From: rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net  Mon Sep  9 18:04:22 2002
Return-Path: <rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F7916EFC
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  9 Sep 2002 18:04:02 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 18:04:02 +0100 (IST)
Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (auth02.nl.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g16HMv811088 for
    <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 17:22:57 GMT
Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    auth02.nl.egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g16HM1t29814;
    Wed, 6 Feb 2002 18:22:01 +0100
Received: from fep02-app.kolumbus.fi (fep02-0.kolumbus.fi [193.229.0.44])
    by auth02.nl.egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g16HLIt29797 for
    <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 18:21:18 +0100
Received: from pihlaja.kotilo ([62.248.144.92]) by fep02-app.kolumbus.fi
    (InterMail vM.5.01.03.15 201-253-122-118-115-20011108) with ESMTP id
    <20020206172122.ZGD1068.fep02-app.kolumbus.fi@pihlaja.kotilo> for
    <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:21:22 +0200
Received: (from peter@localhost) by pihlaja.kotilo (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
    g16HiQH12752 for rpm-list@freshrpms.net; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:44:26 +0200
From: Peter Peltonen <pisara@iki.fi>
To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
Subject: Re: Apt problems
Message-Id: <20020206194426.F10950@pihlaja.kotilo>
References: <20020206162953.C10950@pihlaja.kotilo>
    <20020206163018.C17717@cs.helsinki.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20020206163018.C17717@cs.helsinki.fi>; from
    harri.haataja@cs.helsinki.fi on Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 04:30:18PM +0200
Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net
X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net
List-Help: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist-request@freshrpms.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list <rpm-zzzlist.freshrpms.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-zzzlist>,
    <mailto:rpm-list-request@freshrpms.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/rpm-zzzlist/>
X-Original-Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:44:26 +0200
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:44:26 +0200
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-17.6 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 04:30:18PM +0200, Harri Haataja wrote:
> I have a few such things (with jdk, imlib, kernel DRI version..
> something) and Ive just made dummy packages (with verbose warning
> attached ;) that explicitly provide those capabilities. (or claim to,
> that is).

Hm. One could do this with rpm's --justdb switch too, without having to 
make a dummy package, right?

I was wondering that this is a bit dangerous if there is a update for my 
software, as the dummy package might get updated with it overwriting the 
installation I've done from source... Not good.

Is there really no "--nodeps" kind of switch in apt-get? 

-- 
Peter


_______________________________________________
RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

