From: exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com  Wed Oct  2 15:59:26 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-workers-admin@example.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB09716F1A
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed,  2 Oct 2002 15:59:07 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 02 Oct 2002 15:59:07 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g92EngK13465 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:49:43 +0100
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A01C3F997; Wed,  2 Oct 2002
    10:50:15 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.example.com
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6527B3EB14
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Wed,  2 Oct 2002 10:49:39 -0400
    (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g92End532337 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 2 Oct 2002
    10:49:39 -0400
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g92Endf32333 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:49:39 -0400
Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu (turing-police.cc.vt.edu
    [128.173.14.107]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id
    g92EUmi07079 for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:30:48 -0400
Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    turing-police.cc.vt.edu (8.12.6.Beta1/8.12.6.Beta1) with ESMTP id
    g92EnPLw027736; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:49:25 -0400
Message-Id: <200210021449.g92EnPLw027736@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4+dev
To: "J. W. Ballantine" <jwb@homer.att.com>
Cc: exmh-workers@example.com
Subject: Re: A couple of nits...
In-Reply-To: Your message of
    "Wed, 02 Oct 2002 09:54:04 EDT."
    <200210021354.JAA13534@hera.homer.att.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
X-Url: http://black-ice.cc.vt.edu/~valdis/
X-Face-Viewer: See ftp://cs.indiana.edu/pub/faces/index.html to decode picture
X-Face: 34C9$Ewd2zeX+\!i1BA\j{ex+$/V'JBG#;3_noWWYPa"|,I#`R"{n@w>#:{)FXyiAS7(8t(
    ^*w5O*!8O9YTe[r{e%7(yVRb|qxsRYw`7J!`AM}m_SHaj}f8eb@d^L>BrX7iO[<!v4-0bVIpaxF#-)
    %9#a9h6JXI|T|8o6t\V?kGl]Q!1V]GtNliUtz:3},0"hkPeBuu%E,j(:\iOX-P,t7lRR#
References: <200210021354.JAA13534@hera.homer.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
    boundary="==_Exmh_-1581861840P";
    micalg=pgp-sha1;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Loop: exmh-workers@example.com
Sender: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-workers-request@example.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-workers@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers <exmh-workers.example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
    <mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-workers/>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 10:49:25 -0400
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NO_REAL_NAME,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,X_LOOP
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

--==_Exmh_-1581861840P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Wed, 02 Oct 2002 09:54:04 EDT, "J. W. Ballantine" <jwb@homer.att.com>  said:

> First, when I try and run exmh with wish from tk8.4.0 it seems to take
> forever to start, but with wish from tk8.a.4 it starts in a snap.

This sounds like something piggy in the 'flist' code - I'm seeing flist
in general taking 5-10 seconds.  Interesting that a different wish comes up
fast, there might be a borkedness in 8.4.

> Using the latest CVS, when I open exmh and the folder I'm in has unseen
> messages and I hit next, exmh changes to the next folder with unseen messages
> rather than to the first unseen in the current folder.

Hmm.. weirdness..

> Finally, when I reach the end of the messages in a folder and go on to
> the next unseen, exmh always goes back to inbox (which has no unseen
> messages) rather than the next folder with unseen messages.  (When I 
> goto next from inbox it does go where I would think it should go).

I've been seeing this as well - *usually* with inbox, but it's gotten
stuck on some other folders as well (I have procmail do rcvstore into folders
for me).
-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
				Virginia Tech


--==_Exmh_-1581861840P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQE9mwd0cC3lWbTT17ARAsOKAKCe3ziHYPQnWBGyUdYQzYurE1tguACfS9Ms
TUQI8ndQ8stuJqaWVGSAi4k=
=JBgX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-1581861840P--



_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
Exmh-workers@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers


