000@mlug.missouri.edu>
    <3D9859B9.3A7F80C2@endeavors.com> <3D986033.2060903@permafrost.net>
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 07:42:38 -0700
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,RCVD_IN_MULTIHOP_DSBL,
	      RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
	      T_URI_COUNT_0_1,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_XM,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

Owen Byrne wrote:

> What a load of crap. Politics are somehow more muddy now?  I'd say that
> its considerably
> clearer - the vast majority of people feel disenfranchised, and the
> common practice of
> putting protestors in boxes is done usually to hide them from TV
> cameras, visiting dignitaries,
> etc, further exacerbating those feelings.
> "Unpeaceably disrupting political rallies" is now usually done by police
> with riot gear and pepper spray.
> 
> We had a good one here a month or so ago - a few people peaceably
> strayed from the permit area,
> which was nearly a mile from the site of the meeting of finance
> ministers held here (the motorcade drove
> by it for about 10 seconds), and were immediately gassed,  beaten and
> arrested. Not very muddied at all.


What does that exactly have to do with the statement that
distruption of peacable political assembly has become
a common practice disruption tool?  It's an observation
not a judgement, comment, approval.  You've focused on the
word "muddy" to use it in a different context than the one
I posted.

Maybe the distinction I was trying to make was too subtle and
I was trying to be too clever with my writing this morning.
Let me summarize the important parts of my post for you: I
have a premise that there is a difference between free and protected
speech and action.  I think O'Neill on his soapbox doesn't
understand the distinction.

All better?  

Greg


