From: exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com  Mon Aug 26 19:03:29 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-workers-admin@example.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD6043F99
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:03:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:03:29 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7QI4SZ03731 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:04:32 +0100
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE003F362; Mon, 26 Aug 2002
    14:04:26 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.example.com
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5FB3F407
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:01:02 -0400
    (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g7QI0wM26240 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 26 Aug 2002
    14:00:58 -0400
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7QI0wY26236 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:00:58 -0400
Received: from milou.dyndns.org (h189n1fls22o974.telia.com
    [213.64.79.189]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id
    g7QHk5l18771 for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:46:05
    -0400
Received: by milou.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 913C73F05;
    Mon, 26 Aug 2002 20:00:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from tippex.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    milou.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCE73F04 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 20:00:41 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5_20020826 01/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: exmh-workers@example.com
Subject: Exmh && speed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Anders Eriksson <aeriksson@fastmail.fm>
Message-Id: <20020826180041.913C73F05@milou.dyndns.org>
X-Loop: exmh-workers@example.com
Sender: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-workers-request@example.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-workers@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers <exmh-workers.example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-workers/>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 20:00:36 +0200
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=7.0
	tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_LOOP
	version=2.40-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 


lately I've got the feeling that exmh is getting slower and slower. I 
just decided to check that vs. reality, and yes, speed has left the 
scene somewhere between the release of 2.5 and now.

I checked on a number of small messages in a big folder (~10000 
msgs). The delay of the Next button has increased considerably:

2.5-release: 350-450 msec
latest cvs: 1000-12000 msec

Frankly I think this is getting close to non-acceptable since the 
user settings hasn't changed.

Anybody have any ideas where performance disappeared?

/Anders



_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
Exmh-workers@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers

