From: fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Oct  7 20:37:06 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B4F16F16
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  7 Oct 2002 20:37:05 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 07 Oct 2002 20:37:05 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g97JUQK14006 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:30:26 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 9D9B02940E1; Mon,  7 Oct 2002 12:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from 192.168.1.2 (smtp.piercelaw.edu [216.204.12.219]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B122940E0 for <fork@xent.com>;
    Mon,  7 Oct 2002 12:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 192.168.30.220 ([192.168.30.220]) by 192.168.1.2;
    Mon, 07 Oct 2002 15:26:20 -0400
From: bitbitch@magnesium.net
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) Educational
Reply-To: bitbitch@magnesium.net
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-Id: <171284997644.20021007152619@magnesium.net>
To: fork@example.com
Subject: And yet more absurdity.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:26:19 -0400
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NO_REAL_NAME,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_10_20
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

I knew it'd be a day for insanity.

so anyway, news.com decided to write up two wonderful articles on the
DMCA and decided to link to decss.exe, the very verboten code that
ended up getting 2600 (but none of the other news services that
originally linked) spanked.

Slashdot, of course, links to them.

So now, I link to slashdot.

http://slashdot.org/articles/02/10/07/1331217.shtml?tid=123

I find this all incredibly funny really.  Congress _and_ the courts
relaly do need to be considering how laws such as the DMCA are
applied.  For the most part, these rules are coming down to whose
friend you happen to be, how nefarious the defendant party is, and how
asleep the judge is behind the case (asleep/self-interested/bought).
Its giving me a real cynical view on being a lawyer, thats for sure.



-- 
Best regards,
 bitbitch                          mailto:bitbitch@magnesium.net


