From: fork-admin@xent.com  Fri Sep  6 11:42:37 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9946E16F78
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri,  6 Sep 2002 11:39:58 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:39:58 +0100 (IST)
Received: from webnote.net (mail.webnote.net [193.120.211.219]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g869r6C29218 for
    <jm@jmason.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:53:06 +0100
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by webnote.net (8.9.3/8.9.3)
    with ESMTP id XAA19142 for <jm@jmason.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 23:58:05 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 515A5294174; Thu,  5 Sep 2002 11:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38])
    by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABDC2940AA for <FoRK@xent.com>;
    Thu,  5 Sep 2002 11:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Intellistation ([66.31.2.27]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com
    (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id
    <20020905183308.ZUIL1399.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@Intellistation> for
    <FoRK@xent.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 18:33:08 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Eirikur Hallgrimsson <eh@mad.scientist.com>
Organization: Electric Brain
To: FoRK <FoRK@xent.com>
Subject: Re: Ouch...
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209042158330.26056-100000@isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209042158330.26056-100000@isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <200209051432.42151.eh@mad.scientist.com>
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:32:42 -0400
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.6 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC,
	      RCVD_IN_MULTIHOP_DSBL,RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_KMAIL
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

On Wednesday 04 September 2002 10:59 pm, CDale wrote:
> Someone needs to tell the mayor about this:
> http://www.cb-2000.com/

"Chastity" technologies were doomed from the start, and I'll add chemical 
ones to the trash heap.  (Yeah, Cindy, these are decorative toys for the 
subculture, but....)  

Generally,someone is attempting to preserve a relationship with this 
nonsense, when quite plainly the the relationship is in a state where 
preserving it is of little value.  Hardware is of no real use save for 
playing the power-struggle game.   I don't want to see the future of this.
"Invisible Fence" for your mate.   "Must wear" location transponders and 
endocrine monitors.   More movies like "Minority Report."

It seems so automatic for people to reach for coercive solutions.   So 
surprizing given the low absolute effectiveness of coercion in the absense 
of overwhelming force advantage.

Eirikur




