From: quinlan@pathname.com  Wed Aug 28 10:45:34 2002
Return-Path: <quinlan@pathname.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F6F4415B
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 05:44:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:44:48 +0100 (IST)
Received: from proton.pathname.com
    (adsl-216-103-211-240.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.103.211.240]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7RLjPZ27063 for
    <jm@jmason.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 22:45:25 +0100
Received: from quinlan by proton.pathname.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1
    (Debian)) id 17jo9X-00072t-00; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:45:35 -0700
To: yyyy@example.com (Justin Mason)
Cc: Matt Sergeant <msergeant@startechgroup.co.uk>,
	spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [SAdev] SpamAssassin POP3 proxy
References: <20020827121720.1A37C43F99@phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com>
From: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@pathname.com>
Date: 27 Aug 2002 14:45:35 -0700
In-Reply-To: yyyy@example.com's message of "Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:17:15 +0100"
Message-Id: <yf24rdgkmbk.fsf@proton.pathname.com>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=7.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.40-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

jm@jmason.org (Justin Mason) writes:

> Actually, I want to avoid that -- I've already removed spamproxyd
> from the distro for 2.40. Here's why:
> 
> When they're in the distro, *we* have to support them -- which is
> not necessarily a good thing when we didn't write them in the first
> place, or when the coder in question may not *want* us to maintain
> them. :(

I would be in favor of creating new SpamAssassin CVS modules and
Bugzilla categories for other clients (provided there is sufficient
interest and a maintainer).

Dan

